Ecosystem services in postglacial landscape – basic assumptions and research methodology

• Autorzy: Degórski M. , Roo-Zielińska E. , Grabińska B. , Kowalska A. , Solon J. , Affek A. , Kruczkowska B. , Wolski J. , Kołaczkowska E. , Regulska E. , Zawiska I.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Świadczenia ekosystemowe w krajobrazie młodoglacjalnym. Podstawowe założenia i metoda badań

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule przedstawiono założenia teoretyczne i metodologię badań projektu finansowanego przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2012/07/B/ST10/04344) zatytułowanego “Świadczenia ekosystemowe w krajobrazie młodoglacjalnym – ocena zasobów, zagrożeń i wykorzystania”. Celem projektu jest zastosowanie koncepcji usług ekosystemowych do oceny wartości potencjałowej środowiska przyrodniczego i kulturowego w dostarczaniu ES w trzech gminach (Nowinka, Giby, Suwałki), położonych na obszarze młodoglacjalnym.

PL

Nonetheless, to date, there has been rather a small number of scientific papers which verified in a comprehensive manner the methodological assumptions of the ES concept as a conglomerate of material and non-material benefits derived by human from natural environment and cultural heritage. Such scientific approach to ES concept has been adopted and implemented in the project “Ecosystem services in young glacial landscape – assessment of resources, threats and use” supported by National Science Centre (2012/07/ B/ST10/04344), carried out in Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences since 2012. This article presents the project objectives, assumptions and research methodology.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

potential of ecosystems; identification of ecosystem services; assessment of ecosystem services; social preferences; types of ecosystems; thematic maps of ecosystem services

PL

potencjał ekosystemów; identyfikacja usług ekosystemowych; ocena usług ekosystemowych; preferencje społeczne; typy ekosystemów; tematyczne mapy usług ekosystemowych

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 22--32
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Degórski M.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Roo-Zielińska E.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Grabińska B.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Kowalska A.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Solon J.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Affek A.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Kruczkowska B.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Wolski J.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Kołaczkowska E.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Regulska E.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

autor

Zawiska I.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Department of Geoecology and Climatology Twarda 51/55, 00–818 Warsaw

Bibliografia

• Affek A., Kowalska A., Benefits of nature. A pilot study on the perception of ecosystem services, “Ekonomia i Środowisko” 2014 no. 4(51), p. 154–160
• Bingham G. et al., Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making, “Ecological Economics” 1995 no. 14, p. 73–90
• Costanza R. et al., The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, “Nature” 1997 no. 387, p. 253–260
• Daily G.C. (ed.), Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, Washington D.C. 1997
• Daily G.C., Matson P.A., Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS” 2008 no. 105(28), p. 9455–9456
• de Groot R.S., Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making, Amsterdam 1992
• Degórski M., Solon J., Ecosystem services as a factor strengthening regional development trajectory, “Economics and Environment” 2014 no. 4(51), p. 48–57
• EEA Annual report 2013 and Environmental statement 2014. Air quality in Europe — 2013 report EEA, European Environment Agency, Kopenhagen, Denmark, Report No 9/2013
• European Commission, Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Technical Report – 2013-067, 2013
• Haines-Young R., Potschin M., Methodology for defining and assessing ecosystem services, Nottingham 2009
• Heines-Young R., Potschin M., Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on version 4, August-December 2012, EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 2013
• Helliwell D.R., Valuation of wildlife resources, “Regional Studies” 1969 no. 3, p. 41–49
• Hueting R., Functions of nature: should nature be quantified?, in: R. Hueting (ed.), What is nature worth to us? A collection of articles 1967–1970, (in Dutch) 1970
• King R.T., Wildlife and man, “Conservationist” 1966 no. 20(6), p. 8–11
• Kowalska A. et al., Potential of cultural ecosystem services in post-glacial landscape from the beneficiaries’ perspective, “Ekonomia i Środowisko”(in press)
• Kruczkowska B. et al., Map of ecosystems – concept and realization, “Geographia Polonica” (in preparation)
• Limburg K.E., Folke C., The ecology of ecosystem services: introduction to the special issue, “Ecological Economics” 1999 no. 29, p. 179–182
• Maes J. et al., Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An Analytical Framework for Ecosystem Assessments Under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An Analytical Framework for Ecosystem Assessments Under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2013
• MEA, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, vol. 1, Findings of the Condition and Trends, Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, Covelo, London 2005
• Odum E.P., Odum H.T., Natural areas as necessary components of man’s total environment, Transactions of the 37th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, March 12–15, Washington D.C., 1972 no. 37, p. 178–189
• Pimentel D. et al., Economic and Environmental Benefits of Biodiversity, “BioScience” 1997 no. 47(11), p. 747–757
• Roo-Zielińska E. et al., Potential of provisioning and regulating ecosystem services in postglacial landscape, “Ekonomia i Środowisko” 2016 no. 4(59)
• TEEB, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for local and regional policy makers, www.teebweb.org
• The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations, Pushpam Kumar (ed.), Earthscan, London, Washington 2010
• The UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UK NEA), Understanding nature’s value to society. Synthesis of the Key Findings, 2011
• Wallace K.J., Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions, “Biological Conservation” 2007 no. 139, p. 235–246
• White Cover Publication 2013, United Nations Statistic Division, www.unstats.un.org
• Wilson M.A., Carpenter S.R., Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997, “Ecological Applications” 1999 no. 9, p. 772–783
• www.ec.europa.eu

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).