The impact of procurement method of the transport services to the financial requirement of performance contracting entity

• Autorzy: Poliak M. , Krizanova A. , Semanova S. , Stefanikova S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ metody zamówień usług transportowych na wymagania finansowe umowy o wydajności podmiotu

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper deals with the issue of the impact of procurement method of the transport services to the financial requirement of performance contracting entity. In the first part, it describes the current state of transport services financing in the Slovak Republic and risk analysis, which is related to transport services procurement and conclusion of the service contract in the transport services ensuring. The rest of the paper defines the impact of procurement method of the transport services to the financial requirement of performance contracting entity.

PL

Artykuł ten mierzy się z problemem wpływu metody zamówień usług transportowych na wymagania finansowe umowy o wydajności podmiotu. W pierwszej części, opisany został obecny stan usług transportowych finansowanych na Słowacji i analizy ryzyka, które jest powiązane z zamówieniami usług transportowych i wnioski z umowy o świadczeniu usług w ubezpieczeniu usług transportowych. Reszta artykułu definiuje wpływ metody zamówień usług transportowych na wymagania finansowe umowy o wydajności podmiotu.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

contract; transport; service; risk; responsibility

PL

kontrakt; transport; serwis; odpowiedzialność

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: T. 8, z. 4
• Strony: 67--76
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Poliak M.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operations and Economics of Transport and Communications Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

autor

Krizanova A.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operations and Economics of Transport and Communications Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

autor

Semanova S.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operations and Economics of Transport and Communications Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

autor

Stefanikova S.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operations and Economics of Transport and Communications Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• 1. Automobilization was in the Slovak republic in 2012 at 337.17 cars per 1,000 inhabitants, the EU average is 473 cars per 1,000 inhabitants. (Faith, 2013).
• 2. Public authority with the meaning of territorial unit. Slovak Republic is divided into 8 territorial units: Bratislava, Trnava, Trenčín, Nitra, Banska Bystrica, Žilina, Prešov and Košice.
• 3. E.g. Contract for urban bus transport in Bardejov - reasonable profit is equal to 5% during the contract (contract expires on 31th December 2018).
• 4. Ordinance no. 296/2010 on procedures for the preparation of the financial model and determination of the maximum amount of compensation.
• 5. Athias, L., & Saussier, S. Contractual design of toll adjustment processes in infrastructure concession contracts. Revue Economigue. 2007. Vol. 58. No. 3. P. 565-576.
• 6. Beck, A. Barriers to Entry in Rail Passenger Services: Empirical Evidence for Tendering Procedures in Germany. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2011. Vol. 11. No.1. P. 20-41.
• 7. Beck, A. & Walter, M. Tender Price in Local Bus Transport in Germany – An Application of Alternative Regression Techniques. Working Paper Series in Economics. 2010. No. 13. Karlsruhe: Karlsruher Institut fȕr Technologie. Available at: http://econpapers.wiwi.kit.edu/ downloads/KITe_WP_13.pdf .
• 8. Bray, D. & Wallis, I. Adelaide bus service refrom: Impacts, achievements and lessons. Research in Transportation Economics. 2008. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 126-136.
• 9. Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. Demand for Public Transport in Germany and the USA: An Analysis of Rider Characteristics. Transport Review. 2012. Vol. 32. No. 5. P. 541-567.
• 10. Decree of the railway regulatory authority No 654/2005 setting the extent of price regulation for rail transport and price quotations of autonomous regions setting maximum prices for national regular urban bus service if the distance from the initial stop to the final stop does not exceed 100 km. 2005.
• 11. EU energy and transport in figures – statistical pocketbook 2007/2008. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 2008.
• 12. European Road Statistics. Brussels: European Union Road Federation. 2008.
• 13. Fendeková, E. & Fendek, M. Modely cenovej regulácie sieťových odvetví. Ekonomický časopis. 2010. Vol. 58. No. 10. P. 1039-1054. [In Slovak: Models of price regulation of network industries. Journal of Economics. 2010. Vol. 58. No. 10. P. 1039-1054].
• 14. Gnap, J. & Konečný, V. & Poliak, M. Elasticita dopytu v hromadnej osobnej doprave. Ekonomický časopis. 2006. No. 7. P. 668-684. [In Slovak: Gnap, J. & Konečný, V. & Poliak, M. Demand elasticity of public transport. Journal of Economics. 2006. No. 7. P. 668-684].
• 15. Hensher, D.A. & Stanley, J. Performance-based quality contracts in bus service provision. Transportation Research Part A. 2003. Vol. 37. No. 6. P. 519-538.
• 16. Hensher, D.A. & Wallis, I.P. Competitive Tendering as a Contracting Mechanism for Subsidising Transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 2005. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 295-321.
• 17. Statements about performance and revenues in the regular bus transport. Internal materials of Ministry of Transportation, construction and regional development of the Slovak Republic. 2000-2006.
• 18. Kabashkin, I. The new European transport research activities. Transport. 2004. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 191-194.
• 19. Kilianová, K. Pôsobenie činiteľov na vybrané nákladové položky prímestskej autobusovej dopravy a ich štatistická závislosť. Doprava a spoje. 2012. No. 1. P. 213-218. [In Slovak: Kilianová, K. Effect of factors on the selected cost items of suburban bus transport and their statistical significance. 2012. No. 1. P. 213-218].
• 20. Konečný, V. The procedure for measurement and evaluation of quality of public transport services. Doprava a spoje. 2011. No. 2. P. 50-59.
• 21. Lalive, R. & Schmutzler, A. Entry in Liberalized Railway Markets: The German Experience. Review of Network Economics. 2008. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 37-52.
• 22. Lalive, R. & Schmutler, A. Exploring the effects of competition for railway markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2008. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 443-458.
• 23. Ordinance no. 296/2010 on procedures for the preparation of the financial model and determination of the maximum amount of compensation. 2010.
• 24. Palúch, S. Minimalization of bus stop number on a bus station. Transport problems. 2013. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 113-119.
• 25. Poliak, M. Vzťah primeraného zisku a rizika v hromadnej osobnej doprave na Slovensku. Ekonomický časopis. 2013. Vol. 2, P. 206-220. [In Slovak: Poliak, M. The Ralationship with reasonable profit and risk in public passenger transport in Slovakia. Journal of Economics. 2013. Vol. 2, P. 206-220].
• 26. Poliak, M. & Forrest, L. & Semanová, Š. Experiences with application of public procurement in bus transport in the United Kingdom. Doprava a spoje. 2012. No. 2. P. 354-359.
• 27. Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70.
• 28. Sharma, H.K. & Swami, B.L. Emission and energy consumption characteristics of interrupted over-saturated flow for urban roads with heterogeneous traffic. Transport problems. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 29-40.
• 29. Stanley, J. & van de Velde, D. Risk and reward in public transport contracting. Research in Transport Economics. 2008. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 20-25.
• 30. Stathopoulos, A. & Marcucci, E. Special Issue on Measuring Service Quality and Local Public Transport Performance. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2014. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1-4.
• 31. van de Velde, D. A new regulation for the European public transport. Research in Transport Economics. 2008. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 78-84.
• 32. van de Velde, D. & Beck, A. & van Elburg, J. & Terschuren, K. Contracting in urban public transport. Amsterdam: European Commission. 2008. 123 p.
• 33. van de Velde, D. & Veeneman, W. & Schipholt, L.L. Competitive tendering in the Netherlands: Central planning vs. functional specifications. Transportation research part A. 2008. Vol. 42. No. 9. P. 1152-1162.
• 34. Wallis, I. & Bray, D. Competitive tendering for bus service: the improved Adelaide model. 7th conference on competition and ownership on land passenger transport. Molde. 2001.
• 35. Wallis, I. & Bray, D. & Webster, H. To competitively tender or to negotiate: Veighing up the choices in a mature market. Research in Transport Economics. 2010. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 89-98.
• 36. Zhanbirov, Z. & Kenzhegulova, S. Road factors to align the economic conditions. Transport Problems. 2013. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 79-83.