Risk management in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in an enterprise – Ishikawa cause-and-effect diagram

• Autorzy: Saja Piotr , Woźny Artur , Bednarova Lucia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/czoto-2021-0026

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Business continuity depends on the quality of management of individual processes. The management team strives to anticipate all possible threats and define protective measures. In the event of the COVID-19 pandemic enterprises were not prepared for such threats. Therefore, an important role is played by the health and safety inspector who should be involved in the company management process. The impact of the safety aspects of the work environment on the quality and efficiency of work is even more important in the event of an unexpected hazard that is difficult to completely eliminate. The purpose of the paper is to present the causes and effects of the COVID-19 biohazard according to the Ishikawa diagram on the example of a selected process in an enterprise.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk management; Ishikawa diagram; COVID-19 hazard analysis

PL

zarządzanie ryzykiem; schemat Ishikawy; analiza zagrożenia COVID-19

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: System Safety : Human - Technical Facility - Environment
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 3, nr 1
• Strony: 253--259
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Saja Piotr

• Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-9455+

autor

Woźny Artur

• Podkarpackie Centre for Teaching Services, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-0157+

autor

Bednarova Lucia

• Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-0643+

Bibliografia

• [1] Baryshnikova, N., Kiriliuk, O., Klimecka-Tatar, D., 2021. Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector of the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Production Engineering Archives, 27(1), 8-15. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2
• [2] Gula, M., Fatih, M., 2018. A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 20, 653-664.
• [3] Head, G.L., 1994. Controlling warehouse hazards, Professional Safety, Des Plaines, 39, 10, 55.
• [4] Michaels, D., Wagner, G.R., 2020. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Worker Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic, JAMA October 13, 324(14), 1389-1390.
• [5] Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., 2020. Improving the process of analysing the causes of problem by integrating the Ishikawa diagram and FAHP method, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series, 143, 2020, 247-257.
• [6] Saja, P., 2017. Doskonalenie zarządzania bhp terminalu przeładunkowego firmy logistycznej, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej Zarządzanie, 25, Częstochowa.
• [7] Saja, P., Woźny, A., Pacana, A., Dobosz, M., 2017. Additional components of risk assessment and their impact on the probability parameter, Production Engineering Archives, 14, 11-14. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2017.14.03
• [8] Vries, J., Koster, R., Stam, D., 2016. Safety Does Not Happen by Accident: Antecedents To A Safer Warehouse, Production and Operations Management Society, 25, 8, 1377-1390.
• [9] Wolany, W., Spilka, M., 2011. Influence of safety culture on the safety level in chosen enterprise, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 49, 2, 507-513.
• [10] Woźny, A., Pacana, A., 2017. Synthetische Auffassung der Methoden für Gefährdungsbeurteilung, Franciszek Hadam Euro-Capitol, Friedrichshafen.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).