The basis of financial arithmetic from the viewpoint of utility theory

• Autorzy: Piasecki K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main goal of this paper is to present a modern axiomatic approach to financial arithmetic. An axiomatic theory of financial arithmetic was first proposed by Peccati, who introduced an axiomatic definition of future value. This theory has been extensively developed in recent years. The proposed approach to financial arithmetic is based on the concept of the utility of a financial flow. This utility function is defined as a linear extension of a multicriterion comparison determined by an individual’s time preference and capital preference. The present value is then defined to be the utility of the financial flow. Therefore, the law of the diminishing marginal utility of wealth has been considered as an additional feature of the present value. The future value is defined as the inverse of the utility function. This definition is a generalization of Peccati’s one. The net present value is given as the unique additive extension of the utility of the financial flow. Moreover, the synergy effect and the diversification effect will be discussed. At the end, the axiomatic definition of the present value will be specified in three ways.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

synergy effect of capital; diversification; financial arithmetic; Gossen’s first law; utility

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Operations Research and Decisions
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 22, No. 3
• Strony: 37--53
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Piasecki K.

• Poznań University of Economics, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] BECKER G.S., DUESENBERRY J.S., OKUN B., An Economic Analysis of Fertility, [in:] G.G. Roberts (Ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960, 209–231. The basis of financial arithmetic from the viewpoint of utility theory 53
• [2] BEGG D., STANLEY FISCHER S., DORNBUSCH R., Economics, 8th Ed., McGraw-Hill (UK), London, 2005.
• [3] COOPER B., GARCIA PEÑALOZA C., FUNK P., Status effect and negative utility growth, The Economic Journal, 2001, 111, 642–665.
• [4] DACEY R., ZIELONKA P., A detailed prospect theory explanation of the disposition effect, Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2008, 9 (1), 43–50.
• [5] DOYLE J.R., Survey of time preference, delay discounting models, Working Paper, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, 2010, [online:], http://ssrn.com/abstract=1685861
• [6] EER T., FEHR-DUDA H., BRUHIN A., Uncertainty breeds decreasing impatience: The role of risk preferences in time discounting, Working Paper No. 412, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich, 2009, [online:] http://ssrn.com/abstract=1416007
• [7] FREDERICK S., LOEWENSTEIN G., O’DONOGHUE T., Time discounting and time preference: A critical review, Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40, 351–401.
• [8] HAN R., TAKAHASHI T., Psychophysics of time-perception and valuation in temporal discounting of gain and loss, Physica A, 2012, doi:10.1016/j.physa.2012.07.01.
• [9] HICKMAN J.L., A note on the concept of multiset, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 1980, 22, 211–217
• [10] JANSSEN J. MANCA R.VOLPE DI PRIGNANO E., Mathematical Finance. Deterministic and Stochastic Models, Wiley, London, 2009.
• [11] KEENEY R.L., RAIFFA H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Trade-offs, Wiley, New York, 1976.
• [12] KILLEEN P.R., An additive-utility model of delay discounting, Psychological Review, 2009, 116. 602–619.
• [13] KIM B.K., ZAUBERMAN G., Perception of anticipatory time in temporal discounting, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 2009, 2, 91–101.
• [14] KONTEK K., Decision utility theory: back to von Neumann, Morgenstern, and Markowitz, Working Paper, 2010, [online:] http://ssrn.com/abstract=1718424
• [15] MARKOWITZ H., Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7, 77–91.
• [16] MISES L.VON., The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. An Essay on Method, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, 1962.
• [17] PECCATI L., Su di una caratterizzazione del principio del criterio dell’attualizzazione, Studium Parmense, Parma, 1972.
• [18] PIASECKI K., Od arytmetyki handlowej do inżynierii finansowej, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, Poznań, 2005
• [19] PIASECKI K., Modele matematyki finansowej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 2007.
• [20] PIASECKI K., Behavioural present value, Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal, 2011, 4, [online:] http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1729351
• [21] PIASECKI K., Rozmyte zbiory probabilistyczne jako narzędzie finansowa behawioralnych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań, 2011.
• [22] PIASECKI K., Effectiveness of securities with fuzzy probabilistic return, Operations Research and Decisions, 2011, 2, 65–78.
• [23] RABIN M., Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics, The American Economic Review, 1993, 83 1281–1302.
• [24] SYROPOULOS A., Mathematics of Multisets, [in:] C.S. Calude (Ed.) Multiset Processing. Mathematical,Computer Science, and Molecular Computing Points of View, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2235, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, 347–359.
• [25] TAKAHASHI T., Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time perception, Medical Hypotheses, 2005, 65, 691–693.
• [26] ZAUBERMAN G., KYU KIM B MALKOC S., BETTMAN J.R., Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences, Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46, 543–556.