Revitalizing public university innovativeness through learning organization

• Autorzy: Subiyakto Bambang , Widyanti Rahmi , Basuki , Syaharuddin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.27

Warianty tytułu

PL

Rewitalizacja innowacyjności publicznego uniwersytetu poprzez organizację edukacyjną

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

It is well-recognized from various business sectors that learning organization occupies a significant role in boosting the performance of organizations and is employed for gaining competitive advantage. Despite many studies in this management topic, there is a dearth of studies investigating public Higher Education. This study aims at investigating the implementation of learning organization at the individual, group, and organizational levels and the relationship with organizational innovativeness among academics in Indonesian public universities. Statistical results analyzed with regression analysis from 170 academics indicate significant positive associations between all variables. The finding of this research emphasizes the urgency to manage knowledge-based assets to accomplish the integration of personal knowledge to the organizational level. On the top priority, to gain competitive advantage, the public universities should create opportunities for continuous learning as well as promote a principle of inquiry and dialogue. Being one of the most essential sources of knowledge creation, it is imperative for higher education to implant organizational learning to accomplish literary greatness to contend satisfactorily in an unpredictable situation.

PL

Z różnych sektorów biznesu dobrze wiadomo, że organizacja ucząca się odgrywa znaczącą rolę w zwiększaniu wydajności organizacji i jest wykorzystywana do uzyskiwania przewagi konkurencyjnej. Pomimo wielu badań w tym temacie zarządzania, brakuje badań dotyczących publicznego szkolnictwa wyższego. Niniejsze badanie ma na celu zbadanie wdrożenia organizacji uczenia się na poziomie indywidualnym, grupowym i organizacyjnym oraz związku z innowacyjnością organizacyjną wśród naukowców na indonezyjskich uniwersytetach publicznych. Wyniki statystyczne analizowane za pomocą analizy regresji 170 naukowców wskazują na znaczące pozytywne powiązania między wszystkimi zmiennymi. Wyniki tych badań podkreślają pilną potrzebę zarządzania zasobami opartymi na wiedzy, aby osiągnąć integrację wiedzy osobistej z poziomem organizacyjnym. Nadrzędnym celem, aby uzyskać przewagę konkurencyjną, publiczne uniwersytety powinny stworzyć możliwości ciągłego uczenia się, a także promować zasadę dochodzenia i dialogu. Będąc jednym z najistotniejszych źródeł tworzenia wiedzy, konieczne jest, aby szkolnictwo wyższe zaimplementowało uczenie się organizacji, aby osiągnąć dużą zdolność do skutecznego radzenia sobie, w nieprzewidywalnych sytuacjach.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

learning organization; organizational innovativeness; public institution; higher education

PL

organizacja nauki; innowacyjność organizacyjna; instytucja publiczna; szkolnictwo wyższe

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 21, No. 1
• Strony: 369--381
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Subiyakto Bambang

• University of Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin Indonesia, Faculty of Teacher Training & Pedagogy

autor

Widyanti Rahmi

• Islamic University of Kalimantan, Banjarmasin, Indonesia, Faculty of Economics & Business, Indonesia

autor

Basuki

• Islamic University of Kalimantan, Banjarmasin, Indonesia, Faculty of Economics & Business, Indonesia

autor

Syaharuddin

• University of Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin Indonesia, Faculty of Teacher Training & Pedagogy

Bibliografia

• 1. Abbas, E. W., Hadi, S., & Rajiani, I. (2018). The prospective innovator in public university by scrutinizing particular personality traits. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 9-19.
• 2. Ahmad, N., Hoda, N., & Alahmari, F. (2020). Developing a Cloud-Based Mobile Learning Adoption Model to Promote Sustainable Education. Sustainability, 12(8), 3126.
• 3. Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3-15.
• 4. Brix, J. (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 113-127.
• 5. Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2018). The science of organizational design: fit between structure and coordination. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1-13.
• 6. Chen, I. S., Fung, P. K., & Yuen, S. S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities of logistics service providers: Antecedents and performance implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, (31), 4, 1058-1075.
• 7. Cierna, H., Sujová, E., Hbek, P., Horská, E., & Kapsdorferová, Z. (2017). Learning organization at higher education institutions in the EU: proposal for implementing philosophy of learning organization--results from research. Quality and Quantity, 51(3), 1305.
• 8. D’Angelo, A., & Presutti, M. (2019). SMEs international growth: The moderating role of experience on entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Business Review, 28(3), 613-624.
• 9. Freixanet, J., Rialp, A., & Churakova, I. (2020). How do innovation, internationalization, and organizational learning interact and co-evolve in small firms? a complex systems approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-34.
• 10. Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2018). Learning analytics platform in higher education in Japan. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 10(4), 469-484.
• 11. Ghaffari, S., Burgoyne, J., Shah, I., & Nazri, M. (2017). Perceptions of Learning Organization Dimensions among Non-academic Employees of Top Public Universities in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 11(1), 107-116.
• 12. Habtoor, A. S., Arshad, D. A., & Hassan, H. (2020). Learning Organization, Strategy Adoption and Knowledge Transfer as Factors for Improving Performance of Public universities: A Literature Review. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 8(1), 85-103.
• 13. Haight, V. D., & Marquardt, M. J. (2018). How chief learning officers build learning organizations. The Learning Organization, 25 (5), 331-343.
• 14. Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117 (3), 442-458.
• 15. Heo, H., Leppisaari, I., & Lee, O. (2018). Exploring learning culture in Finnish and South Korean classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 459-472.
• 16. Holba, A. M., Bahr, P. T., Birx, D. L., & Fischler, M. J. (2019). Integral Learning and Working: Becoming a Learning Organization. New Directions for Higher Education, 185, 85-99.
• 17. Hsu, S. W., & Lamb, P. (2020). Still in search of learning organization?. The Learning Organization, 27 (1), 31-41.
• 18. Hussein, N., Omar, S., Noordin, F., & Ishak, N. A. (2016). Learning organization culture, organizational performance and organizational innovativeness in a public institution of higher education in Malaysia: A preliminary study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 512-519.
• 19. Khunsoonthornkit, A., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2018). Structural equation model to assess the impact of learning organization and commitment on the performance of research organizations. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 457-462.
• 20. Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., & Almsafir, M. K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320-334.
• 21. Malik, P., & Garg, P. (2020). Learning organization and work engagement: The mediating role of employee resilience. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(8), 1071-1094.
• 22. Örtenblad, A. (2018). What does “learning organization” mean?. The Learning Organization, 25 (3), 150-158.
• 23. Rajiani, I., & Ismail, N. (2019). Management innovation in balancing technology innovation to harness universities performance in the era of community 4.0. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19, 309-321.
• 24. Rajiani, I., & Pypłacz, P. (2018). National culture as modality in managing the carbon economy in Southeast Asia. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 296-310.
• 25. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2019). Thanks coefficient alpha, we still need you!. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(1), 200-210.
• 26. Sarbaini, Jumadi, Abbas E., W., Rajiani, I. (2019). Managing e-learning in public universities by investigating the role of culture. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20 (1), 394-404.
• 27. Senge, P., & von Ameln, F. (2019). We are not in control - embrace uncertainty and trust in what emerges. Peter Senge on the legacy and future of Change Management. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 50(2), 123-127.
• 28. Serra, M., Psarra, S., & O'Brien, J. (2018). Social and physical characterization of urban contexts: Techniques and methods for quantification, classification and purposive sampling. Urban Planning, 3(1), 58-74.
• 29. Shin, J., & Choi, Y. K. (2019). Organizational innovativeness and its determinants in South Korean nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(1), 51-68.
• 30. Su, J., Zhang, S., & Ma, H. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental characteristics, and business model innovation: a configurational approach. Innovation, 1-23.
• 31. Vaikunthavasan, S., Jebarajakirthy, C., & Shankar, A. (2019). How to make higher education institutions innovative: An application of market orientation practices. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(3), 274-302.
• 32. van Acker, W., & Bouckaert, G. (2018). What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 249-268.
• 33. Watkins, K. E., & O’Neil, J. (2013). The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire (the DLOQ): A nontechnical manual. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15(2), 133-147.
• 34. Werlang, N. B., & Rossetto, C. R. (2019). The effects of organizational learning and innovativeness on organizational performance in the service provision sector. Gestão & Produção, 26(3), 1-18.
• 35. World University Rankings, 2020. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking. Accessed: May5, 2020.
• 36. Zhou, H., Deng, Z., Xia, Y., & Fu, M. (2016). A new sampling method in particle filter based on Pearson correlation coefficient. Neurocomputing, 216, 208-215.
• 37. Zhixing, Z. H. A. N. G. (2019). An Innovative Research on the Work of Financial Aiding in Colleges and Universities from the Perspective of Learning Organization Theory of New Generation. Journal of Higher Education, (2), 4.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).