How Do You Measure Green Culture in Shipping? The Search for a Tool Through Interviews with Swedish Seafarers

• Autorzy: Hammander M. , Karlsson P. , Österman C. , Hult C.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.09.04.06

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Today, the shipping industry faces important environmental challenges to reduce the impact of sea transport to the marine environment. In order to enhance compliance and encourage safe and efficient maritime operations, the implementation of a safety culture in both shore organisation and on board ships has been advocated. Similarly, it can be argued that a conscious ‘greening’ of an organisation’s culture may be necessary in order to meet legislative and societal demands, as well as embrace environmentally responsible values, beliefs and behaviours. The present pilot study describes the development and evaluation of a model designed to capture attitudes and perception among seafarers with regards to proactive environmental work in the shipping industry. The overall aim of the model is to enable measurement of the extent to which a ‘green culture’ is present within the shipping industry, and to identify factors that either facilitate or act as barriers to a green culture. Evaluation of the model was done through qualitative individual and focus group interviews with, in all, 13 active Swedish seafarers during the autumn of 2014. The findings show that the model captures the sought after mechanisms fairly well and shows some promise. Future work is needed to further refine and test the model in a larger setting, in order to provide a robust picture of the seafarers’ view on ‘green’ shipping.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Green Culture in Shipping; Green Culture; Seafarers; Swedish; Marine Environment; Safety Culture; Shipping Industry; Commitment; learning; Empowerment and Communication (CLEC); Environmental Management System (EMS)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 9, no. 4
• Strony: 501--509
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Hammander M.

• Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Sweden

autor

Karlsson P.

• Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Sweden

autor

Österman C.

• Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Sweden

autor

Hult C.

• Kalmar Maritime Academy, Linnaeus University, Sweden

Bibliografia

• 1 Angell, L. C., & Klassen, R. D., (1999). Integrating Environmental Issues into the Mainstream: An Agenda for Research in Operations Management’, Journal of Operations and Production Management, 11(3): 63–76.
• 2 Cariou, P. (2011). Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping? Trans‐portation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 260‐264.
• 3 Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H., (2000). Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 627–41.
• 4 Fernández, E., Junquera, B., & Ordiz, M., (2003). Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(4), pp.634–656.
• 5 Ferraro, G., et al., (2009). Long term monitoring of oil spills in European seas. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(3), pp.627–645.
• 6 Giziakis, C., & Christodoulou, A., (2012). Environmental awareness and practice concerning maritime air emissions: the case of the Greek shipping industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(3), 353‐368.
• 7 Guldenmund, F. W., (2010). (Mis)understanding Safety Culture and Its Relationship to Safety Management. Risk analysis?: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 30(10), pp.1466–80.
• 8 Handfield, et al., (2001). Integrating Environmental Concerns into the Design Process: The Gap between Theory and Practice, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 18(2), 189–208.
• 9 Harris, C., Lloyd, C., & Crane, A., (2002). The greening of organizational culture: Management views on the depth, degree and diffusion of change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(3), pp.214 – 234.
• 10 Hart, S. L., (1995). A Natural Resource‐Based View of the Firm, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
• 11 Hjelle, H. M., & Fridell, E., (2012). When is Short Sea Shipping Environmentally Competitive?, Environmental Health ‐ Emerging Issues and Practice, Prof. Jacques Oosthuizen (Ed.), ISBN: 978‐953‐307‐ 854‐ 0.
• 12 Hjorth, F., (2013). Safety Culture in the Baltic Sea: A study of Maritime Safety, Safety Culture and Working Conditions Aboard Vessels, Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters Weintrit, Adam & Neumann, Tomasz (Ed.), (pp. 233‐241), Leiden: CRC Press.
• 13 Hudson, P., (2007). Implementing a safety culture in a major multi‐national. Safety Science, 45(6), pp.697–722. Kongsvik, T. O., Storkersen, K. V., & Antonsen, S., (2013). The relationship between regulation, safety management systems and safety culture in the maritime industry. Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon, 467.
• 14 Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299.
• 15 Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2009). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• 16 Kvale, S. (1997). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• 17 Lai, K. H., et al., (2011). Green shipping practices in the shipping industry: Conceptualization, adoption, and implications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), pp.631–638.
• 18 Lambert, S., & Loiselle, C. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2), 228‐237.
• 19 Longva, T., et al., (2010). Determining a required energy efficiency design index level for new ships based on a cost‐effectiveness criterion. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(2), pp.129–143.
• 20 Lun, Y. H. V., et al., (2013). Green shipping practices and firm performance. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(2), pp.134–148.
• 21 Millard, D., (2011). Management learning and the greening of SMEs: Moving beyond problem‐solving, Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 25(2), pp. 178‐195.
• 22 Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. London: Ashgate.?
• 23 Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A., (1997). ‘A Resource‐Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal, 40: 534–59.
• 24 Saharuddin, A., Osnin, A. & Balaji, R., (2012). Human Factors as Causes for Shipboard Oil Pollution Violations. International jurnal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transport, 6(1), pp.93–99.
• 25 Sanderlands, G., (1994) ‘3M Find Brass in Muck’, Management Decision, 32(5), 63–4.
• 26 Smith, T. W. P. et al., (2014). Third IMO GHG Study 2014, International Maritime Organization (IMO) London.
• 27 Westrum, R., 2004. A typology of organisational cultures. Quality & safety in health care, 13(2), pp. ii22–i27.
• 28 Westrum, R., (2014). The study of information flow: A personal journey. Safety Science, 67, pp.58–63.
• 29 Wuisan, L., et al., (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance: A case study of the Clean Shipping Project. Marine Policy, 36(1), pp.165–173.