Developing and ranking the strategies of Zarand power plant using quantitative strategic planning matrix and best-worst method

• Autorzy: Zangiabadi Leila , Moosavirad Seyed Hamed , Farahbakhsh Bahare , Mirhosseini Mitra

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.32933/ActaInnovations.44.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Developing the power plants in any country is considered an economic development strategy as it changes the country’s market despite the competitive pressures. However, to grow the electricity market, policymakers need to evaluate the domestic Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) of electric power plants. So, the necessity of a strategic plan for the power plants is inevitable to reach the goals such as eliminating the shortcomings, and meeting the desired criteria of an organization, such as more market share, acceptable profitability, customer satisfaction, increasing profit growth rate, and productivity through economic and cost-effective operations. Therefore, in this paper, the Zarand power plant in Iran is chosen as a case study to develop the associated strategies and rank them. A power plant strategic plan was generated by using a SWOT matrix. Then, the developed strategies were prioritized using a quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) and the best-worst method (BWM). The results confirm that developing the main product (electricity power), managing water consumption, and providing equipment are the most critical strategies for the Zarand power plant. Findings also demonstrated that the results of the BWM method are more accurate and correct than the QSPM method for prioritizing strategies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

power plant; strategic planning; multi-criteria decision-making; best worst method

PL

elektrownia; planowanie strategiczne; wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji; najlepsza najgorsza metoda

• Wydawca: Centrum Badań i Innowacji Pro-Akademia ; Ukrainian Academy of Sciences - Research and Development Centre for Industrial Problems of Development
• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: no. 44
• Strony: 64--76
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Zangiabadi Leila

• Zarand Power Plant Company, Zarand, Kerman, Iran Department of Industrial Engineering, Kerman Branch Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0615-3588

autor

Moosavirad Seyed Hamed

• Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6359-8044

autor

Farahbakhsh Bahare

• Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-308X

autor

Mirhosseini Mitra

• Energy and Environment Research Center, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-8138

Bibliografia

• [1] T.L. Stawar, Review of The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment., 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094560.
• [2] A. Moin Al-Dini, H. Bidokhti, Strategic Management, First Edit, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 2011.
• [3] H. Mintzberg, Lampel J., Quinn JB., Ghoshal S, The Strategy Process’. Harlow: Pearson Education., 2003.
• [4] M. Samadi, I. Fakher, Marketing Strategic Planning and Selecting Suitable Strategy by Using AHP Technique (Ahwaz Pipe Factory), Shahed Univ. Bimon. J. 16 (2009) 69–81.
• [5] M.T. Amini, N. Molaei, H. Torabi, Designing and developing the strategy of the Northern Drilling Company, Hum. Resour. Manag. Oil Ind. 4 (2010) 113–128.
• [6] M.H. Shakhsian, F. Hossein, Investigation On Top Management’s Role In Strategic Administration Of Low Cost Carriers, MODIRIAT-E-FARDA. 23 (2010) 11–23.
• [7] M.M. Salmani, M. Paleshi, Development of strategic planning using the David model (casestudy: North Wood Industry Company), in: 10th Int. Conf. Strateg. Manag. Tehran, 2013: pp. 42–56.
• [8] S.H. Moosavirad, Developing a Framework for Drawing a Strategy Map by Using the Combination of SWOT, QSPM and DEMATEL Methods: Case Study Nasb Niroo Company, Eng. Manag. Soft Comput. 2 (2017) 101–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22091/JEMSC.2016.767.
• [9] Z. Bagher, N. Safaei, Strategic human resource planning on the basis of BSC, Q. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Res. 8 (2016) 159–181.
• [10] P. Mohammadi Deh Cheshmeh, D. Mahdavi, Strategic planning for improvement of Shahrekord Transportation system placement by using a combination approaches of SWOT and QSPM, Geogr. Plan. 23 (2019) 245–264.
• [11] V. Wickramasinghe, S. Takano, Application of combined swot and analytic hierarchy process (ahp) for tourism revival strategic marketing planning: A case of sri lanka tourism, in: J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 2009: p. 16.
• [12] X. Shi, The future of ASEAN energy mix: A SWOT analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 (2016) 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.010.
• [13] P. Kumar, R. Kumar Singh, Strategic framework for developing resilience in Agri-Food Supply Chains during COVID 19 pandemic, Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. (2021) 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1908524.
• [14] Y.J. Kim, J.H. Lee, S.G. Lee, H.H. Lee, Developing sustainable competitive strategies in the beauty service industry: A SWOT-AHP approach, Sustain. 13 (2021) 10852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910852.
• [15] A. Aliewi, E. El-Sayed, A. Akbar, K. Hadi, M. Al-Rashed, Evaluation of desalination and other strategic management options using multi-criteria decision analysis in Kuwait, Desalination. 413 (2017) 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.03.006.
• [16] D. xiao Niu, Z. yun Song, X. li Xiao, Electric power substitution for coal in China: Status quo and SWOT analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70 (2017) 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.092.
• [17] A. Sharifian, H. Rezaei Dolatabadi, Ranking renewable energy strategic driving forces by synthetic approach of delphi, dematel and anp (fuzzy), J. Energy Plan. Policy Res. (2016) 143–167.
• [18] A. Ghasemi, H. Mehrmanesh, Strategic planning and risk analysis: Case Of operations, department of the great Tehran electricity distribution company, Q. J. Power Policy Plan. Res. 8 (2017) 175–198.
• [19] H. Aghababayi, A. Zarei, D. Feiz, Provide a new approach to evaluating organizational strategies, J. Strateg. Manag. Stud. 12 (2021) 205–219. https://doi.org/https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286853.1400.12.46.12.8.
• [20] F.R. David, F.R. David, T.Z. Kovács, A. Nábrádi, Emerging trends in strategic planning, Appl. Stud. Agribus. Commer. 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2020/1-2/3.
• [21] S.M. Jafari, S.H. Osuli, H. Shahriari, M. Shirazi Manesh, A.H. Fahim, Strategic and cultural tools: Inclusive quality management, sixth edit, Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services Institute, 2009.
• [22] B. Tate, J.H. Barnett, W.D. Wilsted, Strategic Management; Concepts and Cases., 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/2584115.
• [23] M.E. David, F.R. David, F.R. David, the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (Qspm) Applied To a Retail Computer Store, Coast. Bus. J. 8 (2009) 42–52.
• [24] A. Ghorbani, V. Raufirad, P. Rafiaani, H. Azadi, Ecotourism sustainable development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model: A case study of Kaji Namakzar Wetland, South Khorasan Province, Iran, Tour. Manag. Perspect. 16 (2015) 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.09.005.
• [25] S.K. Mallick, S. Rudra, R. Samanta, Sustainable ecotourism development using SWOT and QSPM approach: A study on Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu, Int. J. Geoheritage Park. 8 (2020) 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.06.001.
• [26] M.I. Walukow, S.A. Pangemanan, Developing Competitive Strategic Model Using Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Approach for Handicrafts Ceramic Industry in Pulutan, Minahasa Regency, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 211 (2015) 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.104.
• [27] F.R. David, The strategic planning matrix-a quantitative approach, Long Range Plann. 19 (1986) 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(86)90015-4.
• [28] J. Rezaei, A Concentration Ratio for Nonlinear Best Worst Method, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 19 (2020) 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500170.
• [29] J. Rezaei, Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega (United Kingdom). 53 (2015) 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).