A Theoretical and Practical Approach to Exponential Relation between Innovation and Sustainable Development

Ceko, Enriko; Mulita, Reis; Jaupaj, Artur

doi:10.35784/preko.5882

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

A Theoretical and Practical Approach to Exponential Relation between Innovation and Sustainable Development

Autorzy

Ceko Enriko , Mulita Reis , Jaupaj Artur

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/preko.5882

Warianty tytułu

Teoretyczne i praktyczne podejście do wykładniczej relacji między innowacjami a zrównoważonym rozwojem

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Aside from the political, geographic, economic, legal, social, and cultural problems that every nation, state, and government faces, it is evident that sustainable development is the key to sustainability, progress, and improving the quality of life. Achieving SDG targets has been seen as the primary trend for the past 15 years and the foreseeable future. In this direction, with an eye towards the fifth industrial revolution, innovation has been viewed as one of the primary production variables, along with land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship, to help address current and future difficulties facing humanity. This study aimed to shed light on the connections between innovation and sustainable development. To test Hypothesis H1, which states a positive solid relationship between the SDG Index and ISO 9001 Index, we conducted a statistical analysis using regressive analysis between the Sustainable Development Goals Index and Innovation Index. This was done to compare the results to Hypothesis H0, which suggests no such relationship exists. The research's findings indicate that scientific management of the factors of production opens up possibilities for long-term sustainable development, ensuring the prosperity of society and everyday life for future generations, encouraging economic growth, and improving the quality of life without endangering the environment. Innovation, embodied in the ISO 56000 family of standards, is applied as an efficient and effective tool, which is urgently needed. The overall conclusion of the study – which also serves as a practical and social contribution to the field – is that, to achieve and sustain sustainable development scenarios, all interested parties – individuals, public and private institutions, decision-makers, and civil society – should look forward to ensuring that the SDG and innovation are built and maintained. Innovation principles can be applied as effective and efficient tools.

Oprócz problemów politycznych, geograficznych, ekonomicznych, prawnych, społecznych i kulturowych, przed którymi stoi każdy naród, państwo i rząd, oczywiste jest, że zrównoważony rozwój jest kluczem do postępu ipoprawy jakości życia. Osiąganie Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju jest postrzegane jako główny trend w dającej się przewidzieć przyszłości. W tym kierunku, z myślą o piątej rewolucji przemysłowej, innowacje są postrzegane jako jedna z głównych zmiennych produkcyjnych, obok ziemi, pracy, kapitału i przedsiębiorczości, pomagająca stawić czoła obecnym i przyszłym trudnościom stojącym przed ludzkością. Celem tego badania było ukazanie powiązania pomiędzy innowacjami a zrównoważonym rozwojem. Aby przetestować Hipotezę H1, która stwierdza pozytywną, solidną zależność pomiędzy Indeksem SDG a Indeksem ISO 9001, przeprowadziliśmy analizę statystyczną przy użyciu analizy regresyjnej pomiędzy Indeksem Celów Zrównoważonego Rozwoju a Indeksem Innowacji. Dokonano tego w celu porównania wyników z Hipotezą H0, która sugeruje, że taka zależność nie istnieje. Wyniki badań wskazują, że naukowe zarządzanie czynnikami produkcji otwiera możliwości długoterminowego, zrównoważonego rozwoju, zapewnienia dobrobytu społeczeństwa i życia codziennego przyszłym pokoleniom, wspierania wzrostu gospodarczego i poprawy jakości życia bez zagrażania środowisku. Innowacja zawarta w grupie norm ISO 56000 może być stosowana jako wydajne i skuteczne narzędzie, które jest pilnie potrzebne. Ogólny wniosek z badania – które stanowi również praktyczny i społeczny wkład w tę dziedzinę – jest taki, że aby osiągnąć iutrzymać scenariusze zrównoważonego rozwoju, wszystkie zainteresowane strony – osoby fizyczne, instytucje publiczne i prywatne, decydenci i społeczeństwo obywatelskie – powinniśmy z niecierpliwością oczekiwać stworzenia i utrzymania Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju i innowacji. Zasady innowacji można zastosować jako skuteczne i wydajne narzędzia.

Słowa kluczowe

SDG Index innovation index ISO 56000 quality management

indeks celów zrównoważonego rozwoju indeks innowacji ISO 56000 zarządzanie jakością

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 19, no. 2

Strony

114--125

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 46 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ceko Enriko

enrikoceko@yahoo.co.uk

Canadian Institute of Technology (Albania)

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-2785

autor

Mulita Reis

Canadian Institute of Technology (Albania)

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-469X

autor

Jaupaj Artur

Canadian Institute of Technology (Albania)

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3893-7340

Bibliografia

1. Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. *Research in Organizational Behavior*, *36*, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
2. Anadon, L. D., Gabriel, C., Harley, A., Matus, K., Moon, S., Murthy, S. L., & Clark, C. (2015). *Making Technological Innovation Work for Sustainable Development* (HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP15-079). https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/making-technological-innovation-work-sustainable-development
3. Bali, S. R., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies. *International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology*, *27*(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1692316
4. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. *Management Decision*, *47*(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
5. Bartram, J., Brocklehurst, C., Bradley, D., Muller, M., & Evans, B. (2018). Policy review of the means of implementation targets and indicators for the sustainable development goal for water and sanitation. *Clean Water*, *1*(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-018-0003-0
6. Berg, C. (2020). *Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers*. Abingdon, Oxon.
7. Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. *Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability*, *Open issue, part II*. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
8. Bhasin, K. (2012, April 2). *This is the difference between invention and innovation*. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/this-is-the-difference-between-invention-and-innovation-2012-4
9. Brown, J. H. (2015). The Oxymoron of Sustainable Development. *BioScience*, *65*(10), 1027–1029. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv117
10. Clark, W. C., & Alicia, G. H. (2020). *Sustainability Science: Towards a Synthesis* (Sustainability Science Program Working Paper 2019-01). John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42574531
11. Drucker, P. F. (2002, August). *The Discipline of Innovation*. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2002/08/the-discipline-of-innovation
12. Edison, H., Ali, N. B., & Torkar, R. (2014). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. *Journal of Systems and Software*, *86*(5), 1390–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.013
13. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Red.). (2005). *The Oxford handbook of innovation*. Oxford University Press.
14. Forbes. (2015, September 15). *What is the Difference Between Invention and Innovation?* https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2015/09/10/whats-the-difference-between-invention-and-innovation/?sh=364f381f70f4
15. GII. (2023). *Global Innovation Index Report 2023*. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2023/.
16. Mayer, H. (2020, July 15). *ISO 56000 Series of Innovation Management Standards – What are they?* BBRIEF. https://www.bbrief.co.za/2020/07/15/iso-56000-series-of-innovation-management-standards-what-are-they/
17. Isnaeni, N. M., Dulkiah, M., & Wildan, A. D. (2022). Patterns of Middle-Class Communities Adaptation to the Village SDGs Program in Bogor Regency. *Temali Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial*, *5*(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v5i2.20466
18. ISO. (2020). *ISO 56000:2020(en)Innovation management — Fundamentals and vocabulary*. https://www.iso.org/standard/69315.html
19. Jasanoff, S., & Sang-Hyun, K. (2015). *Dreamscapes of Modernity*. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
20. Johnson, J. A., Baldos, U. L., Corong, E., Hertel, T., Polasky, S., Cervigni, R., Roxburgh, T., Ruta, G., Salemi, C., & Thakrar, S. (2023). Investing in nature can improve equity and economic returns. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, *120*(27). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220401120
21. Keeble, B. R. (1988). The Brundtland report: Our common future. *Medicine and War*, *4*(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
22. Lange, S., Pohl, J., & Santarius, T. (2020). Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? *Ecological Economics*, *176*, 106760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
23. Dudley, L. (2012). *Mothers of Innovation: How Expanding Social Networks Gave Birth to the Industrial Revolution*. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
24. Lijster, T. (2018). *The Future of the New: Artistic Innovation in Times of Social Acceleration* (Antennae-Arts in Society, No. 26). https://www.westdenhaag.nl/information/exhibitions/18_10_The_Future_of_the_New/more1/TheFutureOfTheNew.pdf
25. Marcus, L. (2022, September 23). *Innovation management according to ISO 56002. How companies use the new standard for innovation management to continuously improve their innovation capabilities and performance and create sustainable value*. More Than Digital. https://morethandigital.info/en/innovation-management-according-to-iso-56002/
26. McKinsey Guides. (2022). *Your guide to sustainable innovation*. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/themes/your-guide-to-sustainable-innovation
27. Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: A literature review. *Cogent Social Sciences*, *5*(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
28. Opie, R., Elliott, J., & Schumpeter, E., Joseph, A. (1983). *The economic development theory: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle*. New Brunswick, New Jersey.
29. Papaioannou, T. (2020). Innovation, value-neutrality and the question of politics: unmasking the rhetorical and ideological abuse of evolutionary theory. *Journal of Responsible Innovation*, *7*(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1605484
30. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. *Sustain. Sci.*, *14*, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
31. Robert, K. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. *Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development*, *47*(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
32. Robra, B., Giotitsas, C., & Pansera, M. (2023). From creative destruction to convivial innovation – A post-growth perspective. *Technovation*, *125*, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102760
33. Schleicher, J., Schaafsma, M., & Vira, B. (2018). Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment? *Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability*, *34*, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004
34. Schumpeter, J. (1939). *Business Cycles*. McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://discoversocialsciences.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/schumpeter_businesscycles_fels.pdf
35. UNESCO. (2015). *Sustainable Development*. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000244834
36. UNESCO. (2020). *Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Report of the Secretary-General, High-level political forum on sustainable development, convened under the auspices of the Economic and Social Council (E/2020/57)*. https://www.nmun.org/assets/documents/conference-archives/washington-dc/2021/dc21-bgg-hlpf.pdf
37. UNDP. (2018). *Goal 9: Industry, innovation, infrastructure*. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
38. UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY. (1987). *Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future* (UN General Assembly Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
39. UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY. (2005). *Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on Sep 16, 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome*. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf
40. UN. (2015). *Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on Sep 25, 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development* (A/RES/70/1). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf
41. UN. (2017). *The 17 Goals. Sustainable Development Goals. UN. SDG Indicators – Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development*. United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD). https://operation-eyesight.com/sustainable-development-goals/?gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIiKuH-vL9hAMViYeDBx1ilAeOEAAYASAAEgI-JPD_BwE
42. UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE. (2014). *Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations on Measuring Sustainable Development*. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2013/CES_SD_web.pdf
43. UN. (2017). *Work of the Statistical Commission about the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development* (A/RES/71/313). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1291226?ln=en&v=pdf
44. UN. (2023). *United Nations Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023*. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
45. Walsh, S. (2021). Marx, subsumption and the critique of innovation. *Organization*, *30*(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015377
46. Williams, C. C., & Millington, A. C. (2004). The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. *The Geographical Journal*, *170*(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00111.x

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-2777a4bf-0580-44e1-8e23-ce59dad572a7