Productivity Increase Through Reduced Changeover Time

• Autorzy: Karwasz A. , Chabowski P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The authors of this paper present the stages of SMED method implementation and standardization of jobs on the example of a company in the metal industry. Particular emphasis is placed on the analysis of the lathe socket, focusing on its standardization and the manner and times of changeover. The work described here is an example of introducing new solutions and improving the changeover process. The summary describes the key results of the improvements, resulting in improved availability of equipment, which in turn translates into increased productivity.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

SMED; lean manufacturing; changeover; Kaizen; standardization

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Wrocławskiej Rady FSNT NOT
• Czasopismo: Journal of Machine Engineering
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 16, No. 2
• Strony: 61--70
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Karwasz A.

• Poznan University of Technology, Department of Management and Production Engineering, Poznan, Poland

autor

Chabowski P.

• Poznan University of Technology, Department of Management and Production Engineering, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] ANG A.T.H., SIVAKUMAR A.I., Qi C., 2009, Criteria selection and analysis for single machine dynamic on-line scheduling with multiple objectives and sequence-dependent setups, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56/4, 1223-1231.
• [2] GOUBERGEN D., 2008, Set-up reduction for lean cells and multi-machine situations, International Federation for Information Processing, 257, 295-303.
• [3] HASAN M.A., SARKIS J., SHANKAR R., 2012, Agility and production flow layouts: An analytical decision analysis, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62/4, 898-907.
• [4] MALHOTRA, V., RAJ T., ARORA A., 2003, Reconfigurable manufacturing system: An overview, International Journal of Machine Intelligence, 1/2, 38-46.
• [5] MICHLOWICZ E., 2013, Logistics in production processes, Journal of Machine Engineering, 13/4, 5-17.
• [6] MOREIRA A.C., Compos Silva Pais G., 2011, Single Minute Exchange of Die: A Case Study Implementation, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 29-46.
• [7] OBORSKI P., 2015, Integration of advanced monitoring in manufacturing systems, Journal of Machine Engineering, 15/2, 55-68.
• [8] OHNO T., 2008, Toyota Production System. More than large-scale production, Wrocław, Poland, ProdPress.com, 17, ISBN 978-83-926020-8-8. (in Polish).
• [9] RAHATULAIN A., ONORI M., 2015, Production system innovation through evolvability: existing challenges & requirements, Journal of Machine Engineering, 15/3.
• [10] SCGEDIN J, SVENSSON HARARI N., JACKSON M., DELERYD M., 2016, Management of newness in an assembly system, Journal of Machine Engineering, 16/1, 92-108.
• [11] SHULL R.L., PLISKOFF S.S., 2013, Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10/6, 517-527.
• [12] WOLNIAK R., 2013, Lean Manufacturing methods and tools and how they shape innovation in industry, IZIP Conference, Zakopane, Poland, (in Polish).
• [13] WOMACK J.P., Jones D. T., 2001, Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Centrum Informacji Menadżera, Warszawa, Poland, (in Polish).
• [14] ŻYWICKI K., 2010, Improving manufacturing methods through Lean Manufacturing, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej, Budowa Maszyn i Zarządzanie Produkcją, 14, 103-121, (in Polish).

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.