PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

A review on machinability in the milling processes

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This review paper focuses on the up-to-date machinability characteristics of milling processes such as cutting forces, surface roughness and tool wear and their impacts on the cutting mechanism. The methodology pur-sued in this paper is to analyze the previous research articles published between 2019–2022 classifying them into the subcategoriesthat usemill-ing operation as manufacturing strategy. As known, milling is one of the most used machining processes in industry and often applied for academic studiesforawide range of materials. Therefore, used sensor systems, main aim and the preferred methodology were summarized in the context of this paper. Seemingly, a great number of machinability papers have been published recently which focuses on the several types of engineering ma-terials and utilized various types of sensor system to improve the surface roughness and tool life. In addition, the investigation showed that optimi-zation approaches have been applied broadly to detect the best machining conditions. Also, it was observed that several modeling approaches such as finite element analysis is a good alternative to analyze the process.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
27--36
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 53 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Selcuk University, Technology Faculty, Mechanical Engineering Department, Konya, 42130, Turkey
  • Selcuk University, Technology Faculty, Mechanical Engineering Department, Konya, 42130, Turkey
  • Selcuk University, Technology Faculty, Mechanical Engineering Department, Konya, 42130, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • 1. Yaseer, A. and H. Chen, Machine learning basedlayer roughness modeling in robotic additive manufacturing.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021. 70: p. 543–552.
  • 2. Korkmaz, M.E., et al., Indirect monitoring of machining characteristics via advanced sensor systems: a critical review.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2022: p. 1–36.
  • 3. Ghazali, M.F., et al., Tool wear and surfaceevaluation in drilling fly ash geopolymer using HSS, HSS-Co, and HSS-TiN cutting tools.Materials, 2021. 14(7): p. 1628.
  • 4. Yaşar, N., et al., A novel method for improving drilling performance of CFRP/Ti6AL4V stackedmaterials.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021. 117(1): pp.653–673.
  • 5. Benardos, P. and G.-C. Vosniakos, Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review.International journal of machine tools and manufacture, 2003. 43(8): p. 833–844.
  • 6. Binali, R., Sıcak iş takım çeliğinin (TOOLOX 44) işlenebilirliğinin incelenmesi.Karabük Üniversitesi Fen Bİlimleri Enstitüsü, 2017.
  • 7. Dhanda, M., et al., On modelling and analysis of voxel-based force prediction for a 3-axis CNC machining.Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 2022: p. 1–12.
  • 8. Chen, X., et al., Cutting force prediction between different machine tool systems based on transfer learning method.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022: p. 1–13.
  • 9. Chen, Y., et al., Modeling study of milling force considering tool runout at different types of radial cutting depth.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022. 76: p. 486–503.
  • 10. Shi, K.-N., et al., Indirect approach for predicting cutting force coefficients and power consumption in milling process.Advances in Manufacturing, 2022. 10(1): p. 101–113.
  • 11. Qin, S., et al., CWE identification and cutting forceprediction in ball-end milling process.InternationalJournal of Mechanical Sciences, 2022: p. 107863.
  • 12. Wan, M., et al., On material separation and cutting force prediction in micro milling through involving the effect of dead metal zone.International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2019. 146: p. 103452.
  • 13. Bernini, L., P. Albertelli, and M. Monno, Mill condition monitoring based on instantaneous identification of specific force coefficients under variablecutting conditions.Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023. 185: p. 109820.
  • 14. Mao, J., et al., A material constitutive model-basedprediction method for flank milling force considering the deformation of workpiece.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022. 84: p. 403–413.
  • 15. Grossi, N., et al., A frequency-based analysis of cutting force for depths of cut identification in peripheral end-milling.Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022. 171: p. 108943.
  • 16. Chen, X., et al., A new method for prediction of cutting force considering the influence of machine tool system and tool wear.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2022. 120(3): p. 1843–1852.
  • 17. Li, B., X. Tian, and M. Zhang, Modeling and multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in the high-speed milling using RSM and improved TLBO algorithm.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020. 111(7): p. 2323–2335.
  • 18. Dai, W., et al., Tool condition monitoring in the milling process based on multisource pattern recognition model.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022. 119(3): p. 2099–2114.
  • 19. Xu, L., et al., Prediction of tool wear width size and optimization of cutting parameters in milling process using novel ANFIS-PSO method.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2022. 236(1-2): p. 111–122.
  • 20. Liu, D., et al., Tool wear monitoring through online measured cutting force and cutting temperature during face milling Inconel 718.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2022. 122(2): p. 729–740.
  • 21. Choudhury, S. and S. Rath, In-process tool wear estimation in milling using cutting force model.Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2000. 99(1–3): p. 113–119.
  • 22. Awasthi, U., et al., Physics-based modeling and information-theoretic sensor and settings selection for tool wear detection in precision machining.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022. 81: p. 127–140.
  • 23. Bi, G., et al., Wear characteristics of multi-tooth milling cutter in milling CFRP and its impact on machining performance.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022. 81: p. 580–593.
  • 24. Khanna, N., et al., Comparison of dry and liquidcarbon dioxide cutting conditions based on machining performance and life cycle assessment for end milling GFRP.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022. 122(2): p. 821–833.
  • 25. Khan, M.A., et al., Comparative analysis of tool wear progression of dry and cryogenic turning of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V under low, moderate and high tool wear conditions.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2022: p. 1-19.
  • 26. Aslan, A., Optimization and analysis of process parameters for flank wear, cutting forces and vibration in turning of AISI 5140: A comprehensivestudy.Measurement, 2020. 163: p. 107959.
  • 27. Chuangwen, X., et al., The relationships between cutting parameters, tool wear, cutting force and vibration.Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2018. 10(1): p. 1687814017750434.
  • 28. Moran, T., R. MacDonald, and H. Zhang, A Dynamic Simulation Model for Understanding Sustainability of Machining Operation.Sustainability, 2022. 15(1): p. 152.
  • 29. Xu, L., et al., A novel intelligent reasoning system to estimate energy consumption and optimize cutting parameters toward sustainable machining.Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 261: p. 121160.
  • 30. Biermann, D. and A. Baschin, Influence of cutting edge geometry and cutting edge radius on the stability of micromilling processes.Production Engineering, 2009. 3: p. 375–380.
  • 31. Rodríguez, J., J. Carbonell, and P. Jonsen, Numerical methods for the modelling of chip formation.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2020. 27: p. 387–412.
  • 32. Quintana, G. and J. Ciurana, Chatter in machining processes: A review.International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2011. 51(5): p. 363–376.
  • 33. Peigne, G., et al., Impact of the cutting dynamics ofsmall radial immersion milling operations on machined surface roughness.International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2004. 44(11): p. 1133–1142.
  • 34. Thomas, T., Characterization of surface roughness.Precision Engineering, 1981. 3(2): p. 97–104.
  • 35. Kundrák, J., et al., The energetic characteristics of milling with changing cross-section in the definition of specific cutting force by FEM method.CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2021. 32: p. 61–69.
  • 36. Ali, M.H., et al., FEM to predict the effect of feed rateon surface roughness with cutting force during facemilling of titanium alloy.Hbrc Journal, 2013. 9(3): p. 263–269.
  • 37. Jing, X., et al., Modelling and experimental analysis of the effects of run out, minimum chip thickness and elastic recovery on the cutting force in micro-end-milling.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020. 176: p. 105540.
  • 38. Xi, X., et al., A prediction model of the cutting force–induced deformation while considering the removed materialimpact.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2022. 119(3): p. 1579–1594.
  • 39. Yadav, D.K., et al., Optimization of surface roughness by design of experiment techniques during CNC milling machining.Materials Today:Proceedings, 2022. 52: p. 1919–1923.
  • 40. Meher, J., et al., Recent research development of CNC based milling machining conditions: A comprehensive review.Materials Today:Proceedings, 2022.
  • 41. Cheng, M., et al., Prediction and evaluation of surface roughness with hybrid kernel extreme learning machine and monitored tool wear.Journalof Manufacturing Processes, 2022. 84: p. 1541–1556.
  • 42. Chan, T.-C., H.-H. Lin, and S.V.V.S. Reddy, Prediction model of machining surface roughness for five-axis machine tool based on machine-tool structure performance.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022. 120(1): p. 237–249.
  • 43. Manivannan, R., R. Rajasekar, and M. Maheswaran. A review on online continuous tool wear monitoring system for machining process. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2022. AIP Publishing LLC.
  • 44. Wang, Y., et al., Online Surface Roughness Prediction for Assembly Interfaces of Vertical Tail Integrating Tool Wear under Variable Cutting Parameters.Sensors, 2022. 22(5): p. 1991.
  • 45. Deshpande, A.A. and M.A.A. Rehman, SurfaceRoughness Prediction using Empirical Modelling Techniques:-A Review.SAMRIDDHI: A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2022. 14(01 SPL): p. 108–117.
  • 46. Li, W., et al., A novel milling parameter optimization method based on improved deep reinforcement learning considering machining cost.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022. 84: p. 1362-1375.
  • 47. Perard, T., et al., Experimental investigation on surface integrity in a face milling operation.Procedia CIRP, 2022. 108: p. 400–405.
  • 48. Soori, M., et al., Minimization of surface roughness in 5-axis milling of turbine blades.Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2021: p. 1–18.
  • 49. Yang, J., et al., Multi-objective optimization of milling process: exploring trade-off among energy consumption, time consumption and surfaceroughness.International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2022: p. 1–20.
  • 50. Masooth, P.H.S., V. Jayakumar, and G. Bharathiraja, Experimental investigation on surface roughness in CNC end milling process by uncoated and TiAlN coated carbide end mill under dry conditions.Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020. 22: p. 726–736.
  • 51. Kant, G. and K.S. Sangwan, Prediction and optimization of machining parameters for minimizing power consumption and surfaceroughness in machining.Journal of cleaner production, 2014. 83: p. 151–164.
  • 52. Jia, S., et al., Multi-objective parameter optimization of CNC plane milling for sustainable manufacturing.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022: p. 1–22.
  • 53. Gupta, A., H. Singh, and A. Aggarwal, Taguchi-fuzzy multi output optimization (MOO) in high speed CNC turning of AISI P-20 tool steel.Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(6): p. 6822–6828.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-27307bba-7d44-4895-b128-7c037e0c24f5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.