Global gridded products efficiency in closing water balance models: various modeling scenarios for behavioral assessments

Mousavi, Rahimeh; Nasseri, Mohsen; Abbasi, Saeed; Taheri, Mercedeh; Anboohi, Milad Shamsi

doi:10.1007/s11600-022-01004-1

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Global gridded products efficiency in closing water balance models: various modeling scenarios for behavioral assessments

Autorzy

Mousavi Rahimeh , Nasseri Mohsen , Abbasi Saeed , Taheri Mercedeh , Anboohi Milad Shamsi

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-022-01004-1

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Global gridded products efficiency in closing water balance models: various modeling scenarios for behavioral assessments

Słowa kluczowe

water balance remote sensing global gridded products GLUE evapotranspiration precipitation

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 71, no. 5

Strony

2401--2422

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 83 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mousavi Rahimeh

mousavi@znu.ac.ir

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-5400

autor

Nasseri Mohsen

mnasseri@ut.ac.ir

School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-7631

autor

Abbasi Saeed

abbasi.saeed@znu.ac.ir

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1847-2105

autor

Taheri Mercedeh

mrc.tahery@ut.ac.ir

School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N6N5, Canada

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7596-1963

autor

Anboohi Milad Shamsi

manboohi@ut.ac.ir

School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8413-0707

Bibliografia

1. Abatzoglou J and National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff (Eds). Last modified 25 Jan 2021. "The Climate Data Guide: TerraClimate: Global, high-resolution gridded temperature, precipitation, and other water balance variables." Retrieved from https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/terraclimate-global-high-resolution-gridded-temperature-precipitation-and-other-water
2. Adane GB, Hirpa BA, Gebru BM, Song C, Lee W-K (2021) Integrating satellite rainfall estimates with hydrological water balance model: rainfall-runoff modeling in Awash River Basin. Ethiopia Water 13:800
3. Ahmadi A, Nasseri M (2020) Do direct and inverse uncertainty assessment methods present the same results? J Hydroinf 22:842–855
4. Allen RG, Tasumi M, Trezza R (2007) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)—Model. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(4):380–394
5. Amini Y, Nasseri M (2021) Improving spatial estimation of hydrologic attributes via optimized moving search strategies. Arab J Geosci 14:723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06961-3
6. Bastiaanssen WG, Menenti M, Feddes RA, Holtslag AAM (1998) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formul J Hydrol 212:198–212
7. Becker R, Koppa A, Schulz S, Usman M, Aus Der Beek T, Schuth C (2019) Spatially distributed model calibration of a highly managed hydrological system using remote sensing-derived ET data. J Hydrol 577:123944
8. Behrangi A, Khakbaz B, Jaw TC, Aghakouchak A, Hsu K, Sorooshian S (2011) Hydrologic evaluation of satellite precipitation products over a mid-size basin. J Hydrol 39:225–237
9. Beven K (2016) Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication. Hydrol Sci J 61(9):1652–1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761
10. Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298
11. Che T, Li X, Gao F (2004) Estimation of snow water equivalent in the Tibetan Plateau using passive microwave remote sensing data (SSM/I). J Glaciol Geocryol 3:19–368
12. Chen M, Senay GB, Singh RK, Verdin JP (2016) Uncertainty analysis of the operational simplified surface energy balance (SSEBop) model at multiple flux tower sites. J Hydrol 536:384–399
13. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) (2017): ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate . Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS), date of access. https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home
14. Dembélé M, Zwart SJ (2016) Evaluation and comparison of satellite-based rainfall products in burkina faso, West Africa. Int J Remote Sens 37:3995–4014. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1207258
15. Dembele M, Ceperley N, Zwart SJ, Salvadore E, Mariethoz G, Schaefli B (2020) Potential of satellite and reanalysis evaporation datasets for hydrological modelling under various model calibration strategies. Adv Water Resour 143:103667
16. Dorigo W, Gruber A, de Jeu R, Wagner W, Stacke T, Loew A, Albergel C, Brocca L, Chung D, Parinussa R (2015) Evaluation of the ESA CCI soil moisture product using ground-based observations. Remote Sens Environ 162:380–395
17. Duan Z, Tuo Y, Liu J, Gao H, Song X, Zhang Z, Yang L, Mekonnen DF (2019) Hydrological evaluation of open-access precipitation and air temperature datasets using SWAT in a poorly gauged basin in Ethiopia. J Hydrol 569:612–626
18. Eini MR, Javadi J, Delavar M, Gassman PW, Jarihani B (2020) Development of alternative SWAT-based models for simulating water budget components and streamflow for a karstic-influenced watershed. CATENA 195:104801
19. Funk CC, Peterson PJ, Landsfeld MF, Pedreros DH, Verdin JP, Rowland JD, Romero BE, Husak GJ, Michaelsen JC, Verdin AP (2014) A quasi-global precipitation time series for drought monitoring: U.S.Geological Survey Data Series 832, 4 p.ftp://chg-ftpout.geog.ucsb.edu/pub/org/chg/products/CHIRPS-2.0/docs/USGS-DS832.CHIRPS.pdf
20. Gao H, Tang Q, Ferguson CR, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Estimating the water budget of major US river basins via remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 31:3955–3978
21. Guo S, Chen H, Zhang H, Xiong L, Liu P, Pang B, Wang G, Wang Y (2005) A semi-distributed monthly water balance model and its application in a climate change impact study in the middle and lower Yellow River basin. Water Int 30:250–260
22. Ha LT, Bastiaanssen WG, van Griensven A, van Dijk AI, Senay GB (2018) Calibration of spatially distributed hydrological processes and model parameters in SWAT using remote sensing data and an auto-calibration procedure: a case study in a Vietnamese river basin. Water 10:212
23. Herman MR, Nejadhashemi AP, Abouali M, Hernandez-Suarez JS, Daneshvar F, Zhang Z, Anderson MC, Sadeghi AM, Hain CR, Sharifi A (2018) Evaluating the role of evapotranspiration remote sensing data in improving hydrological modeling predictability. J Hydrol 556:39–49
24. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ, Wolff DB, Adler RF, Gu G, Hong Y, Bowman KP, Stocker EF (2007) The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol 8:38–55
25. Immerzeel W, Droogers P (2008) Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 349:411–424
26. Jazim AA (2006) A monthly six-parameter water balance model and its application at arid and semiarid low yielding catchments. J King Saud Univ-Eng Sci 19:65–81
27. Jiang L, Islam S (2001) Estimation of surface evaporation map over southern Great Plains using remote sensing data. Water Resour Res 37:329–340
28. Jiang L, Wu H, Tao J, Kimball JS, Alfieri L, Chen X (2020) Satellite-based evapotranspiration in hydrological model calibration. Remote Sens 12:428
29. Jin X, Xu C-Y, Zhang Q, Singh V (2010) Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. J Hydrol 383:147–155
30. Khan MS, Liaqat UW, Baik J, Choi M (2018) Stand-alone uncertainty characterization of GLEAM, GLDAS and MOD16 evapotranspiration products using an extended triple collocation approach. Agric For Meteorol 252:256–268
31. Knoben WJ, Freer JE, Woods RA (2019) Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash-Sutcliffe and Kling-Gupta efficiency scores. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23:4323–4331
32. Kouchi DH, Esmaili K, Faridhosseini A, Sanaeinejad SH, Khalili D, Abbaspour KC (2017) Sensitivity of calibrated parameters and water sresource estimates on different objective functions and optimization algorithms. Water 9:384
33. Kunnath-Poovakka A, Ryu D, Renzullo L, George B (2016) The efficacy of calibrating hydrologic model using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and soil moisture for streamflow prediction. J Hydrol 535:509–524
34. Lancaster P, Salkauskas K (1981) Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math Comput 37:141–158
35. Lauri H, Räsänen T, Kummu M (2014) Using reanalysis and remotely sensed temperature and precipitation data for hydrological modeling in monsoon climate: Mekong River case study. J Hydrometeorol 15:1532–1545
36. le Coz C, van de Giesen N (2020) Comparison of rainfall products over sub-saharan africa. J Hydrometeorol 21:553–596
37. Li L, Xia J, Xu C-Y, Singh V (2010) Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models. J Hydrol 390:210–221
38. Liu W, Wang L, Zhou J, Li Y, Sun F, Fu G, Li X, Sang Y-F (2016) A worldwide evaluation of basin-scale evapotranspiration estimates against the water balance method. J Hydrol 538:82–95
39. Long D, Longuevergne L, Scanlon BR (2014) Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites. Water Resour Res 50:1131–1151
40. Lopez PL, Sutanudjaja EH, Schellekens J, Sterk G, Bierkens MF (2017) Calibration of a large-scale hydrological model using satellite-based soil moisture and evapotranspiration products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:3125–3144
41. Mackay JD, Jackson CR, Wang L (2014) A lumped conceptual model to simulate groundwater level time-series. Environ Model Softw 61:229–245
42. Martens B, Miralles DG, Lievens H, van der Schalie R, de Jeu RAM, Fernández-Prieto D, Beck HE, Dorigo WA, Verhoest NEC (2017) GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geosci Model Dev 10:1903–1925. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017
43. Moreira AA, Ruhoff AL, Roberti DR, de Arruda Souza V, da Rocha HR, de Paiva RCD (2019) Assessment of terrestrial water balance using remote sensing data in South America. J Hydrol 575:131–147
44. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900
45. Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE 58:1763–1785
46. Moshir Panahi D, Sadeghi Tabas S, Kalantari Z, Ferreira CSS, Zahabiyoun B (2021) Spatio-temporal assessment of global gridded evapotranspiration datasets across Iran. Remote Sens 13(9):1816
47. Muñoz Sabater J (2019) ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb3
48. Muthuwatta LP, Booij MJ, Rientjes TH, Bos M, Gieske A, Ahmad M-U-D (2009) Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using discharge and remote sensing data. IAHS Publ 333:52
49. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290
50. Nasseri M, Ansari A, Zahraie B (2014) Uncertainty assessment of hydrological models with fuzzy extension principle: evaluation of a new arithmetic operator. Water Resour Res 50:1095–1111
51. Nasseri M, Schoups G, Taheri M (2022) A spatiotemporal framework to calibrate high-resolution global monthly precipitation products: an application to the Urmia Lake Watershed in Iran. Int J Climatol 42(4):2169–2194
52. Odusanya AE, Mehdi B, Schurz C, Oke AO, Awokola OS, Awomeso JA, Adejuwon JO, Schulz K (2019) Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data-sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23
53. Odusanya AE, Schulz K, Biao EI, Degan BA, Mehdi-Schulz B (2021) Evaluating the performance of streamflow simulated by an eco-hydrological model calibrated and validated with global land surface actual evapotranspiration from remote sensing at a catchment scale in West Africa. J Hydrol Reg Stud 37:100893
54. Pan S, Liu L, Bai Z, Xu Y-P (2018) Integration of remote sensing evapotranspiration into multi-objective calibration of distributed hydrology–soil–vegetation model (DHSVM) in a Humid Region of China. Water 10:1841
55. Parajka J, Blöschl G (2008) The value of MODIS snow cover data in validating and calibrating conceptual hydrologic models. J Hydrol 358:240–258
56. Pomeon T, Diekkruger B, Springer A, Kusche J, Eicker A (2018) Multi-objective validation of SWAT for sparsely-gauged West African River Basins—A remote sensing approach. Water 10:451
57. Qin C, Jia Y, Su Z, Zhou Z, Qiu Y, Suhui S (2008) Integrating remote sensing information into a distributed hydrological model for improving water budget predictions in large-scale basins through data assimilation. Sensors 8:4441–4465
58. Rabuffetti D, Ravazzani G, Corbari C, Mancini M (2008) Verification of operational Quantitative Discharge Forecast (QDF) for a regional warning system? the AMPHORE case studies in the upper Po River
59. Rajib A, Evenson GR, Golden HE, Lane CR (2018) Hydrologic model predictability improves with spatially explicit calibration using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and biophysical parameters. J Hydrol 567:668–683
60. Rientjes T, Muthuwatta LP, Bos M, Booij MJ, Bhatti H (2013) Multi-variable calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using streamflow data and satellite-based evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 505:276–290
61. Rossetto R, de Filippis G, Triana F, Ghetta M, Borsi I, Schmid W (2019) Software tools for management of conjunctive use of surface- and ground-water in the rural environment: integration of the Farm Process and the Crop Growth Module in the FREEWAT platform. Agric Water Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105717
62. Roy T, Gupta HV, Serrat-Capdevila A, Valdes JB (2017) Using satellite-based evapotranspiration estimates to improve the structure of a simple conceptual rainfall–runoff model
63. Running S, Mu Q, Zhao M (2017) MOD16A2 MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. Accessed 2021-09-21 from https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD16A2.006
64. Rusli S, Weerts A, Taufiq A, Bense V (2021) Estimating water balance components and their uncertainty bounds in highly groundwater-dependent and data-scarce area: an example for the Upper Citarum basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud 37:100911
65. Satge F, Defrance D, Sultan B, Bonnet M-P, Seyler F, Rouche N, Pierron F, Paturel J-E (2020) Evaluation of 23 gridded precipitation datasets across West Africa. J Hydrol 581:124412
66. Senay GB, Kagone S, Velpuri NM (2020) Operational Global Actual Evapotranspiration using the SSEBop model: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OUVUUI
67. Seyyedi H, Anagnostou EN, Beighley E, McCollum J (2015) Hydrologic evaluation of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over a mid-latitude basin. Atmos Res 164:37–48
68. Shahrban M (2017) On the Importance of Soil Moisture for Streamflow Forecasting. Monash University
69. Shawul AA, Chakma S (2020) Suitability of global precipitation estimates for hydrologic prediction in the main watersheds of Upper Awash basin. Environ Earth Sci 79:1–18
70. Shayeghi A, Azizian A, Brocca L (2020) Reliability of reanalysis and remotely sensed precipitation products for hydrological simulation over the Sefidrood River Basin. Iran Hydrol Sci J 65:296–310
71. Taheri M, Dolatabadi N, Nasseri M, Zahraie B, Amini Y, Schoups G (2020) Localized linear regression methods for estimating monthly precipitation grids using elevation, rain gauge and TRMM data. Theoret Appl Climatol 142:623–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03320-2
72. Taheri M, Anboohi MS, Mousavi R, Nasseri M (2022a) Hybrid global gridded snow products and conceptual simulations of distributed snow budget: evaluation of different scenarios in a mountainous watershed. Front Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1005-2
73. Taheri M, Anboohi MS, Nasseri M, Bigdeli M, Mohammadian A (2022) Quantifying a reliable framework to estimate hydro-climatic conditions via a three-way interaction between land surface temperature, evapotranspiration, soil moisture. Atmosphere 13(11):1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111916
74. Tobin KJ, Bennett ME (2014) Satellite precipitation products and hydrologic applications. Water Int 39:360–380
75. Tobin KJ, Bennett ME (2017) Constraining SWAT calibration with remotely sensed evapotranspiration data. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 53:593–604
76. Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) (2011) TRMM (TMPA/3B43) Rainfall Estimate L3 1 month 0.25 degree x 0.25 degree V7, Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC). https://doi.org/10.5067/TRMM/TMPA/MONTH/7
77. Troy TJ, Wood EF, Sheffield J (2008) An efficient calibration method for continental‐scale land surface modeling. Water Resour Res 44
78. Velpuri N, Senay G, Asante K (2012) A multi-source satellite data approach for modelling Lake Turkana water level: calibration and validation using satellite altimetry data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1
79. Vervoort RW, Miechels SF, van Ogtrop FF, Guillaume JH (2014) Remotely sensed evapotranspiration to calibrate a lumped conceptual model: Pitfalls and opportunities. J Hydrol 519:3223–3236
80. Wang Q, Pagano T, Zhou S, Hapuarachchi H, Zhang L, Robertson D (2011) Monthly versus daily water balance models in simulating monthly runoff. J Hydrol 404:166–175
81. Wang G, Zhang J, Jin J, Liu Y, He R, Bao Z, Liu C, Li Y (2014) Regional calibration of a water balance model for estimating stream flow in ungauged areas of the Yellow River Basin. Quat Int 336:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.051
82. Winsemius H, Savenije H, Bastiaanssen W (2008) Constraining model parameters on remotely sensed evaporation: justification for distribution in ungauged basins? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12
83. Zhang Y, Chiew FH, Zhang L, Li H (2009) Use of remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration to improve rainfall–runoff modeling in Southeast Australia. J Hydrometeorol 10:969–980

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-244c5e4e-ec87-440c-b173-7856e9bcad97