Substantiation of the optimal location of goods production using 3D printing technologies: a system approach

• Autorzy: Stadnicki Jerzy , Nagaitseva Olga

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.198.28

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to identify the factors of optimal location of the production of benefits using 3D printing technologies and to develop criteria for identifying within the space of possible placement of potential locations for the production of benefits using 3D printing technologies. This will make it possible to justify the optimal location of the production of benefits using 3D printing technologies based on a system approach. Design/methodology/approach: The correct justification of the optimal location of 3D printing production is possible only based on a system approach that involves considering the competition of other (interchangeable) technologies, as well as the simultaneous justification of production capacity and supply volumes to specific sales markets. Findings: The location factors for producing goods using 3D printing technologies are relatively low prices for electricity and 3D printing materials, as well as a short distance to the sales markets and a developed transport infrastructure between the potential places of production 3D printing and potential sales markets. All locations from the space of possible placement that are characterized by at least one placement factor can be considered attractive locations for the production of benefits using 3D printing technologies, but the locations with the key placement factors for the production of benefits using 3D printing technologies - a short distance to sales markets - are of particular importance. Practical implications: Use of the materials of the research conducted in the article can be of significant practical importance, since the correct substantiation of the optimal location of production using 3D printing technologies will allow to fully utilize the potential efficiency of these perspective technologies, which are promising in terms of increasing the economic security of individual firms, countries and the European Union as a whole. Originality/value: The article identifies the factors of the production location using 3D printing technologies, develops a categorization of attractive places for the production location using 3D printing technologies, and proposes a methodology for determining the pointwise, locally and systemically optimal production technologies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

system approach; 3D printing technologies; optimal production location; places of potential production location; factors of production location

PL

podejście systemowe; technologie druku 3D; optymalna lokalizacja produkcji; miejsca potencjalnej lokalizacji produkcji; czynniki lokalizacji produkcji

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 198
• Strony: 511--525
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz

Twórcy

autor

Stadnicki Jerzy

• University of Technology, Kielce

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-1347

autor

Nagaitseva Olga

• Ukrainian Free University, Munich

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-1347

Bibliografia

• 1. Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C. (2018). Reshoring and Industry 4.0: how often do they go together? IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(2), 87-96. DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2018.2833475.
• 2. Ben-Ner, A., Siemsen, E. (2017). Decentralization and localization of production: The organizational and economic consequences of additive manufacturing (3D printing). California Management Review, 59(2), 5-23. DOI:10.1177/0008125617695284.
• 3. Bogers, M., Hadar, R., Bilberg, A. (2016). Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing. Technological forecasting and social change, 102, 225-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.024.
• 4. Busch, H., Muhl, C., Fuchs, M., Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2021). Digital urban production: how does Industry 4.0 reconfigure productive value creation in urban contexts? Regional Studies, 55(10-11), 1801-1815. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1957460.
• 5. Costabile, G., Fera, M., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., Pham, D. (2017). Cost models of additive manufacturing: A literature review. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 8(2), 263-282. DOI:10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.9.001.
• 6. Culot, G., Orzes, G., Sartor, M., Nassimbeni, G. (2020). The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0. Technological forecasting and social change, 157, 120092. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120092.
• 7. Fraske, T. (2022). Industry 4.0 and its geographies: A systematic literature review and the identification of new research avenues. Digital Geography and Society, 3(3), 100031. DOI: 10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100031.
• 8. Gong, H., Hassink, R., Foster, C., Hess, M., Garretsen, H. (2022). Globalisation in reverse? Reconfiguring the geographies of value chains and production networks. Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society, 15(2), 165-181. DOI:10.1093/cjres/rsac012.
• 9. Gress, D., Kalafsky, R. (2015). Geographies of production in 3D: Theoretical and research implications stemming from additive manufacturing. Geoforum, 60, 43-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.003.
• 10. Haefner, L., Sternberg, R. (2020). Spatial implications of digitization: State of the field and research agenda. Geography Compass, 14(12), e12544. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12544.
• 11. Halassi, S., Semeijn, J., Kiratli, N. (2019). From consumer to prosumer: a supply chain revolution in 3D printing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(2), 200-216. DOI:10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2018-0139.
• 12. Jadhav, A., Jadhav, V. (2022). A review on 3D printing: An additive manufacturing technology. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62(4), 2094-2099. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.558.
• 13. Jandyal, A., Chaturvedi, I., Wazir, I., Raina, A., Haq, M. (2022). 3D printing - a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 33-42. DOI:10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.004.
• 14. Pour, M., Zanardini, M., Bacchetti, A., Zanoni, S. (2016). Additive manufacturing impacts on productions and logistics systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1679-1684. DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.822.
• 15. Praveena, B.A., Lokesh, N., Buradi, A., Santhosh, N., Praveena, B.L., Vignesh, R. (2021). A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): Methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52(3), 1309-1313. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.059.
• 16. Rehnberg, M., Ponte, S. (2018). From smiling to smirking? 3D printing, upgrading and the restructuring of global value chains. Global Networks, 18(1), 57-80. DOI: 10.1111/glob.12166.
• 17. Ronchini, A., Moretto, A., Caniato, F. (2023). Adoption of additive manufacturing technology: drivers, barriers and impacts on upstream supply chain design. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(4), 532-554. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015.
• 18. Sasson, A., Johnson, J. (2016). The 3D printing order: variability, supercenters and supply chain reconfigurations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(1), 82-94. DOI:10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2015-0257.
• 19. Stadnicki, J., Bashynska, Y. (2023). Production of goods: what, where, how, how much and for whom. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management, 179(12), 587-602. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.179.31.
• 20. Stadnicki, J., Terebukh, A. (2022). Rationale of the Optimal Location of Production: a System Approach. Management and Production Engineering Review, 13(3), 110-117. DOI: 10.24425/mper.2022.142388.
• 21. Stentoft, J., Wickstrom, K., Haug, A., Philipsen, K. (2023). Additive manufacturing-enabled innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: the role of readiness in make-or-buy decisions. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(6), 1768-1788.DOI:10.1108/IMDS-11-2022-0700.
• 22. Strange, R., Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review, 25(3), 174-184. DOI:10.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028.
• 23. Tang, C., Veelenturf, L. (2019). The strategic role of logistics in the industry 4.0 era. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 129, 1-11. DOI: 15.1016/j.tre.2019.06.004.
• 24. Theyel, G., Hofmann, K., Gregory, M. (2018). Understanding manufacturing location decision making: rationales for retaining, offshoring, reshoring, and hybrid approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(4), 300-312. DOI:10.1177/0891242418800222

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).