Risk assessment for rail freight transport operations

• Autorzy: Szaciłło Lucyna , Jacyna Marianna , Szczepański Emilian , Izdebski Mariusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17531/ein.2021.3.8

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this article is to assess the risk of performance of rail freight transport on the basis of an analysis of identified risk areas based on statistical data on the causes of accidents that occurred on the lines of railway transport in Poland. A critical review of selected scientific studies relating to the risk assessment process for identified areas of the railway system has been undertaken. Based on statistical data, the authors analysed the causes of accidents on railway lines in 2019 in Poland and determined the probability of occurrence of a given cause. In addition, the article calculates the probability of vehicle delays for different emergency situations occurring in the performance of rail freight transport operations. This enabled the authors of the article to carry out a risk assessment of freight train delays on railway lines.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk assessment; railway transport risk; train delay risk level; causes of railway accidents

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, no. 3
• Strony: 476--488
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 57 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Szaciłło Lucyna

• Warsaw University of Technology Faculty of Transport, ul. Koszykowa 75, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Jacyna Marianna

• Warsaw University of Technology Faculty of Transport, ul. Koszykowa 75, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Szczepański Emilian

• Warsaw University of Technology Faculty of Transport, ul. Koszykowa 75, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Izdebski Mariusz

• Warsaw University of Technology Faculty of Transport, ul. Koszykowa 75, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Abioye OF, Dulebenets MA, Pasha J, et al. Accident and hazard prediction models for highway-rail grade crossings: a state-of-the-practice review for the USA. Railway engineering science 2020; 28(3): 251-274, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-020-00215-w.
• 2. Adey T, Hackl J, Lam JC, et al. Ensuring acceptable levels of infrastructure related risks due to natural hazards with emphasis on conducting stress tests. 1st International Symposium on Infrastructure Asset Management (SIAM), Kyoto, Japan,, January 21-22, 2016; 1-18, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000114177.
• 3. Berrado A, El-Koursi E, Cherkaoui A, Khaddour M. A Framework for Risk Management in Railway Sector: Application to Road-Rail. Open Transportation Journal 2011; 5: 34-44, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801105010034.
• 4. Borucka A, Wiśniowski P, Mazurkiewicz D, Świderski A. Laboratory measurements of vehicle exhaust emissions in conditions reproducing real traffic. Measurement 2021; 174: 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.108998.
• 5. Burdzik R, Nowak B, Rozmus J, Słowiński P, Pankiewicz J. Safety in the railway industry. Archives of Transport 2017; 44(4): 15-24, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.6158.
• 6. Cafiso S, Di Graziano A, Di Blasi N. Risk assessment on railway transportation of hazardous materials. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2006; 91: 97-106, https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK060101.
• 7. Ciszewski T, Nowakowski W, Chrzan M. Analysis of selected aspects of the railway safety in the European Union. AUTOBUSY - Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe 2018; 19(12): 378-381, https://doi.org/10.24136/atest.2018.416.
• 8. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009, http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2013/402/oj.
• 9. Daniewski K, Kosicka E, Mazurkiewicz D. Analysis of the correctness of determination of the effectiveness of maintenance service actions. Management and Production Engineering Review 2018; 9(2): 20-25, https://doi.org/10.24425/119522.
• 10. Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/797/oj.
• 11. Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/798/oj.
• 12. Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2012/34/oj.
• 13. Fourie CJ, Zhuwaki NT. A modelling framework for railway infrastructure reliability analysis. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 2017; 28(4): 150-160, http://dx.doi.org/10.7166/28-4-1763.
• 14. Gołębiowski P, Kukulski J. Preliminary study of shaping the railway track geometry in terms of their maintenance costs and capacity. Archives of Transport 2020; 53(1): 115-128, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1787.
• 15. Grenčík J, Galliková J, Volna P, Poprocký R. Use of risk assessment methods in maintenance for more reliable rolling stock operation. MATEC Web of Conferences 2018; 157, 04002: 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815704002.
• 16. Grenčík J, Volna P, Galliková J. A novel methodology of risk assessment. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin 2020;63(135): 17-22, https://doi.org/10.17402/435.
• 17. Hackl J, Lam JC, Adey B, Heitzler M. Novel indicators for identifying critical, INFRAstructure at RISK from Natural Hazards. D4.2 Final Model, Methodology and Information Exchange. ETH Zurich, 2016.
• 18. Huanga W, Zhanga Y, Koue X, el al. Railway dangerous goods transportation system risk analysis: An Interpretive Structural Modeling and Bayesian Network combining approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2020; 204, 107220: 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107220.
• 19. Huanga W, Zhanga Y, Yua Y, et al. Historical data-driven risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Comparisons between Entropy Weight Method and Scatter Degree Method. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2021; 205,107236: 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107236 .
• 20. Instrukcja postępowania w sprawach poważnych wypadków, wypadków i incydentów w transporcie kolejowym Ir-8. Warszawa: PKP PLK S.A., 2016.
• 21. ISO 31000:2018. Risk Management. Guidelines.
• 22. ISO Guide 73:2009 Risk management - Vocabulary.
• 23. ISO/IEC 31010:2009 Risk management - Risk assessment techniques.
• 24. Jacyna M, Gołębiowski P, Krześniak, M. Some aspects of heuristic algorithms and their application in decision support tools for freight railway traffic organisation. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport 2017; 96: 59-69, https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2017.96.6.
• 25. Jacyna M, Szczepański E, Izdebski M, et al. Characteristics of event recorders in Automatic Train Control systems. Archives of Transport 2018, 46(2): 61-70, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.2103.
• 26. Jacyna M, Gołębiowski P, Urbaniak M. Multi-option model of railway traffic organisation including the energy recuperation. In: Mikulski J. (eds) Challenge of Transport Telematics. TST 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science 2016; 640: 199-210, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49646-7_17.
• 27. Jacyna M, Krześniak M. Computer Support of Decision-Making for the Planning Movement of Freight Wagons on the Rail Network. In: Macioszek E, Sierpiński G. (eds) Recent Advances in Traffic Engineering for Transport Networks and Systems. TSTP 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2018; 21: 225-236, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64084-6_21.
• 28. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M, Antosz K, Wyczółkowski R, el al. Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing. Energies 2021; 14(5): 1-30, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051436.
• 29. Kang R, Wang J, Cheng J, et al. (2019). Intelligent Forecasting of Automatic Train Protection System Failure Rate in China High-speed Railway. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2019; 21(4): 567-576, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.4.5.
• 30. Komisja Badania Wypadków Kolejowych, https://www.gov.pl/web/mswia/raporty (accessed 19.04.2021).
• 31. Konowrocki R, Chojnacki A. Analysis of rail vehicles' operational reliability in the aspect of safety against derailment based on various methods of determining the assessment criterion. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2020; 22(1): 73-85, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2020.1.9.
• 32. Kowalski M, Izdebski M, Żak J, Gołda P, Manerowski J. Planning and management of aircraft maintenance using a genetic algorithm. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2021, 23(1): 143-153, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.1.15.
• 33. Kukulski J, Jacyna M, Gołębiowski P. Finite Element Method in Assessing Strength Properties of a Railway Surface and Its Elements. Symmetry-Basel 2019; 8(11): 1-29. http://doi.org/10.3390/sym11081014.
• 34. Leitner B. A General Model for Railway Systems Risk Assessment with the Use of Railway Accident Scenarios Analysis. Procedia Engineering 2017; 187: 150-159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.361.
• 35. Leśniak A, Janowiec F. Risk Assessment of Additional Works in Railway Construction Investments Using the Bayes Network. Sustainability 2019; 11(19): 1-15, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195388.
• 36. Lin JT, Xu Q. Functional safety verification of train control procedure in train-centric CBTC by colored petri net. Archives of Transport 2020; 54(2): 43-58, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.2730.
• 37. Liu X. Development of a Risk Assessment Tool for Rail Transport of Flammable Energy Resources. Final report (CAIT-UTC-NC16). New Jersey: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 2016.
• 38. Niu HX, Hou T. Fast detection study of foreign object intrusion on railway track. Archives of Transport 2018; 47(3): 79-89, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.6510.
• 39. Papathanasiou N, Adey B, Burkhalter M, Martani C. D3.6 Risk Assessment Methodology. DESTination RAIL - Decision Support Tool for Rail Infrastructure Managers. Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
• 40. Peace Ch. The reasonably practicable test and work health and safety related risk assessments. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 2017; 42(2): 61-78.
• 41. Procedura nr SMS/MMS-PR-02 Ocena ryzyka technicznego i operacyjnego, PKP PLK S.A., 2015.
• 42. Punktualność przewozów towarowych w 2019 r. https://www.utk.gov.pl/pl/raporty-i-analizy/analizy-i-monitoring/statystyka-przewozow-to/dane-archiwalne/15700,Punktualnosc-przewozow-towarowych-w-2019-r.html (accessed 19.04.2021).
• 43. Rahbar M, Bagheri M. Risk Assessment Framework for the Rail Transport of Hazardous Materials. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2015; 2411(1): 90-95, https://doi.org/10.3141/2411-11.
• 44. Raport w sprawie bezpieczeństwa w 2019. Warszawa: Urząd Transportu Kolejowego, 2020.
• 45. Restel FJ. Impact of infrastructure type on reliability of railway transportation system. Journal of KONBiN 2013; 1(25): 21-36, https://doi.org/10.2478/jok-2013-0065.
• 46. Restel FJ. The railway operation process evaluation method in terms of resilience analysis. Archives of Transport 2021; 57(1): 73-89, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.7485.
• 47. Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure and Construction of 16 March 2016 on serious accidents, accidents and incidents in railway transport (Journal of Laws of 2015, item 1297, 1741, 1753, 1777 and 1893).
• 48. Simic V, Jovcic S, Soušek R. Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure. Mathematics 2020; 8(12): 1-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math8122259.
• 49. Smoczyński P, Kadziński A. Introduction to the risk management in the maintenance of railway tracks. Journal of Mechanical and Transport Engineering 2016; 68(4): 65-80, https://doi.org/10.21008/j.2449-920X.2016.68.4.06.
• 50. Sobota A, Żochowska R, Szczepański E, Gołda P. The influence of tram tracks on car vehicle speed and noise emission at four-approach intersections located on multilane arteries in cities. Journal of Vibroengineering 2018; 20(6): 2453-2468, https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2018.20087.
• 51. Sprawozdanie z funkcjonowania rynku transportu kolejowego w 2019 r. Warszawa: Urząd Transportu Kolejowego, 2020.
• 52. Sprawozdanie ze stanu bezpieczeństwa w ruchu kolejowym w 2018 r. Warszawa: Urząd Transportu Kolejowego, 2019.
• 53. Świerczek A. Zarządzanie ryzykiem transmisji zakłóceń we współdziałaniu przedsiębiorstw w łańcuchach dostaw. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 2012.
• 54. Toruń A, Sokołowska L, Jacyna M. Communications-based train control system - Concept based on WiFi LAN network. Proceedings of 23rd International Scientific Conference. Transport Means 2019: 911-915.
• 55. Urbaniak M, Kardas-Cinal E, Jacyna M. Optimization of Energetic Train Cooperation. Symmetry-Basel 2019; 11(9): 1-19, http://doi.org/10.3390/sym11091175.
• 56. Act of 28 March 2003 on rail transport (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 710).
• 57. Yu H, Zhang G, Ran Y, Li M, Wang Y. A comprehensive and practical reliability allocation method considering failure effects and reliability costs. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2018; 20(2): 244-251, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2018.2.09

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).