COVID-19 pandemic impact on a global liner shipping company employee work digitalization

• Autorzy: Przybyłowski A. , Suchanek M. , Miszewski P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.16.04.18

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic that began to spread across the world in 2020 still poses a threat not only to human life and health, but also to the global economy. This situation led to the breakdown of many supply chains, and this could have resulted in the collapse of the international exchange of goods. The COVID-19 affected the shipping industries development: shipping operators, port operators, government authorities, shippers, seafarers, passengers, supply chain operators and others. The paper presents the impact of the pandemic on the working model throughout the results of a survey conducted among the office employees of a shipowner company being one of the leaders in the maritime container transport sector. It aimed to investigate the effects of the pandemic as regards the management and organisation processes in the light of digital transformation within this enterprise. Employees were asked to express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of the remote work and its influence on the way they performed their duties. At the beginning, employees were most affected by the lack of direct contact with colleagues. At the same time, many of them declared that after the end of the pandemic, they would like to combine the remote and office work . The hypothesis of this research reads as follows: as a reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new working model has been created allowing the continuity and the efficiency of operations in the maritime container sector, therefore ensuring the resilience within the global supply chains. The results prove that the transition of office workers to remote digitalised working mode allowed the company to continue operating efficiently during the first phase of the pandemic. Actually, this new mode, which was initially meant to be only a temporary solution, has become the dominant form or a combination with the traditional mode of work, creating a kind of hybrid version working model in the company.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

seafarers health problems; COVID-19 pandemic; global liner shipping company; humanlife and health; shipowner company; consequences of COVID-19 pandemic; working model; seafarers

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 16 No. 4
• Strony: 759--765
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 61 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Przybyłowski A.

• Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Suchanek M.

• University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland

autor

Miszewski P.

• Global Liner Shipping Company ‘X’, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] UNCTAD, COVID-19 and Maritime Transport Impact and Responses: Transport and Trade Facilitation Series No. 15, no. 15. 2021.
• [2] A. S. Grzelakowski, “Global container shipping market development and its impact on mega logistics system,” TransNav, vol. 13, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.12716/1001.13.03.06.
• [3] E. Czermański, G. T. Cirella, T. Notteboom, A. Oniszczuk-Jastrzabek, and B. Pawłowska, “An energy consumption approach to estimate air emission reductions in container shipping,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14020278.
• [4] J. Charłampowicz, “Maritime container terminal service quality in the face of covid-19 outbreak,” Pomorstvo, vol. 35, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31217/p.35.1.10.
• [5] A. Oyenuga, “Perspectives on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global and African maritime transport sectors, and the potential implications for Africa’s maritime governance,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13437-021-00233-3.
• [6] M. Nabipour and M. A. Ülkü, “On deploying blockchain technologies in supply chain strategies and the covid-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review and research outlook,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 19. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su131910566.
• [7] T. Notteboom, T. Pallis, and J. P. Rodrigue, “Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: the COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 23, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5.
• [8] D. Kruhlyi, “CONDITION STUDY SHIPPING DURING THE PANDEMIC,” Collect. Sci. Work. State Univ. Infrastruct. Technol. Ser. "Transport Syst. Technol., no. 36, 2020, doi: 10.32703/2617-9040-2020-36-15.
• [9] JRC European Commision, “Future of Transport : Update on the economic impacts of COVID -19,” 2020.
• [10] C. Doumbia-Henry, “Shipping and COVID-19: protecting seafarers as frontline workers,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 19, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13437-020-00217-9.
• [11] H. Prasutiyon and R. . S. Gurning, “STRATEGY SURVIVELY IN THE MIDDLE OF UNCERTAINITY PANDEMI COVID-19 MARITIME SECTOR BUSINESS,”Int. J. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.21107/ijseit.v5i1.7288.
• [12] K. Vedat, “IoT in the OSV sector,” 2020, doi: 10.2118/203222-ms.
• [13] N. Sookram, D. Ramsewak, and S. Singh, “The conceptualization of an unmanned aerial system (Uas) ship–shore delivery service for the maritime industry of trinidad,” Drones, vol. 5, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.3390/drones5030076.
• [14] A. S. Alamoush, F. Ballini, and A. I. Ölçer, “Ports, maritime transport, and industry: The immediate impact of COVID-19 and the way forward,” Marit. Technol. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.33175/mtr.2022.250092.
• [15] M. Mańkowska, M. Pluciński, I. Kotowska, and L. Filina-Dawidowicz, “Seaports during the covid-19 pandemic: The terminal operators’ tactical responses to disruptions in maritime supply chains,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14144339.
• [16] J. Y. Chua, R. Foo, K. H. Tan, and K. F. Yuen, “Maritime resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: impacts and solutions,” Contin. Resil. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1108/crr-09-2021-0031.
• [17] R. Lahyani, F. Alsaad, L. Merdad, and M. Alzamel, “Supply chain resilience vs. COVID-19 disruptions during the second wave,” in Procedia CIRP, 2021, vol. 103, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.10.006.
• [18] V. V. SABADASH and D. V. KHARCHENKO, “The Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on the Economy of Ukraine: a Sectoral Analysis of the Consequences and Opportunities for Recovery,” Mech. an Econ. Regul., vol. 2021, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.21272/mer.2021.93.01.
• [19] R. Mulić and A. Russo, “THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND ITS IMPACT ON THE MARITIME SECTOR IN CROATIA AND THE WORLD,” 2021.
• [20] A. J. Reuschl, M. K. Deist, and A. Maalaoui, “Digital transformation during a pandemic: Stretching the organizational elasticity,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 144, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.088.
• [21] M. Juchnowicz and H. Kinowska, “Employee well-being and digitalwork during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Inf., vol. 12, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.3390/info12080293.
• [22] H. Begum, K. Abbas, A. S. A. F. Alam, H. Song, M. T. Chowdhury, and A. B. Abdul Ghani, “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment and socioeconomic viability: a sustainable production chain alternative,” Foresight, vol. 24, no. 3–4, 2022, doi: 10.1108/FS-02-2021-0053.
• [23] D. M. Herold, K. Nowicka, A. Pluta-Zaremba, and S. Kummer, “COVID-19 and the pursuit of supply chain resilience: reactions and ‘lessons learned’ from logistics service providers (LSPs),” Supply Chain Manag., vol. 26, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.1108/SCM-09-2020-0439.
• [24] Ł. Marzantowicz, K. Nowicka, and M. Jedliński, “Smart „plan b” – in face with disruption of supply chains in 2020,” Logforum, vol. 16, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.17270/J.LOG.2020.486.
• [25] R. Demir and A. C. Acar, “Impact of the Global COVID-19 Pandemic on Human Resource Management Practices of Businesses,” in The Effects of the Global Pandemic Process on the Social and Economic Structure and Public Policies in Combating the Pandemic, 2021.
• [26] M. M. Queiroz, D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, and S. Fosso Wamba, “Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review,” Ann. Oper. Res., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03685-7.
• [27] S. J. Barnes, “Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 55, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175.
• [28] G. Narayanamurthy and G. Tortorella, “Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 234, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108075.
• [29] N. Baryshnikova, O. Kiriliuk, and D. Klimecka-Tatar, “Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector of the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Prod. Eng. Arch., vol. 27, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2.
• [30] J. Moosavi, J. Bakhshi, and I. Martek, “The application of industry 4.0 technologies in pandemic management: Literature review and case study,” Healthc. Anal., vol. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.health.2021.100008.
• [31] R. De’, N. Pandey, and A. Pal, “Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 55, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171.
• [32] M. DvoŔák, P. Rovný, V. Grebennikova, and M. Faminskaya, “Economic impacts of Covid-19 on the labor market and human capital,” Terra Econ., vol. 18, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-4-78-96.
• [33] R. Nagaj and B. Žuromskaitė, “Tourism in the era of covid-19 and its impact on the environment,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14072000.
• [34] M. Andrae, P. Marín-Arraiza, and A. Ferus, “COVID-19 - working in crisis,” VOEB-Mitteilungen, vol. 73, no. 3–4, 2020, doi: 10.31263/voebm.v73i3-4.5551.
• [35] Y. Zaloznova, O. Pankova, and Y. Ostafiichuk, “Global and Ukrainian Labour Markets in the Face of Digitalization Challenges and the Threats of the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Virtual Econ., vol. 3, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.34021/ve.2020.03.04(6).
• [36] M. S. Nemteanu and D. C. Dabija, “The influence of internal marketing and job satisfaction on task performance and counterproductive work behavior in an emerging marketing during the covid-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073670.
• [37] P. Soto-Acosta, “COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting Digital Transformation to a High-Speed Gear,” Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 37, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461.
• [38] I. Hamburg, “Impact of COVID-19 on SMEs and the Role of Digitalization,” Adv. Res., 2021, doi: 10.9734/air/2021/v22i330300.
• [39] B. Ronald and L. Marc, “The leadership challenge in times of the COVTD 19 pandemic - An empirical investigation on the impact of transformational leadership on motivation and team performance,” Adv. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, 2021.
• [40] L. Lebedeva and O. Moskalenko, “IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC POLICY,” Balt. J. Econ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-114-122.
• [41] P. Lord, “Changing world, changing work,” Contemp. Soc. Sci., vol. 15, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1080/21582041.2020.1812707.
• [42] A. Nelke, “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on corporate employer branding,” Tech. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 16, 2021, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v16i1.2436.
• [43] M. CătălinaTurkes, A. F. Stăncioiu, and C. A. Băltescu, “Telework During The Covid-19 Pandemic – An Approach From The Perspective Of Romanian Enterprises,” Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 23, no. 58, 2021, doi: 10.24818/EA/2021/58/700.
• [44] D. R. ORLOVA, Y. S. OTMAKHOVA, and I. A. PUZYREVA, “Post-pandemic transformation of the labor market,” Econ. Anal. Theory Pract., vol. 20, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.24891/ea.20.4.684.
• [45] P. Sanz de Miguel, M. Caprile, and J. Arasanz, “Regulating telework in a post-COVID-19 Europe,” Eur. Agency Saf. Heal. Work, 2021.
• [46] A. H. Church and S. Ezama, “2 lines Digitalization Drives the New Face of Engagement: As COVID-19 impacts the nature of work, digitalization and engagement, talent management will need to change for the future.,” People Strateg., vol. 43, no. 3, 2020.
• [47] H. Gruenwald, “Covid-19 and the New Normal compared to the Past,” Researchgate.Net, no. October, 2020.
• [48] M. Schmidtner, C. Doering, and H. Timinger, “Agile Working during COVID-19 Pandemic,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., vol. 49, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2021.3069940.
• [49] M. Kaushik, “Post COVID-19 World- A Paradigm Shift at Workplace,” Test Eng. Manag., vol. 83, no. August, 2020.
• [50] A. Bălăcescu, A. Pătrascu, and L. M. Păunescu, “Adaptability To Teleworking In European Countries,” Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 23, no. 58, 2021, doi: 10.24818/EA/2021/58/683.
• [51] H. Voznyak, K. Patytska, and T. Kloba, “THE INFLUENCE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON CHANGING THE BEHAVIOR OF ECONOMIC ENTITIES,” Green, Blue Digit. Econ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.30525/2661-5169/2021-2-2.
• [52] V. BUTKALIUK, “LABOR IN THE 21ST CENTURY: CHALLENGES OF POST-FORDISM / NEOLIBERALISM AND THE SITUATION OF WORKING PEOPLE IN THE MODERN GLOBAL WORLD,” Sociol. Theory, Methods, Mark., no. Stmm 2021 (1), 2021, doi: 10.15407/sociology2021.01.060.
• [53] M. Travar, I. Dugonjić, and S. Ristić, “Accelerated Process of Digital Transformation - The Impact and Consequences of Covid-19,” JITA - J. Inf. Technol. Appl. (Banja Luka) - APEIRON, vol. 22, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.7251/jit2102116t.
• [54] S. Roychowdhury, “ASSESSING IMPACT OF COVID PANDEMIC ON ROLE TRANSITION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF REMOTE WORKING IN THE FACE OF CHALLENGES IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,” 2021.
• [55] “The Leap into the New Normal in Creative Work: A Qualitative Study of the Impact of COVID-19 on Work Practices in Industrial Companies,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag., 2021, doi: 10.7176/ejbm/13-10-01.
• [56] Y. Griep, I. Vranjes, M. M. L. van Hooff, D. G. J. Beckers, and S. A. E. Geurts, “Technology in the Workplace: Opportunities and Challenges,” in Flexible Working Practices and Approaches, 2021.
• [57] G. Faldetta, M. L. Frigotto, A. Lazazzara, M. Marchiori, M. Pezzillo Iacono, and A. C. Scapolan, “Digital Technologies within and beyond the Workplace: Impacts, Ambiguities, and Transformative Trends,” puntOorg Int. J., vol. 6, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.19245/25.05.pij.6.2.1.
• [58] E. Szaruga, Z. Kłos‐adamkiewicz, A. Gozdek, and E. Załoga, “Linkages between energy delivery and economic growth from the point of view of sustainable development and seaports,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14144255.
• [59] W. Koznowski and A. Łebkowski, “Analysis of Hull Shape Impact on Energy Consumption in an Electric Port Tugboat,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15010339.
• [60] M. Tarkowski, K. Puzdrakiewicz, J. Jaczewska, and M. Połom, “COVID-19 lockdown in Poland – changes in regional and local mobility patterns based on Google Maps data,” Pr. Kom. Geogr. Komun. PTG, vol. 23, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.4467/2543859xpkg.20.007.12105.
• [61] D. Yazır, B. Şahin, T. L. Yip, and P. H. Tseng, “Effects of COVID-19 on maritime industry: a review,” Int. Marit. Health, vol. 71, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.5603/IMH.2020.0044.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).