Mitigating the seismic pounding of multi-story buildings in series using linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers

• Autorzy: Elwardany Hytham , Jankowski Robert , Seleemah Ayman

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-021-00249-9

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Seismic-induced pounding between adjacent buildings may have serious consequences, ranging from minor damage up to total collapse. Therefore, researchers try to mitigate the pounding problem using different methods, such as coupling the adjacent buildings with stiff beams, connecting them using viscoelastic links, and installing damping devices in each building individually. In the current paper, the effect of using linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers to mitigate the mutual pounding between a series of structures is investigated. Nonlinear finite-element analysis of a series of adjacent steel buildings equipped with damping devices was conducted. Contact surfaces with both contactor and target were used to model the mutual pounding. The results indicate that the use of linear or nonlinear dampers leads to the significant reduction in the response of adjacent buildings in series. Moreover, the substantial improvement of the performance of buildings has been observed for almost all stories. From the design point of view, it is concluded that dampers implemented in adjacent buildings should be designed to resist maximum force of 6.20 or 1.90 times the design independent force in the case of using linear or nonlinear fluid viscous dampers, respectively. Also, designers should pay attention to the design of the structural elements surrounding dampers, because considerable forces due to pounding may occur in the dampers at the maximum displaced position of the structure.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

series of structures; structural pounding; linear fluid viscous dampers; nonlinear fluid viscous dampers; earthquakes; contact surfaces

PL

trzęsienie ziemi; badania sejsmiczne; katastrofa budowlana

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 21, no. 4
• Strony: 1--16
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Elwardany Hytham

• Faculty of Engineering, Structural Engineering Department, Delta University for Science and Technology, Belkas, Egypt

autor

Jankowski Robert

• Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-115X

autor

Seleemah Ayman

• Faculty of Engineering, Structural Engineering Department, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Bibliografia

• [1] Vasiliadis L, Elenas A. Performance of school buildings during the Athens earthquake of 7 September 1999. In: 12th European conference on earthquake engineering. 2002, paper ref. 264.
• [2] Rosenblueth E, Meli R. The 1985 earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City. Concr Int. 1986;8:23–34.
• [3] Bertero VV, Collins RG. Investigation of the failures of the Olive View stair towers during the San Fernando earthquake and their implications on seismic design. EERC report No. 73–26. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1973.
• [4] Kasai K, Maison BF. Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Eng Struct. 1997;19:195–207.
• [5] Laterza M, et al. Modeling of gravity-designed RC sub-assemblages subjected to lateral loads. Eng Struct. 2017;130:242–60.
• [6] Melo J, et al. Cyclic response of RC beam-column joints reinforced with plain bars: an experimental testing campaign. The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15 WCEE), 24–28 September 2012.
• [7] Braga F, et al. Hardening slip model for reinforcing steel bars. Earthq Struct. 2015;9(3):503–39.
• [8] Fernandes C, et al. Cyclic behavior of substandard reinforced concrete beam-column joints with plain bars. ACI Struct J. 2013;110(1):137–48.
• [9] Di Lorenzo G, et al. State-of-the-art on steel exoskeletons for seismic retrofit of existing RC buildings. Ingegneria Sismica. 2020;37(1):33–50.
• [10] D’Amato M, et al. Validation of a modified steel bar model incorporating bond-slip for seismic assessment of concrete structures. J Struct Eng ASCE. 2012;138(11):1351–60.
• [11] Anagnostopoulos SA. Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1988;16:443–56.
• [12] Jankowski R. Impact force spectrum for damage assessment of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Key Eng Mater. 2005;293–294:711–8.
• [13] Miari M, Choong KK, Jankowski R. Seismic pounding between adjacent buildings: identification of parameters, soil interaction issues and mitigation measures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019;121:135–50.
• [14] Anagnostopoulos SA, Spiliopoulos KV. An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1992;21:289–302.
• [15] Maison BF, Kasai K. Dynamics of pounding when two buildings collide. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1992;21(9):771–86.
• [16] Karayannis CG, Favvata MJ. Earthquake-induced interaction between adjacent reinforced concrete structures with non-equal heights. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2005;34(1):1–20.
• [17] Mahmoud S, Jankowski R. Elastic and inelastic multi-storey buildings under earthquake excitation with the effect of pounding. J Appl Sci. 2009;9(18):3250–62.
• [18] Raheem SEA. Seismic pounding between adjacent building structures. Electron J Struct Eng. 2006;6:66–74.
• [19] Papadrakakis M, Apostolopoulou C, Zacharopoulos A, Bitzarakis S. Three-dimensional simulation of structural pounding during earthquakes. J Eng Mech. 1996;122:423–31.
• [20] Chau KT, Wei XX, Guo X, Shen CY. Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2003;32:537–54.
• [21] Jankowski R, Seleemah A, El-Khoriby S, Elwardany H. Experimental study on pounding between structures during damaging earthquakes. Key Eng Mater. 2015;627:249–52.
• [22] El-Khoriby S., Seleemah A., Elwardany H., Jankowski R. Experimental and numerical study on pounding of structures in series. In: Advances in structural engineering: dynamics. India: Springer; 2015;2:1073–1089 (ISBN: 978-81-322-2192-0).
• [23] Crozet V, Politopoulos I, Chaudat T. Shake table tests of structures subject to pounding. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2019;48(10):1156–73.
• [24] Naderpour H, Naji N, Burkacki D, Jankowski R. Seismic response of high-rise buildings equipped with base isolation and non-traditional tuned mass dampers. Appl Sci. 2019;9(6):1201.
• [25] Monteiro M. Energy dissipation systems for buildings. Fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt, Corpus ID: 53343249, 2011.
• [26] Kasai K, Jeng V, Patel PC, Munshi JA, Maison BF. Seismic pounding effects-survey and analysis. Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 7. Madrid, Spain, 19–24, July 1992, pp. 3893–3898.
• [27] Xu YL, He Q, Ko JM. Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Eng Struct. 1999;21:135–48.
• [28] Ni YQ, Ko JM, Ying ZG. Random seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings coupled with non-linear hysteretic dampers. J Sound Vib. 2001;246:403–17.
• [29] Westermo BD. The dynamics of interstructural connection to prevent pounding. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1989;18:687–99.
• [30] Bhaskararao AV, Jangid RS. seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with dampers. 13th World conference on earthquake engineering. Canada: Vancouver, B.C.; 1–6 August 2004, Paper No. 3143.
• [31] Uz ME, Hadi MNS. Dynamic analysis of adjacent buildings connected by fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake resistant engineering structures, WIT Transaction on The Built Environment, 2009.
• [32] Jankowski R, Mahmoud S. Linking of adjacent three-storey buildings for mitigation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. 2016;14(11):3075–97.
• [33] Passoni C, Belleri A, Marini A, Riva P. Existing structures connected with dampers: state of the art and future developments. Second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, Aug 25–29 2014.
• [34] Gattulli V, Lepidi M, Potenza F, Ceci AM. Nonlinear viscous dampers interconnecting adjacent structures for seismic retrofitting. Eighth European conference on structural dynamics 2011, Belgium.
• [35] Elwardany H, Seleemah A, Jankowski R. Seismic pounding behavior of multi-story buildings in series considering the effect of infill panels. Eng Struct. 2017;144:139–50.
• [36] Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-10 June 2010.
• [37] ADINA R&D, Inc. Automatic dynamic incremental nonlinear analysis. Reference Manual June 2010.
• [38] Bathe KJ, Chaudhary A. A solution method for planar and axisymmetric contact problems. Int J Number Method Eng. 1985;21:65–88.
• [39] Elwardany H, Seleemah A, Jankowski R, El-khoriby S. Influence of soil-structure interaction on seismic pounding between steel frame buildings considering the effect of infill panels. Bull Earthq Eng. 2019;17(11):6165–202.
• [40] Sołtysik B, Jankowski R. Non-linear strain rate analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between steel buildings. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 2013;6(3):429–33.
• [41] Eurocode 3 (EN1993-1-5) Design of steel structures-part 1–5: plated structural elements, EN 1993-1-5:2006, incorporating corrigendum April 2009, 2006.
• [42] Seleemah A, Constantinou MC. Investigation of seismic response of buildings with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers, Report No. NCEER-1997-0004, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, New York, USA.
• [43] McVitty W, Taylor A. Structures with supplemental energy dissipation devices. FEMA P-1051, NEHRP recommended provisions: design examples, Chapter 16, pp. 1–42, July 2016.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)