Urbanistyka agrarna: przejściowa moda czy szansa na zrównoważoną urbanizację?

• Autorzy: Jeleński Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/tkuia.2020.135420

Warianty tytułu

EN

Agricultural urbanism: temporary mode or a chance for the sustainable city?

• Języki publikacji: PL EN

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł przedstawia analizę różnych koncepcji wprowadzania i integracji agrokultury ze współczesnymi społecznościami miejskimi. Nowe źródła, akademickie i praktyczne, dają wiarygodne informacje do wstępnych, holistycznych ocen scenariuszy upraw w różnych kontekstach miasta. Wskazują pożytki społeczne oraz ogólnie korzystny wpływ upraw miejskich na środowisko. W artykule wymieniono nowe metody i techniki ocen społeczno-środowiskowych, a także wskazano na potrzebę opracowania nowych wskaźników i standardów zarządzania miejską przestrzenią zieloną.

EN

The article analyses different concepts of combining and interaction of agriculture with urban society. New academic and practice-based sources provide reliable information for early-stage holistic assessment of farming scenarios in various urban contexts. They acknowledge considerable social benefits and generally beneficial impact of urban farming. The new surveying methods and techniques to assess social and environmental impacts are mentioned in the article as well as the need of developing new indicators and standards which could be applied to improve the management of the urban green space.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

farmy miejskie; ogrody miejskie; rozwiązania inspirowane naturą; NBS; urbanistyka agrarna; usługi ekosystemów; zdrowie

EN

agrarian urbanism; environmental services; health; Nature Based Solutions; NBS; urban farms

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Krakowie ; Politechnika Krakowska, Wydział Architektury
• Czasopismo: Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury Oddział PAN w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: T. 48
• Strony: 299--314
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Jeleński Tomasz

• Cracow University of Technology, International Centre of Education
• Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture

Bibliografia

• Cassidy, E.S. et al. (2013), ‘Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare’, Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), p. 034015, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034015.
• Despommier, D. (2009), ‘The rise of vertical farms’, Scientific American, 301(5), pp. 80–87.
• Duany, A. and DPZ (2011), Garden Cities: Theory & Practice of Agrarian Urbanism, London: The Prince’s Foundation for the Built Environment.
• Eklipse mechanism (2017), [online:] http://www.eklipse-mechanism.eu/ongoing_processes (accessed: 8.11.2017).
• Endreny, T. et al. (2017), ‘Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing’, Ecological Modelling, 360, pp. 328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.016.
• Farr, D. (2008), Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design With Nature, 1st edition, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2011) The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture: Managing systems at risk. New York: FAO and Earthscan.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2013) FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013: World Food and Agriculture, Rome, [online:] http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e.PDF (accessed: 7.02.2018)-
• Giergiczny, M., Kronenberg, J. (2012), ‘Jak wycenić wartość przyrody w mieście? Wycena drzew przyulicznych’, Przyroda w mieście: usługi ekosystemów - niewykorzystany potencjał miast (seria wyd. Zrównoważony rozwój: zastosowania, 3), Fundacja Sendzimira, s. 73–89.
• GREEN SURGE (2017), Urban Green Infrastructure: Connecting People and Nature for Sustainable Cities. A Summary for Policy Makers, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, [online:] http://greensurge.eu/about/ (accessed: 24.02.2018).
• H. R. H. Prince of Wales, Juniper, T., Skelly, I. (2010), Harmony: A New Way of Looking at Our World, UK ed. edition, London: HarperCollins.
• International Organization for Standardization (2014) ISO 37120 - Sustainable development of communities: Indicators for city services and quality of life - briefng note: the first ISO
• International Standard on city indicators, [online:] https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/37120_briefing_note.pdf (accessed: 8.02.2018).
• International Organization for Standardization (2016a) ISO 37101: Sustainable development in communities, Geneva: ISO. International Organization for Standardization (2016b) ISO 37101:2016 - Sustainable development in communities - Management system for sustainable development - Requirements with guidance for use, [online:] https://www.iso.org/standard/61885.html (accessed: 8.02.2018).
• Krier, L. (2011), The Architecture of Community 2nd None ed. edition, Washington, DC: Island Press.
• Kummu, M. et al. (2012), ‘Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use’, Science of The Total Environment, 438, pp. 477–489, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092.
• Low Carbon Oxford (2012), Food Printing Oxford: How to feed a City, Oxford, [online:] http://www.landshare.org/uploads/7/5/4/1/7541639/food_printing_web.pdf.
• Martin, G. et al. (2014), ‘The Sustainability Contributions of Urban Agriculture: Exploring a community garden and a community farm’, [in:] Schenck, R. and Huizenga, D. (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), 8–10 October 2014, San Francisco, USA, San Francisco, USA: ACLCA, Vashon, WA, USA, pp. 752–760, [online:] http://lcafood2014.org/papers/277. pdf; http://lcacenter.org/lcafood2014/proceedings/LCA_ Food_2014_Proceedings.pdf.
• Martin, G., Clift, R., Christie, I. (2016), ‘Urban Cultivation and Its Contributions to Sustainability: Nibbles of Food but Oodles of Social Capital’, Sustainability, 8(5), p. 409, doi: 10.3390/su8050409.
• NYC Parks (no date) NYC Parks Street Tree Map, [online:] http://nyc.gov/parks/treemap (accessed: 7.02.2018).
• Oppla (2017), Marketplace, [online:] https://www.oppla.eu/marketplace (accessed: 24.02.2018).
• Our World in Data (2018), Yields and Land Use in Agriculture, [online:] https://ourworldindata.org/yields-and-land-use-in-agriculture (accessed: 8.02.2018).
• RAMSES: Science for Cities in Transition (2017), Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development for Cities: Final publishable summary report, Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), [online:]: http://www.ramses-cities.eu/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/fe_file_repository/01_Workpackage_1/RAMSES_FINAL_REPORT.pdf&t=1519547804&hash=3cccd693b85a68c796ea85e56ed28a3991fbc69c (accessed: 24.02.2018).
• Salle, J. de la, Holland, M. (eds) (2010), Agricultural Urbanism: Handbook for Building Sustainable Food & Agric Systems in 21st Century Cities, Libri Publishing.
• Sanyé-Mengual, E. et al. (2013), ‘Environmental analysis of the logistics of agricultural products from roof top greenhouses in Mediterranean urban areas: Life cycle assessment of the logistics of agricultural products’, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(1), pp. 100–109, doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5736.
• Sanyé-Mengual, E. et al. (2015), ‘Integrating Horticulture into Cities: A Guide for Assessing the Implementation Potential of Rooftop Greenhouses (RTGs) in Industrial and Logistics Parks’, Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), pp. 87–111, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.942095.
• Specht, K. et al. (2014) ‘Urban agriculture of the future: an overview of sustainability aspects of food production in and on buildings’, Agriculture and Human Values, 31(1), pp. 33–51, doi: 10.1007/s10460-013-9448-4.
• Specht, K., Siebert, R., Thomaier, S. (2015), ‘Perception and acceptance of agricultural production in and on urban buildings (ZFarming): a qualitative study from Berlin, Germany’, Agriculture and Human Values, 33(4), pp. 753–769, doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9658-z.
• TEEB (2011), Ekonomia ekosystemów i bioróżnorodności w polityce lokalnej i regionalnej. Poradnik TEEB dla miast: usługi ekosystemów w gospodarce miejskiej, Kraków: Fundacja Sendzimira.
• ThinkNature | Platform for Nature-Based Solutions (no date) ThinkNature, [online:] https://www.think-nature.eu/(accessed: 24.02.2018).
• UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017), World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, New York, [online:] https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html.
• U.S. Department of Agriculture (2013), Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation, 1935, Washington, DC.: USDA, [online:] https://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/effects_2012/CC%20 and%20Agriculture%20Report%20(02-04-2013)b.pdf (accessed: 5.02.2018).
• Voicu, I., Been, V. (2008), ‘The Effect of Community Gardens on Neighboring Property Values’, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1127945, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, [online:] https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1127945 (accessed: 11.02.2018).