Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The present study explored dynamic responses of underground circular arch structures subjected to subsurface conventional denotation. Analytical solutions were obtained through the modal superposition method. The soil–structure interaction, behaving as an interfacial damping, was included and the effect of different soils was investigated. Two soil–structure interaction models were discussed and compared. In Model I, the curvature of the structure surface and the arrival time difference were considered, while in Model II, the curvature of the structure surface was ignored but the arrival time difference to the structure was considered. Due to the complexity of the arch structure, a simplified structure model, neglecting the effect of shear and rotary inertia, was employed. The time histories of displacement, velocity and acceleration were predicted. Distributions of maximum moment and displacement were plotted using the result of responses. Blast loads in elastic designs were suggested and potential failure modes were predicted. Considering the curvature effect, Model I suggested greater reflection factors and dynamic loads subjected to the arch. Safety of structure could be evaluated by the results of responses. For safety purpose, the protective structures are better to be constructed in a site with small acoustic impedance and a large attenuation factor.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
322--333
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- State Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact, College of Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China
autor
- State Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact, College of Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China
autor
- State Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact, College of Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China
autor
- State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China
autor
- State Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact, College of Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China
Bibliografia
- [1] H. Hao, G.W. Ma, Y. Lu, Damage assessment of masonry in filled RC frames subjected to blasting induced ground excitations, Engineering Structures 24 (2002) 799-809.
- [2] G.W. Ma, H. Hao, Y.X. Zhou, Assessment of structure damage to blasting induced ground motions, Engineering Structures 22 (2000) 1378-1389.
- [3] W.J. Flathau, R.A. Breckenridge, C.K. Wiehle, Blast loading and response of underground concrete arch protective structures. ITR-1420, Operation Plumbob - Project 3.1, U.S.A. C.E. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss, 1957.
- [4] S.A. Kiger, F.D. Dallriva, R.L. Hall, Dynamic skin-friction effects on buried arches, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 115 (1989) 1768-1781.
- [5] S.A. Kiger, G.E. Albritton, Response of a buried hardened arch structure to the effects of localized explosions. Technical Report SL-79-13, U.S.A.C.E. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss, 1979.
- [6] J.P. Balsara, Similitude study of flexible buried arches subjected to blast loads, Technical Report no. 1-807, U.S.A. C.E. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss, 1968.
- [7] F.D. Dallriva, Data Report for FY 86 Dynamic Shallow-Buried Arch Test, U.S.A.C.E. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss, 1986.
- [8] T. Krauthammer, W.J. Flatau, J.L. Smith, et al., Lessons from explosive tests on RC buried arches, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 115 (1989) 810-826 .
- [9] A.A. Stamos, D.E. Beskos, Dynamic analysis of large 3-D underground structure by the BEM, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24 (1992) 917-934.
- [10] W. Yang, Finite element simulation of response of buried shelters to blast loadings, Finite Element Analysis and Design 24 (1997) 113-132.
- [11] D.J. Stevens, T. Krauthammer, A finite difference/finite element approach to dynamic soil structure interaction modeling, Computers & Structures 29 (2) (1988) 199-205.
- [12] Z.Q. Wang, Y. Lu, H. Hao, et al., A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast, Computers & Structures 83 (2005) 339-356.
- [13] Y. Lu, Z.Q. Wang, K. Chong, A comparative study of buried structure in soil subjected to blast load using 2D and 3D numerical simulation, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25 (2005) 275-288.
- [14] P. Weidlinger, E. Hinman, Analysis of underground protective structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 114 (7) (1988) 1658-1673.
- [15] H.L. Chen, S.E. Chen, Dynamic response of shallow-buried flexible plates subjected to impact loading, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 122 (1) (1996) 55-60.
- [16] W.A.M. Alwis, K.Y. Lam, Response spectrum of underground protective structures, Finite Element Analysis and Design 18 (1994) 203-209.
- [17] TM5-855-1, Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons, US Army Engineers Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, 1986.
- [18] W.J. Flathau, L.M. Bryant, P.F. Mlakar, Single-degree-of-freedom analysis of buried arches loaded by conventional ground shock, in: Proceedings of International Symposium on the Interaction of Conventional Weapons with Protective Structures, Mannheim, West Germany, 1987, pp. 285-307.
- [19] L.J. Ma, Z.Z. Zhou, B. Sun, Distribution rule of blast loads on large-span compound structures, Geotechnical Engineering Technique 22 (6) (2008) 295-298 (in Chinese).
- [20] F.N. Jin, X.J. Yuan, J.N. Zhou, et al., Distribution law of blast loads on large-span compound structure, Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition) 12 (6) (2012) 635-642 (in Chinese).
- [21] C.J. Costantino, Response of crushable foam encased buried cylinders, Ph.D. Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, 1966.
- [22] C.J. Costantino, E. Vey, Response of buried cylinders encased in foam, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 95 (No. SM5) (1969) 1159-1179.
- [23] H.F. Yuan, R.E. Walker, The investigation of a simple soil structure interaction model, in: Proceedings of a Conference Organized by the Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics Held at University of Swansea on 7-9 July, 1970.
- [24] F.S. Wong, P. Weidlinger, Design of underground protective structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 109 (8) (1983) 1972-1979.
- [25] G.W. Ma, H.Y. Zhou, Y. Lu, et al., In-structure shock of underground structures: a theoretical approach, Engineering Structures 32 (2010) 3836-3844.
- [26] H.L. Chen, F.N. Jin, H.L. Fan, Elastic responses of underground circular arches considering dynamic soil-structure interaction: a theoretical analysis, Acta Mechanica Sinica 29 (2013) 110-122.
- [27] J. Henrych, The Dynamics of Arches and Frames, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-21a774e9-0034-4e3f-a3f0-40e8b9e6782a