Weed Infestation and Yielding of Potato Under Conditions of Varied Use of Herbicides and Bio-Stimulants

• Autorzy: Gugała M. , Zarzecka K. , Dołęga H. , Sikorska A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/89654

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of applied herbicides and growth regulators on the airborne limitation of dry weed mass and the total yield of three edible potato varieties. The field experiment was established as two-factor in a (split-plot) system in three replications. The experiment examined: I factor – three moderately early varieties of edible potato: Bartek, Gawin, Honorata. II factor – five ways of using herbicides and bio-stimulants: 1. control object: mechanical care 2. Harrier 295 ZC herbicide at a dose of 2.0 dm³·ha^-1, 3. Harrier 295 ZC herbicide at a dose of 2.0 dm³·ha^-1 and then after the plant rises the Kelpak SL bioregulator twice at a dose of 2.0 dm³·ha^-1, 4. Sencor 70 WG herbicide at a dose of 1.0 kg·ha^-1, 5. Sencor 70 WG herbicide and then after the plant rises the Asahi SL bio-stimulant twice at a dose of 1.0 dm³·ha^-1. The obtained test results showed that the smallest dry weed mass determined in both research dates was obtained using Harrier 295 ZC herbicide and Kelpak SL growth bio-stimulant (0.7 g·m^-2 and 3.1 g·m^-2), while the largest in the control object (15.1 and 64.7 g·m^-2), respectively. The total yield of potato tubers depended on both the types of herbicides and bio-stimulants used and the varieties cultivated in the experiment. However, the weather conditions which varied in particular years significantly influenced both the size of the air-dried mass of weeds and the total yield of potato tubers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

air-dry weed mass; herbicides; biostimulants; total yield

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 19, nr 4
• Strony: 191--196
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Gugała M.

• Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Zarzecka K.

• Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Dołęga H.

• Undertaking Trade “Soleks” Wojnów, Poland

autor

Sikorska A.

• Department of Agriculture, The State Higher School of Vocational Education in Ciechanów, Narutowicza 9, 06-400 Ciechanów, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Anioł A., Bielecki S., Twardowski T. 2008. Genetically modified organisms – benefits and hazards for Poland. NAUKA, 1, 63-84. (in Polish)
• 2. Dobrzański A., Anyszka Z., Elkner K. 2008. Response of carrots to application of natural extracts from seaweed (Sargassum sp.). Algaminoplant and from leonardite – Humiplant. J. Res. App. Agric Eng., 53(3), 53-58.
• 3. Emitazi G., Nader A., Etemadifar Z. 2004. Effect of nitrogen fixing bacteria on growth of potato tubers. Advances in Food Sci., 26(2), 56-58.
• 4. Fernandez-Quintanilla C., Quadranti M., Kudsk P., Barberi P. 2008. Which future for weed science. Weed Res., 48, 297-301.
• 5. Golian J., Anyszka Z., Kohut M. 2014. The assessment of herbicides application with biostimulants and adjuvants in carrot (Daucus carota L.). Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 54(2), 167-173.
• 6. Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Sikorska A. 2014. The weed infestation and yielding of potato depending on the mechanical and chemical treatments. Fragm. Agron., 31(3), 50-57.
• 7. Kierzek R., Dubas M., Matysiak K. 2013. Wpływ łącznego stosowania biostymulatora Aminoplant z herbicydami na wielkość i jakość plonu buraka cukrowego. Prog. Plant Prot./ Post. Ochr. Roślin. 53(3), 621-626.
• 8. Kierzek R., Dubas M., Matysiak K. 2015. Wpływ łącznego stosowania biostymulatora Aminoplant z mieszaniną terbutyloazyny i bromoksynilu (Zeagran 340 SE) na efekt chwastobójczy oraz plonowanie kukurydzy. Prog. Plant Prot./ Post. Ochr. Roślin. 55 (2), 164-169.
• 9. Kołodziejczyk M. 2013. Wpływ warunków opadowo-termicznych na plonowanie średnio późnych i późnych odmian ziemniaka jadalnego. Ann. UMCS, Sect. E. Agricultura. Vol. LXVIII(3), 1-10.
• 10. Kositorna J., Smoliński M. 2008. Asahi SL biostymulator in protection of sugar beet from herbicide stress. p. 41-49. In: “Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Field Crops” (Z.T. Dąbrowski, ed.). Wieś Jutra, Warszawa, 118 ss.
• 11. Koziara W., Sulewska H., Panasiewicz K. 2006. Effect of resistance stimulator application to some agricultural crops J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 51(2), 82-87.
• 12. Maciejewski T., Michalski T., Bartos-Spychała M. 2008. Effect of the application of biostimulator Asahi SL on the yield of potato tubers and their quality. In: Biostimulators in modern agriculture. Konf. 7-8 February, Warszawa. Part: Solanaceous crops. (Ed.) Dąbrowski Z. T., Wieś Jutra: 52-60.
• 13. Maciejewski T., Szukała J., Jarosz A. 2007. Influence of biostymulator Asahi SL i Atonik SL on qualitative tubers of potatoes. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 52(3), 109-112.
• 14. Matysiak K. 2010. Technologically and interventional. Wiadomości Rolnicze Polska 66(3), 6. (in Polish)
• 15. Matysiak K., Adamczewski K. 2010. Effect of plant growth and development regulator Moddus 250 EC, Kelpak SL, Algaminoplant, Humiplant and Yeald Plus on the yield and size of potato tubers. Ziemniak Polski, 1, 28-33. (in Polish)
• 16. Mystkowska I., Zarzecka K., Baranowska A., Gugała M. 2017. Weed infestation of potato cultivars depending on weed control methods and weather conditions. Acta Agroph., 24(1), 111-121.
• 17. Praczyk T., Skrzypczak G. 2011. The current state and directions of weed science development. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 51(1), 354-363.
• 18. Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Zagórski P. 2013. Wpływ biologicznych zapraw na zdrowotność roślin i plonowanie ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Prot./Postępy w Ochronie Roślin. 53(2), 333-339.
• 19. Sawicka B., Barbaś P., Dąbek-Gad M. 2011. The problem of weed infestation in conditions of applying the growth bioregulators and foliar fertilization in potato cultivation. Nauka Przyr. Technol., 5(2), 1-12.
• 20. Sekutowski T., Badowski M. 2010. Wpływ zachwaszczenia, warunków meteorologicznych i ochrony herbicydowej na plon i poszczególne frakcje bulw ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Prot./ Post. Ochr. Roślin. 50(3), 1390-1394.
• 21. Trawczyński C. 2014. Wpływ biostymulatorów aminokwasowych – Tecamin – na plon i jakość ziemniaków. Ziemniak Polski 3, 29-34.
• 22. Trętowski J., Wójcik R. 1991. Methodology of agricultural experiments. Wyd. WSRP Siedlce, 500.
• 23. Wichrowska D. 2008. The effect of herbicides on the yield and structure of potato tubers cultivated in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie region. Ekol. Tech., 16(4), 141-144.
• 24. Wierzbicka A., Trawczyński C. 2016. Yields potential and level of their utilization by the potato cultivars registered in the years 2006-2015. Fragm. Agron., 33(4), 145-154.
• 25. Zarzecka K., Gugała M., Dołęga H. 2013. Regulation of weed infestation degree in potato with the use of herbicides. Biul. IHAR, 267, 113-119.