Kodeksy postępowania z dostawcami – proces tworzenia, dyfuzja wiedzy i kalkulacja kosztów

• Autorzy: Maryniak A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Supplier codes of conduct – the process of making, knowledge diffusion and calculation of costs

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Główny przedmiot rozważań stanowi problematyka zarządzania kodeksami postępowania. Jest to rzadki obszar dyskusji zarówno w literaturze polskiej, jak i światowej. Tematyka poruszanych zagadnień wpisuje się w szerszy kontekst dotyczący zrównoważonych łańcuchów dostaw i działań społecznie odpowiedzialnych. Oryginalne studium badawcze wypełnia lukę empiryczną w zakresie tworzenia kodeksów, kosztów ich obsługi oraz dyfuzji wiedzy. Zebrany materiału badawczy od 52 dużych i średnich przedsiębiorstw produkcyjnych zlokalizowanych w Polsce posłużył do sformułowania konkluzji i wytyczenia przyszłych kierunków badawczych. Na podstawie badań między innymi ustalono, że kodeksy postępowania tworzone są przede wszystkim na bazie własnych doświadczeń. Tym samym dowiedziono, że w obszarze omawianych kodeksów przedsiębiorstwa cechuje najniższy poziom generacji odpowiedzialnego zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw - tzw. RSCM 1.0. Stwierdzono również, że trudności dotyczące kalkulacji kosztów audytowania i monitorowania działań, będących konsekwencją przyjętych kodeksów postępowania, wynikają przede wszystkim ze złożoności i różnorodności systemów zarządzania nimi.

EN

Our main considerations were the issues related to the management of the codes of conduct. It is a rarely discussed area both in the Polish as well as in the global literature. The issues are a part of a broader context regarding both sustainable supply chains and social responsible actions. This original research study bridges the empirical gap concerning the codes of conduct, their costs and knowledge diffusion. The research material acquired from 52 large and medium production enterprises localized in Poland allowed to formulate the conclusions and to develop the future research directions. Based on the research, we determined that the codes of conduct are made mostly on the basis of own experience. At the same time, we proved that in the area of the discussed conducts of enterprises, there was the lowest level of the generation of responsible supply chain management – the so-called X. We also claim that the difficulties regarded the calculation of the costs of auditing and monitoring actions, which are the consequences of the applied codes of conduct, result mainly from the complexity and diversity of their managing systems.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

kodeks postępowania; dostawca; zrównoważony łańcuch dostaw; społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu

EN

code of conduct; supplier; sustainable supply chain; corporate social responsibility

• Wydawca: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne SA
• Czasopismo: Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 10--19
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Maryniak A.

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Wydział Zarządzania, Katedra Logistyki i Transportu

Bibliografia

• Awaysheh, A., Klassen, R.D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1246-1268.
• Bondy, K.D. Matten, Moon, J. (2004). The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A three country comparative study. Business and Society Review, 109(A), 449-477.
• Closs, D., Speier, C. Meacham, N. (2011). Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: the role of supply chain management. Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 101-116.
• Dou, Y., Sarkis, J. (2010). A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 567-592.
• Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers' compliance with MNCs' codes of conduct: Behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 45-62.
• Emmelhainz, M.A., Adams, R.J. (1999). The apparel industry response to „sweatshop” concerns: a review and analysis of codes of conduct. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, (35), 51-57.
• GLOBAL CSR and Copenhagen Business School (2011). Changing Course — A study into Responsible Supply Chain Management. Sub-Reports and Appendices. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
• Hu, X. (2006). Corporate Codes of Conduct and Labour Related Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysing the Self Regulatory Mechanisms of Multinational Enterprises and their Impacts to Developing Countries. The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training; http://www.jil.go.jp/profile/documents/Hu.pdf (dostęp 10.01.2017).
• Jenkins, R. (2001). Corporate Codes of Conduct Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
• Jiang, B. (2009a). Implementing Supplier Codes of Conduct in Global Supply Chains: Process Explanations from Theoretic and Empirical Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, §5(1), 77-92.
• Jiang, B. (2009b). The effects of interorganizational governance on supplier's compliance with SCC: An empirical examination of compliant and non-compliant suppliers. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 267-280.
• Keller, H. (2008). Corporate Codes of Conduct and their Implementation: the Question of Legitimacy. W: R. Wolfrum, V. Roeben (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law (219-298), Berlin — Heidelberg — New York: Springer.
• Kogg, B. (2003). Power and incentives in environmental supply chain management. W: S. Seuring, M. Muller, M. Goldbach, U. Schneidewind (eds.), Strategy and organization in supply chains, Heidelberg: Springer, 65-81.
• Kolk, A., van Tulder, R., Welters, C. (1999). International codes of conduct and corporate social responsibility: Can transnational corporations regulate themselves? Transnational Corporations, (8), 143-180.
• Krueger,D.A. (2008). The ethics of global supply chains in China — convergences of east and west. Journal of Business Ethics, (79), 113-120. .
• Liu, Ch. Ch., Yu, Y.H., Wernick, I.K., Chang, Ch.Y. (2015). Using the Electronic Industry Code of Conduct to Evaluate Green Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study of Taiwan's Computer Industry. Sustainability, 7 (3), 2787-2803.
• Locke, R.M. Amengual, M., Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37 (3), 319-351.
• Magnan, G.M., Fawcett, S.E., Alcantar, T.N., Henshaw, K. (2011). On supply chains and reputation risk: Tracking changes in supplier codes of conduct. International Journal of Procurement Management, 4 (6), 567-588.
• Maignan, I., Hillebrand, B., McAlister, D. (2002). Managing socially-responsible buying: how to integrate non-economic criteria into the purchasing process. European Management Journal, 20(6), 641-648.
• Maloni, M.J., Brown, M.E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, (68), 35-52.
• Mamic, I. (2005). Managing global supply chain: the sports footwear, apparel and retail sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 81-100.
• Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T.E., Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 478-496.
• Moran, T.H. (2009). The UN and Transnational Corporations: From Code of Conduct to Global Compact. Transnational Corporations, 18(2), 91-112.
• OECD (2001). Corporate responsibility — private initiatives and public goal. Paris: OECD Publications.
• Oèhmen, J., De Nardo, M., Schonsleben, P., Boutellier, R. (2010). Supplier code of conduct — state-of-the-art and customisation in the electronics industry, Production Planning & Control, 21 (7). 664-679.
• O'Rourke, D. (2002). Monitoring the Monitors: A Critique of Corporate Third-Party Labor Monitoring. W: J. Jenkins, R. Pearson, G. Seyfang (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Ethical Trade: Codes of Conduct in the Global Economy (196-208). London: Earthscan.
• Pedersen, E.R., Andersen, M. (2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3/4), 228-240.
• Razzaque, M.A., Hwee, T.P. (2002). Ethics and purchasing dilemma: a Singaporean view. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 307-326.
• Roberts, S. (2003). Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(213), 159-170.
• Rosen, A.S., Jaffe, M., Perez-Lopez, J. (1996). The Apparel Industry and Codes of Conduct: A Solution to the International Child Labor Problem, U.S. Dept, of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs; http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=child (dostęp 11.12.2017).
• Sauvant, K.P. (2015). The Negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations. The Journal of World Investment and Trade, 16(1), 11-87.
• Schleper, M.C., Busse, C. (2013). Toward a standardized supplier code of ethics: Development of a design concept based on diffusion of innovation theory. Logistics Research, 6 (4), 187-216.
• Tachizawa, E.M., Wong, C.Y. (2015). The Performance of Green Supply Chain Management Governance Mechanisms: A Supply Network and Complexity Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18-32.
• Thorne, D.M., Quinn, F.F. (2016). Private Governance in the Supply Chain., Journal of Marketing Channels, 23(1-2), 11-21.
• Winstanley, D., Clark, J., Leeson, H. (2002). Approaches to child labour in the supply chain. Business Ethics: A European Review, (11), 210-223.
• Yu, X. (2015). Upholding labour standards through corporate social responsibility policies in China. Global Social Policy, 15(2), 167-187.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).