Influence of Different Polishing Methods on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Dental Composites

• Autorzy: Mierzejewska Żaneta A. , Łukaszuk Kamila , Choromańska Magdalena , Zalewska Anna , Borys Jan , Antonowicz Bożena , Kulesza Ewa

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/178515

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The surface roughness and microhardness of dental composites greatly affects the durability of restorations. To evaluate the effect of three different polishing systems (Sof-Lex, Enhance+PoGo, Kenda) on the surface roughness and microhardness of microhybrid (Herculite XRV, Filtek Z250 and Charisma Flow) and nanohybrid (Herculite XRV Ultra, Filtek Z550 and Charisma Bulk Flow) composites resin used for dental fillings. Six different composites were used in the study. From each material, 40 cylinder-shaped samples were made. All samples were polymerized and polished using three different methods. To evaluate surface roughness a confocal laser microscope was used, and microhardness was determined using a universal Vickers hardness tester.The data were analysed using the one-way ANOVA test at a significance level of 0.05 for both tests. The smoothest surfaces in all groups of composites were obtained for control samples. Also in all groups of composite samples no statistically significant differences were found between the Sof-Lex and Enhance+PoGo. The measurement of surface roughness obtained for the Kenda system showed significantly lower values than for the other two methods. The surfaces of the control samples showed statistically significantly lower microhardness values compared to all polishing systems for all six tested resin composites, additionally no statistically significant differences were found between all finishing and polishing methods. Regardless of the finishing and polishing method used, the lowest microhardness values among microhybrid materials were found for Charisma Flow, while among nanohybrid materials the lowest values were obtained for Herculite HRV Ultra. Finishing and polishing increases the microhardness of microhybrid and nanohybrid composite resin. The use of Kenda three step polishing system resulted in smoother surface for all tested composite materials compared to the Sof-Lex and Enhance+PoGo systems, while the finishing and polishing method had little effect on the microhardness of the surface.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

resin composites; dental fillings; polishing procedure; roughness; microhardness

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 18, no 1
• Strony: 268--279
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 53 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mierzejewska Żaneta A.

• Department of Biomechatronics, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-9090

autor

Łukaszuk Kamila

• Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok

autor

Choromańska Magdalena

• Department of Restorative Dentistry, Medical University of Bialystok

autor

Zalewska Anna

• Department of Dental Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok

autor

Borys Jan

• Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok

autor

Antonowicz Bożena

• Department of Dental Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok

autor

Kulesza Ewa

• Department of Mechanics and Applied Computer Science, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Boaro L.C.C., Lopes D.P., de Souza A.S.C. et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent. Mater. 2019; 35(10): 249-264. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007.
• 2. Chittem J., Sajjan G.S., Kanumuri M.V. Spectrophotometric evaluation of colour stability of nano hybrid composite resin in commonly used food colourants in Asian countries. J. Clin. Diagnostic Res. 2017: 11(1): ZC61-ZC65. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22919.9193.
• 3. Bociong K., Krasowski M., Domarecka M., Sokołowski J. Wpływ metody fotopolimeryzacji kompozytów stomatologicznych na bazie żywic dimetakrylanowych na naprężenia skurczowe oraz wybrane właściwości utwardzonego materiału. Polimery 2016; 61(7-8): 499-508.
• 4. David C., de Cardoso G.C., Isolan C.P. et al. Bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite resins to dental tissues: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J. Prosthet. Dent. 128(5) (2022) 876-885. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.020.
• 5. Dziedzic K., Zubrzycka-Wróbel J., Józwik J. et al. Research on tribological properties of dental composite materials. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal (ASTRJ) 2016; 10 (32): 144-149. doi: 10.12913/22998624/65123.
• 6. Chowdhury D., Guha C., Desai P. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of dental amalgam, Z350 composite resin and cention-N restoration in class II cavity. J. Dent. Med. Sci. 2018; 4: 52-56.
• 7. Kopperud S.E., Staxrud F., Espelid I. et al. The postamalgam era: Norwegian dentists’ experiences with composite resins and repair of defective amalgam restorations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016; 13(4): 441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040441.
• 8. Yoshino F., Yoshida A. Effects of blue-light irradiation during dental treatment. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2018; 54(4): 160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.06.002.
• 9. Alammar A., Blatz M.B. The resin bond to high‐translucent zirconia – A systematic review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2022; 34(1): 117-135. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12876.
• 10. Rizzante F.A., Bombonatti J.S., Vasconcelos L. et al. Influence of resin-coating agents on the roughness and color of composite resins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019: 122(3): 332.e1-332.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.011.
• 11. St-Pierre L. , Martel C., Crépeau H. et al. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Oper. Dent. 2019; 44(3): E122-E132. doi:10.2341/17-140-L.
• 12. Nasoohi N., Hoorizad M., Tabatabaei S. F. Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins. J. Dent. 2017; 14(2): 69-75.
• 13. Jaramillo-Cartagena R., López-Galeano E.J., Latorre-Correa F. et al. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid and nanofilling composite resins: A systematic review. Dent. J. 2021; 9(8): 95. doi: 10.3390/dj9080095.
• 14. Aydın N., Topçu F.T., Karaoğlanoğlu S. et al. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2021; 13(5): e446-e454. doi: 10.4317/jced.58011.
• 15. Moda M.D., Godas A.G., Fernandes J.C. et al. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2018; 9(1): e12287. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12287.
• 16. Jovanović M., Živić M., Milosavljević M. A potential application of materials based on a polymer and CAD/CAM composite resins in prosthetic dentistry. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2021; 65(2): 137-147. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_404.
• 17. Demarco F.F., Collares K., Coelho-de-Souza F.H. et al. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent. Mater. 2015; 31(10): 1214-1224. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005.
• 18. Yilmaz E.Ç. Impact wear stress distribution and total deformation on dental material under chewing cycles: 3D finite element analysis. Journal of Dental Research and Review 2022; 9(2): 159-164. doi: 10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_35_22.
• 19. Osiewicz M.A., Werner A., Roeters F.J. et al. Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations. J. Oral Rehabil. 2021; 48(10); 1129-1134. doi: 10.1111/joor.13235.
• 20. Azmy E., Al-Kholy M.R.Z., Fattouh M.L. Impact of nanoparticles additions on the strength of dental composite resin. Int. J. Biomater. 2022; 5: 1165431. doi: 10.1155/2022/1165431
• 21. Magdy N. M., Kola M. Z., Alqahtani H. H. M. et al. Evaluation of surface roughness of different direct resin-based composites. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2017; 7(3): 104. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_72_17.
• 22. Lins F.C.R., Ferreira R.C., Silveira R.R. et al. Surface roughness, microhardness, and microleakage of a silorane-based composite resin after immediate or delayed finishing/polishing, Int. J. Dent. 2016; 2016:8346782. doi: 10.1155/2016/8346782.
• 23. Alshabib A., Silikas N., Watts D. C. Hardness and fracture toughness of resin-composite materials with and without fibers. Dent. Mater. 2019; 35(8): 1194-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.017.
• 24. Aminoroaya A., Neisiany R.E., Khorasani S.N. A review of dental composites: Challenges, chemistry aspects, filler influences, and future insights. Compos. B. Eng. 2016; 216: 108852. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108852.
• 25. Kundie F., Azhari C.H., Muchtar A. et al. Effects of filler size on the mechanical properties of polymerfilled dental composites: A review of recent developments. J. Phys. Sci. 2018; 29(1): 141-165.
• 26. Bozoğulları N.H., Büyükerkmen E.B., Büyüközer Özkan H. Comparison of surface roughness and color stability of different denture characterizing composite resins: The effect of different surface treatments. J. Prosthodont. 2023; 32(S1): 53-60. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13577.
• 27. Wheeler J., Deb S., Millar J.B. Evaluation of the effects of polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of dental composite resin. Br. Dent. J. 2020; 228(7): 527-532. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1370-8.
• 28. Dede D.Ö., Şahin O., Koroglu A. et al. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006; 16(1): 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.024.
• 29. Babina K., Polyakova M., Sokhova I. et al. The effect of finishing and polishing sequences on the surface roughness of three different nanocomposites and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces. Nanomater. 2020; 10(7): 1339. doi: 10.3390/nano10071339.
• 30. Devlukia S., Hammond L., Malik K. Is surface roughness of direct resin composite restorations material and polisher‐dependent? A systematic review. J. Esthet, Restor, Dent. 2023; 35(6): 947-967. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13102.
• 31. Szczepaniak M. E., Krasowski M., Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E. The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of two resin composites – an in vitro study. Coatings 2022; 12(7): 916. doi: 10.3390/coatings12070916.
• 32. Kamonkhantikul K., Arksornnukit M., Lauvahutanon S. et al. Toothbrushing alters the surface roughness and gloss of composite resin CAD/CAM blocks. Dent. Mater. J. 2016; 35(2): 225-232. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-228.
• 33. Yadav R.D., Raisingani D., Jindal D. et al. A comparative analysis of different finishing and polishing devices on nanofilled, microfilled, and hybrid composite: a scanning electron microscopy and profilometric study. Inte. J. Clin. Pediater. Dent. 2016; 9(3): 201-208. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1364.
• 34. Saati K., Khansari S., Mahdisiar F. et al. Evaluation of microhardness of two bulk-fill composite resins compared to a conventional composite resin on surface and in different depths. J. Dent. 2022; 23(1): 58-64.
• 35. Souza K., Silva R., Dias M.F. et al. Evaluation of different composite resin finishing and polishing protocols by confocal laser scan microscopy. Braz. J. Oral Sci. 2022; 21. doi: 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665334 .
• 36. Erdemir U., Sancakli H.S., Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. Eur. J. Dent. 2012; 6(02): 198-205. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327495/ (accessed September 24, 2023).
• 37. Aydın N., Topçu F.T., Karaoğlanoğlu S. et al. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2021; 13(5): e446-e454. doi: 10.4317/jced.58011.
• 38. Yikilgan I., Kamak H., Akgul S. et al. Effects of three different bleaching agents on microhardness and roughness of composite sample surfaces finished with different polishing techniques. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2017; 9(3): e460-e465. doi: 10.4317/jced.53136.
• 39. Vrochari A.D., Petropoulou A., Chronopoulos V. et al. Evaluation of surface roughness of ceramic and resin composite material used for conservative indirect restorations, after repolishing by intraoral means. J. Prosthodont. 2017; 26(4): 296-301. doi:10.1111/jopr.12390.
• 40. Daud A., Adams A., Shawkat A. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures. J. Dent. 2020; 99: 103376. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103376.
• 41. Sang E., Song J., Chung S.H. et al. Influence of a new polishing system on changes in gloss and surface roughness of resin composites after polishing and brushing. Dent. Mater. J. 2021; 40(3): 727-735. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-207.
• 42. Samal S. Effect of shape and size of filler particle on the aggregation and sedimentation behavior of the polymer composite. Powder Technol. 2020; 366: 43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.054.
• 43. Borges A.L., Tribst J.P., Dal Piva M.A. et al. In vitro evaluation of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced nanofibers composites for dental application. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2020; 69(16): 1015-1022. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2019.1655746.
• 44. Daud A., Gray G., Lynch C.D. et al. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. J. Dent. 2018; 71: 25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.008.
• 45. Korkmaz Y., Ozel E., Attar N. et al. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper. Dent. 2008; 33(1): 44-50. doi: 10.2341/07-28.
• 46. Aristiyanto R., Salsabila S., Hayuningtyas A.D. The different polishing systems effect on ormocer and supranano spherical filler composite resin surface roughness. Denta 2023; 17(1): 37-41. doi:10.30649/denta.v17i1.7.
• 47. Alfawaz Y., Impact of polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites, J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2017; 18(8): 647-651. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2100.
• 48. Kemaloglu H., Karacolak G., Turkun L.S. Can reduced‐step polishers be as effective as multiple‐step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness? J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2017; 29(1): 31-40. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12233.
• 49. Başeren M., Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures, J. Biomater. Appl. 2004; 19(2): 121-134. doi: 10.1177/0885328204044011.
• 50. Uctasli M.B., Arisu H.D., Omurlu H. et al. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials, J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2007; 8(2): 89-96. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17277831/ (accessed September 24, 2023).
• 51. Koh R., Neiva G., Dennison J. et al. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2008; 9(2): 138-45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18264536/ (accessed September 24, 2023).
• 52. da Silva T. M., Dantas D.C.B., Franco T.T. et al. Surface degradation of composite resins under staining and brushing challenges. J. Dent. Sci. 2019; 14(1): 87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.11.005.
• 53. Dülger K. The Effect of additional finishing and polishing sequences on hardness and roughness of two different dental composites: An in vitro study. J. Adv. Oral Res. 2022; 13(2): 216-224. doi: 10.1177/23202068221121518.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).