Ex-ante analysis model of the cost-effectiveness of environmental policy regulations

• Autorzy: Broniewicz Elżbieta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/ACEE-2019-028

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper aims to develop a model of ex-ante cost-effectiveness analysis for regulations applied in environmental policy. The experience gained so far in applying cost-effectiveness analysis on an ex-post and ex-ante basis has been analysed. Major problems have been identified in the practical application of the ex-ante cost-effectiveness analysis in non-investment activities. On this basis, a model for the ex-ante cost-effectiveness analysis was proposed. The developed theoretical model consists of three modules: data preparation, forecasting and interpretation. The model was verified on the environmental policy regulation - greenhouse gases emissions trading system which was implemented in Poland in 2008.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cost-effectiveness analysis; environmental policy; model

PL

analiza efektywności kosztowej; polityka ekologiczna; model

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 2
• Strony: 119--130
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Broniewicz Elżbieta

• Associate Prof., PhD Eng.; Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Str. 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Małecki P. (2011). Efektywność kosztowa jako metoda oceny projektów inwestycyjnych w ochronie środowiska, (Cost-effectiveness as a method of assessing investment projects in environmental protection), Cracow Review of Economics and Management, 80/2011.
• [2] European Commission (2009). Scoping study on costeffectiveness of EU environmental policy, Directorate-General Environment.
• [3] Baumol W.J. and Oates W.E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• [4] Opschoor J.B. and Turner R.K. (1994). Economic Incentives and Environmental Policies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
• [5] Costanza R. (ed.) (1991). Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York.
• [6] Pearce D.W. and Turner R.K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York. 7] Folmer H., Gabel H. L. and Opschoor J.B. (eds.) (1995)., Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics: A Guide for Students and Decision Makers. Edward Elgar, Brookfield, US.
• [8] Bergh van den J.C.J.M. (1996). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development: Theory, Methods and Applications, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
• [9] European Commission (1997). Evaluating EU expenditure programmes: A guide: ex post and intermediate evaluation, Brussels.
• [10] 2000/60/EC Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy, (OJ L 327).
• [11] 2001/77/EC Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market and Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140/16).
• [12] 2001/81/EC Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants (OJ L 309).
• [13] Görlach B., Interwies E., Newcombe J. and Johns H. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of environmental policies. An inventory of applied ex post evaluation studies with a focus on methodologies, guidelines and good practice, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
• [14] Hazilla M. and Kopp R.J. (1990). Social cost of environmental quality regulations: A general equilibrium analysis, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98. Retrieved from http://bazy.pb.edu.pl:3159/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=881f1e52-1036-4241-acc9-022cc3cc917b%40sessionmgr111&hid=117. (Accessed 1 June 2018).
• [15] Harrington W., Morgenstern R.D. and Nelson P. (1999). On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates, Discussion Paper 99-18. Retrieved from http://www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-99-18.pdf. (Accessed 21 September 2018).
• [16] Harrington W., Morgenstern R.D. and Nelson P. (2010). How Accurate Are Regulatory Cost Estimates?, Resources for the Future. Retrieved from http://grist.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/harringtonm orgensternnelson_regulatory_estimates.pdf. (Accessed 11 December 2018).
• [17] Clean Air Act (1990) (104 Stat. 2468, P.L. 101-549) USA.
• [18] Broniewicz E. (2015). Analiza ex ante efektywności kosztowej polityki ekologicznej (eng. Ex ante costeffectiveness analysis of environmental policy), Bialystok University of Technology Publishing House, Poland.
• [19] Eurostat (2008). Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. NACE Rev. 2. Methodologies and Working papers, Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF (Accessed 1 September 2018).

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).