Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The World Environmental Forum, taking into account the global nature of most of the environmental problems of humanity, suggests using the term "global environmental safety" in international research. First of all, this is due to the strengthening of the economic and political split. Therefore, humanity, more than ever before, needs world leaders and major companies to take steps to address threats to climate, ecology, health and technological systems together, as part of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. If cooperation is avoided, the world expects a further split and a slowdown in economic growth. Geopolitical turbulence makes international relations more unstable and leads to increased competition between the largest powers, while world leaders must focus on working together to combat common risks. For more information about the specifics, principles and directions of implementing such cooperation in the framework of achieving global environmental safety, see the following sections of the work. Scientists defines the features of environmental security that prove its cross-border nature, among them: diversity, interrelation of all elements of national security, compliance with environmental rights of all population groups, etc. Here it is worth adding that, given the cross-border nature of most environmental threats, environmental security as a category of "component of national security" should be considered in the plane of international relations. World leaders and the development of the international economy now put environmental issues at the head of a multi-faceted world policy. So, in 1957, when the EU was founded, there was no environmental policy, environmental bureaucracy and laws on nature protection. Today, the EU has one of the most progressive environmental policies in the world. The network of its environmental legislation covers all industries: Air Pollution Control, Water Environment, Waste Management, nature protection and chemical control, biotechnology and other industrial risks. The body of EU environmental law consists of more than 500 directives, regulations and decisions. It can be argued that environmental policy has thus become one of the main areas of European policy.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
254--260
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997, Russia
autor
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997, Russia
Bibliografia
- 1. Agamuthu, P, Barasarathi, J. 2020. Clinical waste management under COVID-19 scenario in Malaysia. Waste Management & Research 29: 442–450.
- 2. Ali, M, Wang, W, Chaudhry, N, et al. 2017. Hospital waste management in developing countries: A mini review. Waste Management & Research 35: 581–592.
- 3. Cheval, S, Adamescu, CM, Georgiadis, T, et al. 2020. Observed and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 17: 4140.
- 4. Eroglu, H. 2020. Effects of Covid-19 outbreak on environment and renewable energy sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Epub ahead of print 28 June 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00837-4.
- 5. Fan, YV, Jiang, P, Hemzal, M, et al. 2021. An update of COVID-19 influence on waste management. Science of the Total Environment 754: 142014.
- 6. Khan, BA, Cheng, LS, Khan, AA, et al. 2019. Healthcare waste management in Asian developing countries: A mini review. Waste Management & Research 37: 63–875.
- 7. Kulkarni, BN, Aantharama, V. 2020. Repercussions of COVID-19 pandemic on municipal solid waste management: Challenges and opportunities. Science of the Total Environment 743: 140693.
- 8. Makan, A, Fadili, A. 2021. Sustainability assessment of healthcare waste treatment systems using surrogate weights and PROMETHEE method. Waste Management & Research 39: 73–82.
- 9. Peng, J, Wu, XL, Wang, RL, et al. 2020. Medical waste management practice during the 2019-2020 novel coronavirus pandemic: Experience in a general hospital. American Journal of Infection Control 48: 918–921
- 10. Rhee, SW. 2020. Management of used personal protective equipment and wastes related to COVID-19 in South Korea. Waste Management & Research 38: 820–824.
- 11. Sarkodie, SA, Owusu, PA. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on waste management. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Epub ahead of print 26 August 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00956-y.
- 12. Silva, ALP, Prata, JC, Walker, TR, et al. 2021. Increased plastic pollution due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and recommendations. Chemical Engineering Journal 405: 126683.
- 13. Tesfahun, E, Kumie, A, Beyene, A. 2016. Developing models for the prediction of hospital healthcare waste generation rate. Waste Management & Research 34: 75–80.
- 14. Yang, L, Yu, X, Wu, X, et al. 2021. Emergency response to the explosive growth of health care wastes during COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 164: 105074.
- 15. Zambrano-Monserrate, MA, Ruano, MA, SanchezAlcalde, L. 2020. Indirect effect of COVID-19 on the environment. Science of the Total Environment 728: 138813.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-24ab1b15-91e8-4e76-98bf-4d8920dc3975