Possibilities of using the concept of ecosystem services at the regional level in experts’ opinions

• Autorzy: Stępniewska M. , Łowicki D. , Lupa P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the European Union countries, including Poland, work is being conducted on the implementation of the ecosystem services (ES) approach in policy and decision-making. This process is relatively advanced at the level of individual member states; however, it still constitutes a big challenge on the subnational level. The determination of reasons for such a status quo and searching for solutions were main subjects of one of the workshops at the ECOSERV 2016 symposium that was held in Poznań in 2016. 30 persons representing the most important Polish authorities and institutions dealing with environmental management participated in the workshop. The analysis performed made it possible to identify a set of conditions, which, according to the experts, are the most important for the development of the ES approach in the regional scale.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ecosystem services; EU Biodiversity Strategy; World Café Method; regional level

PL

usługi ekosystemów; strategia ochrony różnorodności biologicznej UE; metoda World Café; poziom regionalny

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 1
• Strony: 81--91
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Stępniewska M.

• Adam Mickiewicz University Krygowskiego 10, Poznań, 61–680, Poland

autor

Łowicki D.

• Adam Mickiewicz University Krygowskiego 10, Poznań, 61–680, Poland

autor

Lupa P.

• Adam Mickiewicz University Krygowskiego 10, Poznań, 61–680, Poland

Bibliografia

• EC (2012), Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Water Resources, European Commission, Brussels 2012
• EEA (2013), Available data for mapping and assessing ecosystems in Europe, Final report, http://projects.eionet.europa.eu/eea-ecosystem-assessments/library/ working-document-data-availability/ecosystem-assessment-data-availability_ report_03-june–2013 [07–11–2016]
• EEA (2015), European ecosystem assessment — concept, data, and implementation, Technical report No 6/2015, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-ecosystem-assessment [07–11–2016]
• EU (2011), EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, 2011, European Commission, Brussels
• EU (2013), Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, European Parliament, Strasbourg 2013, Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, L347, p. 487–548
• Honey-Rosés J., Pendleton L. H. (2013), A demand driven research agenda for ecosystem services, “Ecosystem Services” No. 5, p. 160–162
• Kopperoinen L., Maes J., Streberová E., Pártl A., Pitkänen K., Virag-Prokai R. (2016), Ecosystem service mapping and assessment gaps in EU member states and recommendations to overcome them. Deliverable 2.2. EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007
• Kostrzewski A., Mizgajski A., Stępniewska M., Tylkowski J. (2014), The use of Integrated Environmental Programme for ecosystem services assessment, “Ekonomia i Środowisko” No. 4(51), p. 94–101
• Lupa P., Mizgajski A. (2014), The inϐluence of the data analysis scale on the estimated size of ecosystem services, “Ekonomia i Środowisko” No. 4(51), p. 125–136
• Mączka K., Matczak P., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska A., Rechciński M., Olszańska A., Cent J., Grodzińska-Jurczak M. (2016), Application of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy—A systematic empirical analysis of national level policy documents in Poland, “Ecological Economics” Vol. 128, p. 169–176
• Mizgajski A. (2008), Zarządzanie środowiskiem i jego pozycja w badaniach geogra- ϔicznych, “Przegląd Geograϐiczny” No. 80, 1, p. 23–37
• NUP (2015), National Urban Policy, (M.P. 2015 item 1235)
• PCSB (2015), The Programme of conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, (M.P. 2015 item 1207)
• Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska A., Grodzińska-Jurczak M. (2012), Ecosystem services perception. The example of local governments representatives in Małopolska voivodeship, “Ekonomia i Środowisko” No. 2(42), p. 83–90
• Stępniewska M. (2016a), Doświadczenia z pierwszego roku wdrażania oceny usług geoekosystemów w ramach Zintegrowanego monitoringu środowiska przyrodniczego, in: Kostrzewski A., Szpikowski J., Domańska M. (eds), Zintegrowany Monitoring środowisk przyrodniczego. Funkcjonowanie, tendencje rozwoju, zagrożenia i ochrona środowiska przyrodniczego Polski, Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Storkowo, p. 37–41
• Stępniewska M. (2016b), Ecosystem Service Mapping and Assessment as a Support for Policy and Decision Making, “CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water” Vol. 44, Issue 10, p. 1414– 1422
• Stępniewska M., Zwierzchowska I., Mizgajski A. (2017), Capability of the Polish Legal System to introduce the ecosystem services approach into the Environmental Management System, “Ecosystem Services”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser. 2017.02.025 [09–03–2017]

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).