Concepts of "Biophilia" and "Livability" in the context of social perception of public space in cities

• Autorzy: Jaszczak Agnieszka , Kristianova Katarina , Wasilewska Olga , Dunisijevic-Bojovic Danijela

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21005/pif.2020.42.C-02

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The work concerns the concept of biophilia and livability in the planning of public space and using that space by urban residents. The authors refer to theories discussing human-nature co-relations and sustainable planning. Nature-based solutions and multisensory of space issues are also presented, and examples of pro-ecological programs and solutions in cities are given. The work is the result of initial research undertaken by scientists from Poland, Slovakia, and Serbia, and carried out as part of larger research in the COST Action CA13177 Circular City - Implementing nature-based solutions for creating a resourceful circular city.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biophilia; livability; walkability; multisensing; smellscapes; soundscapes; sustainability

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Zachodniopomorskiego Uniwersytetu Technologicznego w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Przestrzeń i Forma
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: nr 42
• Strony: 133--146
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jaszczak Agnieszka

• Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Kristianova Katarina

• Faculty of Architecture, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia

autor

Wasilewska Olga

• Graduated Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Dunisijevic-Bojovic Danijela

• Department of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Bibliografia

• [1] Beatley T. Biophilic Cities. Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press, Washington, pp. 1-75, 2011.
• [2] Beatley T. Handbook of Biophilic City Planning and Design. Island Press. Washington, pp. 3-26, 2016.
• [3] Beatley T., Newman P. Biophilic Cities Are Sustainable, Resilient Cities. Sustainability, (5), pp. 2-15, 2013.
• [4] Bernat S. Metody badań krajobrazów dźwiękowych. UMCS, Lublin, pp. 122-133, 2008.
• [5] Bernat S. Krajobraz dźwiękowy jako przedmiot zainteresowań geografii. UMCS, Lublin, 2015.
• [6] Browning W., Ryan C., Clancy J. 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. Terrapin Bright Green, New York, pp. 3-52, 2014.
• [7] Dave S. Neighbourhood Density and Social Sustainability in Cities of Developing Countries. Sustainable Development, 19: 189–205, 2011.
• [8] Drapella-Hermansdorfer A. Urbanizacja przyrody – przyroda w kompozycji obszarów zurbanizowanych. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, no. 21: 61-68, 2008.
• [9] El-Barmelgy H. Healing Gardens’ Design. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(6): 4, 2013.
• [10] Fromm E. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 522 p., 1973
• [11] Gehl J. Cities for People, Island Press, London, 2013.
• [12] Jaszczak A., Kristianova K. Social and cultural role of greenery in development of cittaslow towns. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 603, art. no. 032028, pp. 1757-8981, 2019.
• [13] Johnson C. W. Planning and designing for the multiple use role of habitats in urban/suburban landscapes in the Great Basin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32 (3): 219–225,1995.
• [14] Kellert, S. R. The biological basis for human values of nature. In Kellert S. R., Wilson, E. O. (eds.) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, 496 p., p. 42-72, 1995.
• [15] Kellert S. R., Nature by Design. The Practice of Biophilic Design. Yale University Press, New Heaven, pp. 3- 224, 2018.
• [16] Kellert S. R., Calabrese E. F. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, www.biophilic-design.com, 2015.
• [17] Kellert S. R., Wilson, E. O. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press, Waszyngton, 496 p., p. 20-25. 1995.
• [18] Kosmala M., Błaszczyk M. Społeczny wymiar zieleni i jej wpływ na jakość życia mieszkańców miast. Przegląd komunalny, (8), pp. 51-57, 2012.
• [19] Krawczyk E, Cybulski M. Zdrowie człowieka a roślinność w mieście. Polski Przegląd Nauk o Zdrowiu 25 (4), pp. 515-520, 2010.
• [20] Krcmarova K. E. O. Wilson’s concept of biophilia and the environmental movement in the USA. Klaudyan: Internet Journal of Historical Geography and Environmental History, Vol. 6 (1-2), pp. 4-17, 2009.
• [21] Kuznietsova Y., Osychenko H. Combinatorial technique and means of integrating nature into an architectural form. Space & FORM | przestrzeń i forma 41, pp. 43-44, 2020, DOI: 10.21005/pif.2020.41.B-03.
• [22] Małkowska N. Krajobraz dźwiękowy-analiza przestrzeni publicznych na przykładzie parków w Olsztynie, Praca magisterska, UWM w Olsztynie: 32-35, 2018.
• [23] Modrzewski B., Szkołut A. Biofilia – teoria i praktyka projektowa. Conference: Biocity - Naukowy Klub Architektury; Wydział Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej, University of Technology Warsaw, Vol. I, pp. 181-187, 2014.
• [24] The Nature Conservancy. (2016). Planting healthy air: A global analysis of the role of urban trees in addressing particulate matter pollution and extreme heat. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy. Retrieved from https://thought-leadership-production.
• [25] Quercia D., Schifanella R., Aiello L. M., McLean K. Smelly Maps: The Digital Life of Urban Smellscapes, Proceedings of 9th International AAAI Conference of Web and Social Media, 2015.
• [26] Rogowski M. Multisensoryczność krajobrazu jako inspiracja w kreowaniu produktu turystycznego. UAM, Poznań, 2016.
• [27] Schafer, R. M. The book of noise, Arcana Editions, 52 p., 1998.
• [28] Simić I., Mihajlov V., Cvetković M. Green Infrastructure In Belgrade As (Re) Generative Space Of Biophilia: The Case Study Of Blocks 45, 70 and Savamala. ICUP2016 Proceedings, Niš, Serbia: November 2016.
• [29] Stankovic D., Cvetanovic A., Rancic A., Nikolic V., Stankovic B. Biophilia in Modern Architectural Practice: Recommendations for Serbia. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS 2 (17), pp. 133-143, 2019.
• [30] Stupar A., Milanković M., Grahovac A. The Reactivation of the Natural Potentials of Belgrade: Biophilia and Biomimicry as New Competitive Advantages. Arhitektura i urbanizam, 37, pp. 35-42, 2013.
• [31] Turoń K., Czech P., Juzek M. The concept of a walkable city as an alternative form of urban mobility, Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology, Series Transport, vol.95, 2017.
• [32] Ulrich, R. S. Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In Kellert S. R., Wilson, E. O. (eds.) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, 496 p., p. 73-137, 1995
• [33] Vujcic M., Tomicevic-Dubljevic J. Urban forest benefits to the younger population: The case study of the city of Belgrade, Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics 96, pp. 54-62. 2018.
• [34] Wachaczyk K. Ericha Fromma człowiek zagubiony w dychotomiach. Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe (21), p. 36, 2005.
• [35] Wilson E. O. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, 157 p., 1984.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).