Interinstitutional dimension concerning planning, training and force engagement as response to the hybrid war

• Autorzy: Ioniţă D. , Pînzariu S. , Bârsan G. , Raţiu A. , Moşteanu D.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0010.7217

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The proliferation of risks and unconventional threats, especially the hybrid ones, requires the finding of integrated security solutions, both nationally and internationally. The beginning of the millennium reveals new ideas for conducting military conflicts. Thus, within the future confrontations characterized by a high degree of complexity, awareness of the need and development of some mechanisms necessary for the inter-institutional integration and the effects of the actions of all power tools, military and civilian, is a priority of major significance. In this regard, the present article presents some mechanisms, guidelines and methods that could lead to inter-institutional integration.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

hybrid warfare; inter-institutional integration; planning and force engagement

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Akademii Wojsk Lądowych imienia generała Tadeusza Kościuszki
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Nr 4
• Strony: 37--48
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ioniţă D.

• Ministry of Defence, General Staff Headquarter, 110 Izvor Street, Bucharest, Romania

autor

Pînzariu S.

• National Defence University, Bucharest, Romania

autor

Bârsan G.

• Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania

autor

Raţiu A.

• Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania

autor

Moşteanu D.

• Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania

Bibliografia

• 1. Alexandrescu G., Văduva G., Infrastructuri critice. Pericole, ameninţări la adresa acestora. Sisteme de protecţie, Bucharest, ”Carol I” National Defence University Publishing House, 2006.
• 2. Bârsan G., Giurgiu L., Căruţaşu V., Moşteanu D., Multi-objective Optimization within the Military Decision Making Process. [in:] AKS International Conference Army and Knowledge Society, 2011, Brno, p. 9-16, published by University of Defence Brno, Czech Republic.
• 3. BI-SC (Bi-Strategic Commands), Input to a New NATO Capstone Concept for the Military Contribution to Countering Hybrid Threats, 2010.
• 4. Cheţe E., Raţiu A., Ciupei I., Transformarea militară. Coordonate politico-militare şi doctrinare, Bucureşti, Centrul Tehnic Editorial al Armatei Publishing House, 2009, p. 266 (in Romanian)
• 5. Holism– conception that interprets the irreducibility thesis of the whole in its parts, highlighting the importance of the completeness, in our case, of the actions within the international missions.
• 6. Mockaitis T.R., British Counterinsurgency in The Post Imperial Era. War, armed forces, and society, Manchester University Press, 1995, p. 23.
• 7. Retired officer from the Marines Corps of the US Army, renowned researcher at the National University of Defense of the United States of America, is among the first authors who theorized hybrid war concept.
• 8. Hoffman G.F., Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, Arlington, Virginia, Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007, p. 14.
• 9. Hoffman G.F., Hybrid vs. compound war. [in:] Armed Forces Journal, October 1, 2009, [online]. [available: 03.03.2017]. Available on the Internet: http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/hybrid-vs-compound-war.
• 10. Hoffman G. Frank, Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, Arlington, Virginia, Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007.
• 11. Latawski Paul., The Inherent Tensions in Military Doctrine. [in:] Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, Occasional Papers. Nr. 5, 2011, p. 3, [online]. [available: 03.03.2017]. Available on the Internet: https://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/RMAS_Occasional_Paper_5.pdf
• 12. Latawski P., The Inherent Tensions in Military Doctrine, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst Occasional Papers. No. 5, 2011.
• 13. Mockaitis R. Thomas, British Counterinsurgency in The Post Imperial Era. War, armed forces, and society, Manchester University Press, 1995.
• 14. Moteff J., Copeland C., Fischer J., Resources, Science, and Industry Division, Critical Infrastructures: What Makes an Infrastructure Critical?, Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2003.
• 15. Pirnie R.B., Civilian and military: a better coordination’s building, Santa Monica, 1998, p. 22, Apud, Roman V., Cheţe E., Popescu C., Acţiuni şi efecte interagenţii în situaţii de criză şi de conflict, ”Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy Publishing House, Sibiu, 2012, p. 93. (in Romanian)
• 16. Raţiu A., Comprehensive Integration Policy in Crisis Management Operations. [in:] ”Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy Review, Sibiu, no. 4, 2013, p. 359.
• 17. Strategia de Transformate a Armatei României, Bucureşti (Strategy for the Romani-an Armed Forces Transformation), 2007.
• 18. Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of The Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, adopted by the Heads of States and Governments of the Member States in Lisbon 2010.
• 19. Strategia de transformare Armatei României, (The Strategy of Romanian Armed Forces Transformation), Bucharest, 2007, p. 24. (in Romanian)
• 20. Vasile P., Conflictele secolului XXI. Proiecţii în spaţiul strategic, Bucharest, Militară Publishing House, 1999.
• 21. Vasile R., Cheţe E., Popescu Constantin, Acţiuni şi efecte interagenţii în situaţii de criză şi de conflict, Sibiu, ”Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy Publishing House, 2012.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).