Investigating the effect of social capital sub-dimensions on supply chain collaboration

• Autorzy: Khoa Vu Dinh , Anh Nguyen Thi Mai

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15439/2021KM27

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of our study is to take a closer look at three dimensions of social capital (SO) and explore the relationship between social capital sub-dimensions and three types of supply chain collaboration. This study provides an in-depth examination of social capital's effect on supply chain collaboration. We developed a comprehensive framework between cognitive, structural and relational capital dimensions and SC collaboration dimensions including information sharing, joint decision making, and benefit/risks sharing. The quantitative method was employed to investigate 249 firms located in Vietnam. The findings of this study provide some important implications for scholars and practitioners to establish and maintain a long-term relationship. The distinguishing between social capital sub-dimensions and collaboration can help managers to design collaborative strategies which will serve for the benefits of the entire supply chain.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social capital; collaboration; information sharing; decision making; system benefits

PL

kapitał społeczny; współpraca; dzielenie się informacjami; podejmowanie decyzji; korzyści; zysk

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne
• Czasopismo: Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 28
• Strony: 201--206
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Khoa Vu Dinh

• Faculty of Business Management Hanoi University of Industry Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Anh Nguyen Thi Mai

• Faculty of Business Management Hanoi University of Industry Hanoi, Vietnam

Bibliografia

• 1. Alghababsheh, M. & Gallear, D. J. J. O. B. E. 2021. Socially sustainable SC management and suppliers’ social performance: The role of social capital. 173, 855-875.
• 2. Baah, C., Opoku Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Issau, K., Ofori, D. & Faibil, D. 2021. Effect of information sharing in SCs: understanding the roles of SC visibility, agility, collaboration on SC performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, ahead-of-print.
• 3. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 1173.
• 4. Blonska, A., Storey, C., Rozemeijer, F., Wetzels, M. & De Ruyter, K. 2013. Decomposing the effect of supplier development on relationship benefits: The role of relational capital. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 1295-1306.
• 5. Cao, M. & Zhang, Q. 2011. SC collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 163-180.
• 6. Carey, S., Lawson, B. & Krause, D. R. 2011. Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 277-288.
• 7. Chang-Hun, L. & Byoung-Chun, H. 2018. The impact of buyer-supplier relationships’ social capital on bi-directional information sharing in the SC. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33, 325-336.
• 8. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. & Newsted, P. R. 2003. A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189-217.
• 9. Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., Noè, C. & Strozzi, F. J. S. C. M. A. I. J. 2019. Information sharing in SCs: a review of risks and opportunities using the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA).
• 10. Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., Hernán-González, R., Kujal, P. & Rassenti, S. 2016. To trust, or not to trust: Cognitive reflection in trust games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 20-27.
• 11. Crescenzi, R., Nathan, M. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2016. Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Research Policy, 45, 177-194.
• 12. Do Canto, N. R., Bossle, M. B., Vieira, L. M. & De Barcellos, M. D. 2021. SC collaboration for sustainability: a qualitative investigation of food SCs in Brazil. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32, 1210-1232.
• 13. Ha, B. C., Park, Y. K. & Cho, S. 2011. Suppliers' affective trust and trust in competency in buyers: Its effect on collaboration and logistics efficiency. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 56-77.
• 14. Handoko, I., Bresnen, M. & Nugroho, Y. 2018. Knowledge exchange and social capital in SCs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38, 90-108.
• 15. Kumar, G. 2021. Collaboration between SC partners: when does it matter? Evidence from collaborative profiles. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36, 1042-1057.
• 16. Kumar, G., Banerjee, R. N., Meena, P. L. & Ganguly, K. K. 2017. Joint planning and problem solving roles in SC collaboration. IIMB Management Review, 29, 45-57.
• 17. Lang, T. & Ramírez, R. 2017. Building new social capital with scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 51-65.
• 18. Lawson, B., Tyler, B. B. & Cousins, P. D. 2008. Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 446-460.
• 19. Li, Y., Ye, F. & Sheu, C. 2014. Social capital, information sharing and performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34, 1440-1462.
• 20. Liao, S.-H., Hu, D.-C. & DING, L.-W. 2017. Assessing the influence of SC collaboration value innovation, SC capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 143-153.
• 21. Mai Anh, N. T., Hui, L. & Khoa, V. D. 2018. Emerging Economies of Southeast Asia: Achieving and increasing radical innovations through collaborating with buyers and suppliers by fostering trust: the Case of Viet Nam. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 25, 357-372.
• 22. Morgan, R. & Hunt, S. 1994. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing, Journal of Marketing.
• 23. Mu, J., Peng, G. & Love, E. 2008. Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 86-100.
• 24. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
• 25. Nguyen, M. A. T., Lei, H., Vu, K. D. & Le, P. B. 2019. The role of cognitive proximity on SC collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: a study of a transition economy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34, 591-604.
• 26. Raweewan, M., Ferrell Jr, W. G. J. C. & Engineering, I. 2018. Information sharing in SC collaboration. 126, 269-281.
• 27. Sukoco, B. M., Hardi, H. & Qomariyah, A. 2018. Social capital, relational learning, and performance of suppliers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30, 417-437.
• 28. Thi Mai Anh, N. 2019. Relational capital and SC collaboration for radical and incremental innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31, 1076-1094.
• 29. Thi Mai Anh, N., Hui, L., Khoa Vu, D. & Mehmood, S. 2019. Relational capital and SC collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: An empirical study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31, 1076-1094.
• 30. Tsai, W. P. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.
• 31. Villena, V. H., Revilla, E. & Choi, T. Y. 2011. The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 561-576.
• 32. Wang, Y. 2016. Investigating dynamic capabilities of family businesses in China: a social capital perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23, 1057-1080.
• 33. Wu, L. & Chiu, M.-L. J. I. J. O. I. M. 2018. Examining SC collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives. 39, 5-19.
• 34. Yang, Z., Lin, Y. J. S. P. & Consumption 2020. The effects of SC collaboration on green innovation performance: An interpretive structural modeling analysis. 23, 1-10.
• 35. Yao, L., Yu, Z. & Songyue, Z. 2016. Social capital, portfolio management capability and exploratory innovation: evidence from China. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31, 794-807.
• 36. Yim, B. & Leem, B. 2013. The effect of the SC social capital. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113, 324-349.

Uwagi

1. Preface

2. Session: International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation