Drone swarms - as an innovative tool to carry out irregular warfare

• Autorzy: Olkiewicz Marcin , Wolniak Radosław , Terebecki Mariusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2025.215.24

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to analyze the possibilities of using drone swarms as an innovative battlefield tool. Design/methodology/approach: The research includes simulation methods by using computer simulation methods based on the so-called random walk - Brownian motion and Brownian bridge. Findings: The research shows that the innovative use of drone swarms will further increase the possibility of using them in an asymmetrical conflict. Particularly important is the cheapness of the presented solution, the possibility of using it after only a short training and the option to perform an earlier simulation of the effects of the drone swarms application by people with an average level of IT knowledge. Research limitations/implications: The study focused on analyzing the possibilities of using simulation methods to manage innovative drone swarms exclusively for military purposes and the possibilities of using such solutions. According to the authors, the research should be carried out in other areas of social life. Practical implications: In the era of Industry 4.0, which is based on digitization and robotization, it will be possible to increasingly use solutions that make use of artificial intelligence (AI) on the battlefield, such as the application of innovative drone swarms. Originality/value: The presented solution is based on innovations in various areas, it can be stated that this type of drone application is an open innovation and can be developed by both military and civilian companies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

open innovation; national security; drones; Industry 4.0; warfare; Brownian motion

PL

otwarta innowacja; bezpieczeństwo narodowe; drony; Przemysł 4.0; wojna; ruchy Browna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: z. 215
• Strony: 387--408
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr.117 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Olkiewicz Marcin

• Koszalin University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6181-6829

autor

Wolniak Radosław

• Silesian University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-9811

autor

Terebecki Mariusz

• Pomeranian Academy in Słupsk

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-2067

Bibliografia

• 1. Agwu, F.A. (2017). Armed drones and globalization in the asymmetric war on terror: Challenges for the law of armed conflict and global political economy.
• 2. Alam Khan, P., Johl, S.K., Akhtar, S., Asif, M., Salameh, A.A., Kanesan, T. (2022). Open Innovation of Institutional Investors and Higher Education System in Creating Open Approach for SDG-4 Quality Education: A Conceptual Review. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010049.
• 3. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School.
• 4. Antebi, L. (2017). Unmanned aerial vehicles in asymmetric warfare: Maintaining the advantage of the state actor. In: U. Dekel, G. Siboni, O. Einav (eds.), The Quiet Decade: In the Aftermath of the Second Lebanon War, 2006-2016 (pp. 83-94). Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies.
• 5. Aroosa, K. (2021). Dreaming with drones: Palestine under the shadow of unseen war. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 57(1), 240-258.
• 6. Baggiarini, B., Rupka, S. (2020). Remembering the drone wars: High technology warfare and the Trauma Lacuna. Social Research, 87(3), 763-786.
• 7. Bauer, V., Reese, M., Ruby, K. (2022). Does Insurgent Selective Punishment Deter Collaboration? Evidence from the Drone War in Pakistan. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(2), 297-326.
• 8. Behnke, A. (2020). Drone warfare and the emergence of spaces of exception, Law. Security and the State of Perpetual Emergency, 12, 37-65.
• 9. Benjamin, M. (2013). Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control, New York: Verso.
• 10. Bergen, P., Sims, A.G. (2021). America's drone wars outside of conventional war zones, Routledge Handbook of U.S. Counterterrorism and Irregular Warfare Operations, 460-476.
• 11. Bernstein, S., Legatiuk, D., Motion, B. (2022). Martingales and Itô Formula in Clifford Analysis. Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 32(3), 27.
• 12. Bober, B., Olkiewicz, M., Wolniak, R. (2017). Innowacje w przemyśle farmaceutycznym jako determinanta procesu kształtowania jakości życia. Przemysł Chemiczny, 11(96), pp. 2199-2201. DOI:10.15199/62.2017.11.3
• 13. Borg, S. (2021). Assembling Israeli drone warfare: Loitering surveillance and operational sustainability. Security Dialogue, 52(5), 401-417.
• 14. Borkowski, R., Łach, A., Zwierzyna, J. (2018). Wykorzystanie bezzałogowych statków powietrznych w ratownictwie wodnym. Bezpieczeństwo-teoria i praktyka, 2, 115-130; https://btip.ka.edu.pl/pdf/2018-2/btip2018-2-borkowski-2a.pdf, 21.04.2022.
• 15. Bousquet, A. (2017). A revolution in military affairs? Changing technologies and changing practices of warfare, Technology and World Politics: An Introduction. McCarthy D.R. (ed.). London: Routledge.
• 16. Boyle, M.J. (2015). The Race for Drones. Orbis, 59(1), 76-94.
• 17. Burdziakowski, P. (2011). Bezzałogowe statki powietrzne. Przegląd Morski, 7, 15-20.
• 18. Byman, D. (2013). Why drones work: The case for Washington's weapon of choice. Foreign Affairs, 92(4), 32-43.
• 19. Chart generator 3W. https://plot.ly/create/#/, 21.04.2022.
• 20. Cianciara, A. (2012). How The Strong Lose Wars: Transformative Goals And The Outcome Of Asymmetric Conflict. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 6(3-4), 122-143.
• 21. Cooke, P., Nunes, S., Olivia, S., Lazzeretti, L. (2022). Open Innovation, Soft Branding and Green Influencers: Critiquing 'Fast Fash-ion' and 'Overtourism'. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 52.
• 22. Davis, S.I. (2022). Artificial intelligence at the operational level of war. Defense and Security Analysis, 38(1), 74-90.
• 23. Delsaulx, J. (2018). Thermo-dynamic Origin of the Brownian Motions. Monthly Microscopical Journal, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365- 2818.1877.tb00093.x, 21.04.2022.
• 24. Dixit, A., Jakhar, S.K., Kumar, P. (2022). Does lean and sustainable manufacturing lead to Industry 4.0 adoption: The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation capabilities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 175, 121328.
• 25. Drozd, R., Wolniak, R. (2021). Metrisable assessment of the course of stream-systemic processes in vector form in industry 4.0. Quality & Quantity. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021- 01106-w
• 26. Es-Sebaiy, K., Moustaaid, J., Es-Sebaiy, K., Moustaaid, J. (2021). Optimal Berry-Esséen bound for maximum likelihood estimation of the drift parameter in α -Brownian bridge. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 50(2), 403-418.
• 27. Fairehead, E. (2021). Supplanting the spectacle of sacrifice: Drone warfare and the antispectacle of the safe military body. Media, War and Conflict, 14(4), 419-436.
• 28. Fowler, M. (2014). The strategy of drone warfare. Journal of Strategic Security, 7(4), 108-119.
• 29. Franke, J., Hefter, M., Herzwurm, A., Ritter, K., Schwaar, S. (2022). Adaptive quantile computation for Brownian bridge in change-point analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 167, 107375.
• 30. Gagaridis, A. (2022). Warfare Evolved: Drone Swarms, https://www.geopolitical monitor.com/warfare-evolved-drone-swarms/, 25.04.2022)
• 31. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R. (2021). Digitalisation and Innovation in the Steel Industry in Poland-Selected Tools of ICT in an Analysis of Statistical Data and a Case Study. Energies, 14, 3034.
• 32. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R. (2022). Influence of Industry 4.0 Projects on Business Operations: Literature and Empirical Pilot Studies Based on Case Studies in Poland. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010044.
• 33. Gao, Y., Lin, R., Lu, Y. (2022). A Visualized Analysis of the Research Current Hotspots and Trends on Innovation Chain Based on the Knowledge Map. Sustainability, 14, 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031708.
• 34. Gordon, G., Liljefors, M., Noll, G., Steuer, D. (2021). On the Future Perfect of Artificial Intelligence and War: War and Algorithm Review. Max Liljefors, Gregor Noll, and Daniel Steuer, War and Algorithm. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 26(3), 577-593.
• 35. Gray, C.H. (2018). Drones, war, and technological seduction. Technology and Culture, 59(4), 954-962.
• 36. Gregory, T. (2020). Drones and the ethics of war. The Routledge Handbook to Rethinking Ethics in International Relations, 297-311.
• 37. Gusterson, H. (2019). Drone warfare in Waziristan and the new military humanism. Current Anthropology, 60(S19), S77-S86.
• 38. Hallaq, B., Somer, T., Osula, A.-M., Ngo, K., Mitchener-Nissen, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence within the military domain and cyber warfare. European Conference on Information Warfare and Security. ECCWS, 153-156.
• 39. Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Soomro, M.A. (2021). The situation of technology companies in industry 4.0 and the open innovation. J. Open Innov., 7, 34.
• 40. http://aspoland.com/informacje-i-linki/polska-przestrzen-powietrzna-podzial-mapyelementy-aup/, 21.04.2022.
• 41. http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20190001497, 21.04.2022.
• 42. http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20190001580, 21.04.2022.
• 43. https://pl.sputniknews.com/20180531/Sputnik-bezpieczenstwo-swiat-technologie-drony8074395.html, 21.04.2022.
• 44. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bezzałogowy_statek_powietrzny, 21.04.2022.
• 45. https://rdrr.io/rforge/sde/src/R/BM.R, 21.04.2022.
• 46. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/39608-2/, 21.04.2022.
• 47. https://www.pansa.pl/loty-bvlos/, 21.04.2022.
• 48. https://www.pansa.pl/zasady-wykonywania-lotow-bsp-w-kategorii-otwartej/, 21.04.2022.
• 49. https://www.pansa.pl/zasady-wykonywania-lotow-bsp-w-kategorii-szczegolnej/, 21.04.2022.
• 50. https://www.pansa.pl/zmiany-w-pansautm/, 21.04.2022.
• 51. Iacovelli, G., Grieco, L.A. (2021). Drone swarm as mobile relaying system: A hybrid optimization approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 70(11), 12272- 12277.
• 52. Ibarra, D., Ganzarain, J., Igartua, J.I. (2017). Business model innovation through Industry 4.0: A review. Procedia Manuf., 22, 4-10.
• 53. ICAO's circular 328 AN/190: Unmanned Aircraft Systems. ICAO. Retrieved 3 February 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20081002220516/http://www.acq.osd.mil/usd/ Roadmap%20Final2.pdf#search=%22Dod%20UAS%20Roadmap%202005%22, 21.04.2022.
• 54. Ingrassia, M., Bellia, C., Giurdanella, C., Columba, P., Chironi, S. (2022). Digital Influencers, Food and Tourism-A New Model of Open Innovation for Businesses in the Ho.Re.Ca. Sector. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010050.
• 55. Jacob, F. (2017). Asymmetric was and the future of US warfare. The Future of US Warfare, 71-85.
• 56. Jeangène V. (2021). Not so remote drone warfare. International Politics.
• 57. Johnson, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: Implications for international security. Defense and Security Analysis, 35(2), 147-169.
• 58. Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Drone Swarming and Escalation Risks in Future Warfare. RUSI Journal, 165(2), 26-36.
• 59. Karatsas, I., Shreve, S. (1997). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. New York: Springer-Verlag.
• 60. Kostenko, A., Rauffet, P., Coppin, G. (2022). Supervised Classification of Operator Functional State Based on Physiological Data: Application to Drones Swarm Piloting. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 770000.
• 61. Krakowski, K. (2020). Pulled Together or Torn Asunder? Community Cohesion After Symmetric and Asymmetric Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(7-8), 1470- 1498.
• 62. Kumari, A.N.M., Varughese, S., Rao, P.V. (2020). Miniaturized ultra-wideband printed dipole array for electronic warfare applications in unmanned aerial vehicle systems. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 62(11), 3601-3610.
• 63. Latała, R. (2011). Wstęp do Analizy Stochastycznej. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.
• 64. Lee, M., Yun, J.J., Pyka, A., Won, D., Kodama, F., Schiuma, G., Park, H., Jeon, J., Park, K., Jung, K. (2018). How to Respond to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic New Combinations be-tween Technology, Market, and Society through Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 4, 21.
• 65. Lekan, A., Clinton, A., James, O. (2021). The disruptive adaptations of construction 4.0 and industry 4.0 as a pathway to a sustainable innovation and inclusive industrial technological development. Buildings, 11, 79.
• 66. Li, S., Wang, Y., Wu, C., Chen, Z. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and unmanned warfare. Proceedings of 2018, 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, CCIS 2018, 8691248, 336-339.
• 67. Li, Y., Yu, X., Sun, M., Zhang, B. (2022). Exploring the Evolution and Determinants of Open Innovation: A Perspective from Patent Citations. Sustainability, 14, 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031618.
• 68. Lu, D., Zhou, Y. (2022). The first exit time of fractional Brownian motion from the minimum and maximum parabolic domains. Statistics and Probability Letters, 186, 109467.
• 69. M., Matsatsinis, N., Marinakis, Y. (2021). Moving peak drone search problem: An online multi-swarm intelligence approach for UAV search operations. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 66, 100956.
• 70. Mack, A. (2021). Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. Power, Strategy and Security: A World Politics Reader, 126-151.
• 71. Malaviya, S. (2020). Digitising the Virtual: Movement and Relations in Drone Warfare. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(1), 80-104.
• 72. Mei, L., Shao, W. (2016). The effect of firm size on regional innovation efficiency in China. Mod. Econ., 7, 1035-1049.
• 73. Miranda, J., Rosas-Fernandez, J.B., Molina, A. (2020). Achieving Innovation and Entrepreneurship by Applying Education 4.0 and Open Innovation. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), New York, NY, USA, 15-17 June 2020, pp. 1-6.
• 74. Naqshbandi, M.M., Jasimuddin, S.M. (2022).The Linkage Between Open Innovation, Absorptive Capacity and Managerial Ties: A Cross-Country Perspective. J. Innov. Knowl., 7, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100167.
• 75. Nikitha, M.A., Sai Swetha, B.S., Mantripragada, K.H., Jayapandian, N. (2022). The Future Warfare with Multidomain Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Research Perspective. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 351, 329-341.
• 76. Norris, K. (2020). The drone threat to just war theory: responding to Braun. International Relations, 34(4), 603-607.
• 77. NSTS-01: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/69/, 21.04.2022.
• 78. NSTS-02: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/70/, 21.04.2022.
• 79. NSTS-03: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/71/, 21.04.2022.
• 80. NSTS-04: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/72/, 21.04.2022.
• 81. NSTS-05: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/73/, 21.04.2022.
• 82. NSTS-06: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/74/, 21.04.2022.
• 83. NSTS-07: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/75/, 21.04.2022.
• 84. NSTS-08: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/76/, 21.04.2022.
• 85. NSTS-09: http://edziennik.ulc.gov.pl/legalact/2020/77/, 21.04.2022.
• 86. Olkiewicz, M., Olkiewicz, A. Wolniak, R. Wyszomirski, A. (2021). Effects of proecological investments on an example of the heating industry - case study. Energies, 14(17), 5959.
• 87. Olkiewicz, M., Wolniak, R., Grebski, E.M., Olkiewicz, A. (2019). Comparative analysis of the impact of the business incubator center on the economic sustainable development of regions in USA and Poland. Sustainability, 11(1), 173.
• 88. Orzeł, B. Wolniak, R. (2022). Digitization in the Design and Construction Industry- Remote Work in the Context of Sustainability: A Study from Poland. Sustainability, 14, 1332.
• 89. Papoulis, A. (1984). "Wiener-Lévy Process." §15-3 in Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 90. Patrucco, A.S., Trabucchi, D., Frattini, F., Lynch, J. (2022). The impact of Covid-19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation. R and D Management, 52(2), 273-293.
• 91. Ragab, M., Altalbe, A., Al-Malaise ALGhamdi, A.S., Abdel-Khalek, S., Saeed, R.A. (2022). A Drones Optimal Path Planning Based on Swarm Intelligence Algorithms. Computers, Materials and Continua, 72(1), 365-380.
• 92. Rahmani, S. (2020). Death from Above: An Afghan Perspective on the US Drone War; An Interview with Emran Feroz. Boundary, 47(3), 193-200.
• 93. Rauch, M. (2021). Drones in military warfare: the moral and emotional implications of an emerging technology, 81st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2021: Bringing the Manager Back in Management, AoM.
• 94. Rawat, G., Kumar, D., Agarwal, K.N. (2021). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Warfare and National Security. 9th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions), ICRITO.
• 95. Rozmirez-Montoya, M.S., Castillo-Martinez, I.S., Sanabria-Z.J., Miranda, J. (2022). Complex Thinking in the Framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation- A Systematic Literature Review. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 4.
• 96. Rozporządzenie delegowane Komisji (UE) 2019/945 z dnia 12 marca 2019 r. wprowadza określenie "system bezzałogowego statku powietrznego", Sprostowanie, Dz.U. L 255, 4.10.2019, p. 7 (2019/945) (zmiana: BSP → SBSP). https://sip.lex.pl/aktyprawne/dzienniki-UE/rozporzadzenie-delegowane-2019-945-w-sprawie-bezzalogowychsystemow-69193393, 21.04.2022.
• 97. Rozporządzenie delegowane Komisji (UE) 2019/945 z dnia 12 marca 2019 r. w sprawie bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych oraz operatorów bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych z państw trzecich (skonsolidowane z dnia 9 sierpnia 2020); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02019R0945- 20200809&from=PL, 21.04.2022.
• 98. Rozporządzenie delegowane Komisji (UE) 2020/1058 z dnia 27 kwietnia 2020 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie delegowane (UE) 2019/945 w odniesieniu do wprowadzenia dwóch nowych klas systemów bezzałogowych statków powietrznych; https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R1058&from=PL, 21.04.2022.
• 99. Rozporządzenie Delegowanego Komisji (UE) 2019/945 z dnia 12 marca 2019 r. w sprawie bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych oraz operatorów bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych z państw trzecich, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/ ?uri=CELEX:32019R0945&from= EN, 21.04.2022.
• 100. Rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) 2019/947 z dnia 24 maja 2019 r. w sprawie przepisów i procedur dotyczących eksploatacji bezzałogowych statków powietrznych (skonsolidowane z dnia 6 czerwca 2020 r.). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02019R0947-20200606&from=PL, 21.04.2022.
• 101. Rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) 2020/639 z dnia 12 maja 2020 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie wykonawcze (UE) 2019/947 w odniesieniu do scenariuszy standardowych dla operacji wykonywanych w zasięgu widoczności wzrokowej lub poza zasięgiem widoczności wzrokowej; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/ ?uri=CELEX:32020R0639&from=EN, 21.04.2022.
• 102. Rozporządzenie wykonawcze Komisji (UE) 2020/746 z dnia 4 czerwca 2020 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie wykonawcze (UE) 2019/947 w odniesieniu do odroczenia dat rozpoczęcia stosowania niektórych środków w związku z pandemią COVID-19); https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R0746&from=PL, 21.04.2022.
• 103. Ruschi, F. (2020). The rise of drones and the transformation of warfare: A view from philosophy of international law. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito, 12(1), 147-156.
• 104. Saebi, T., Foss, N.J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. Eur. Manag. J., 33, 201-213.
• 105. Schilling, F., Soria, E., Floreano, D. (2022). On the Scalability of Vision-Based Drone Swarms in the Presence of Occlusions. IEEE Access, 10, 28133-28146.
• 106. Schulte, P. (2019). Future war: AI, drones, terrorism and counterterror. Handbook of Terrorism and Counter Terrorism Post 9/11, 416-433.
• 107. Sloane, P. (2011). A Guide to Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing. Advice from Leading Experts. London, UK Kogan: Page Limited, pp. 22-36.
• 108. Soria, E., Schiano, F., Floreano, D. (2022). Distributed Predictive Drone Swarms in Cluttered Environments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(1), 73-80.
• 109. Tice, B.P. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - The Force Multiplier of the 1990s. Airpower Journal. Archived from the original on 24 July 2009, 1991, Retrieved 6 June 2013. https://www.britannica.com/technology/unmanned-aerial-vehicle, 21.04.2022.
• 110. Valdez-Juárez, L.E., Castillo-Vergara, M., Ramos-Escobar, E.A. (2022). Innovative Business Strategies in the Face of COVID-19: An Approach to Open Innovation of SMEs in the Sonora Region of Mexico. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010047.
• 111. Vanžura, M. (2021). What Is It Like to Be a Drone Operator? Or, Remotely Extended Minds in War. Studies in Brain and Mind, 18, 211-229.
• 112. Wolfendale, J. (2021). Technology as Terrorism: Police Control Technologies and Drone Warfare. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, 13, 1-22.
• 113. Xie, M., He, Q. (2022). Solution of Smoluchowski coagulation equation for Brownian motion with TEMOM. Particuology, 70, 64-71.
• 114. Xu, M., Cheng, K. (2022). How small are the increments of G-Brownian motion. Statistics and Probability Letters, 186, 109464.
• 115. Yan, G. (2020). The impact of Artificial Intelligence on hybrid warfare. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 31(4), 898-917.
• 116. Yun, J.J., Liu, Z. (2019). Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model. Sustainability, 11, 3301.
• 117. Zaidi, A., Kazim, M., Wang, H. (2022). A Robust Backstepping Sliding Mode Controller with Chattering-Free Strategy for a Swarm of Drones. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2213(1), 012007.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).