Application of multi-criteria approach for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes

• Autorzy: Kluczek A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mper-2016-0026

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper is to present a multi-criteria approach for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes, which can be applied to carry out the sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes requiring less detailed data, time, and expert knowledge, but still providing a company-level analysis. The analytical hierarchy process method is used to determine ranking of simple and relevant activity areas for manufacturing processes in terms of sustainability objectives. Analytical technique is also employed to assess the degree of sustainability in manufacturing due to limited information which appear to be a characteristic of the case study presented. One goal of sustainability characterization methodology is to improve the manufacturing sustainability performance. Similar to the baseline scenario, sustainability reevaluation for sustainability improvement is also applied and discuses performance profile at the process level. This approach seems particularly useful when comparing different processes. It makes applicable for various industries and might be a challenge to derive priorities for systematic improvement. The applicability and usability of the proposed assessment method was verified by the case study in company producing heating devices.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multi-criteria decision analysis; analytical hierarchy process; sustainability assessment; manufacturing

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 7, No. 3
• Strony: 62--78
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 65 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kluczek A.

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Production Engineering, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Rosen M.A., Kishawy H.A., Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs, Sustainability, 4, 154-174, 2012.
• [2] Goyal P., Rahman Z., Corporate sustainability performance assessment: an analytical hierarchy process approach, Int. J. Intercultural Information Management, 4, 1, 1-14, 2014.
• [3] STPI (Science and Technology Policy Institute), White Papers on Advanced Manufacturing Questions. Advanced Manufacturing Workshop of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology’s Study on Creating New Industries through Science, Technology, and Innovation, Science and Technology, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Washington D.C., 2014.
• [4] Geldermann J., Rentz O., Multi-criteria analysis for technique assessment case study from industrial coating, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 3, 127-142, 2005.
• [5] Buckley G., Henriques M., Salazar-Xirinach J.M., The promotion of sustainable enterprises, International Labour Organization, Geneva, 2009.
• [6] Van der Heijden A., Driessen P.P.J., Cramer J.M., Making sense of corporate social responsibility: exploring organizational processes and strategies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1787-1796, 2010.
• [7] Savitz A.W., Weber K., The triple bottom line, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2006.
• [8] Sutherland J.W., Rivera J.L., Brown K.L., Law M., Hutchins M.J., Jenkins, T.L., Haapala K.R., Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier, Challenges for the Manufacturing Enterprise to Achieve Sustainable Development, 2008.
• [9] Hauff M., Wilderer P.A., Industrial ecology: engineered representation of sustainability, Sustainability Science, 3, 103-115, 2008.
• [10] Lu T., Gupta A., Jayal A.D., Badurdeen F., Feng S.C., Jr O.W.D., Jawahir I.S., A framework of product and process metrics for sustainable manufacturing, [in:] Advances in Sustainable Manufacturing, G. Seliger, M.M.K. Khraisheh and I.S. Jawahir [Eds.], Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 333-338, 2011.
• [11] Reich-Weiser C., Vijayaraghavan A., Dornfeld D., Metrics for sustainable manufacturing, Proceedings of the 2008 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Illinois, October 2008.
• [12] Jawahir I.S., Badurdeen F., Assessment of product and process sustainability: towards developing metrics for sustainable manufacturing, Proceedings of the NIST Workshop on Sustainable Manufacturing, NIST, Washington D.C, 2009.
• [13] Zhang H., Haapala K.R., Integrating sustainable manufacturing assessment into decision making for a production work cell, Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 52-63, 2015.
• [14] Mani M., Madan J., Leeb J.H., Lyons K.W., Gupta S.K., Sustainability characterization for manufacturing processes, International Journal of Production Research, 52, 20, 5895-5912, 2014.
• [15] Saaty T.L., Analytic hierarchy process, McGrawHill, New York, 1980.
• [16] Chan F.T.S., Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach, International Journal Production Research, 41, 15, 3549-3579, 2003.
• [17] Cinelli M., Coles S.R., Kirwan K., Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment, Ecological Indicators, 46, 138-148, 2014.
• [18] Despeisse M., Mbaye F., Ball P.D., Levers A., The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices, Production Planning & Control, 23, 5, 354-376, 2012.
• [19] Kluczek A., Application of best available techniques in an enterprise producing heating devices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 444-45, 2014.
• [20] Chen D., Thiede S., Schudeleit T., Herrmann C., A holistic and rapid sustainability assessment tool for manufacturing SMEs, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 63, 437-44, 2014.
• [21] Guang X., Wang Y., Tao L., Machining scheme selection of digital manufacturing based on genetic algorithm and AHP, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 6, 661-669, 2009.
• [22] Vaidya O.S., Kumar S., Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1-29, 2006.
• [23] Vargas R.V., Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select and prioritize projects in portfolio, 2010-North America, PMI Global Congress, Washington, 2010.
• [24] Keeney R.L., Raiffa, H., Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, New York, Wiley, 1993.
• [25] Hermann B.G., Kroeze C., Jawjit W., Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1787-1796, 2007.
• [26] Khalili N.R., Duecker S., Application of multicriteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 188-198, 2013.
• [27] Steele K., Carmel Y., Cross J., Wilcox C., Uses and misuses of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision-making, Risk Analysis, 29, 1, 26-33, 2009.
• [28] Triantaphyllou E., Baig K., The impact of aggregating benefit and cost criteria in four MCDA methods, Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 52, 2, 213-226, 2005.
• [29] Liu F.H.F., Hai H.L., The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 3, 308-317, 2005.
• [30] Kornfeld B., Kara S., Project portfolio selection in continuous improvement, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 10, 1071-1088, 2011.
• [31] Dimache E., Roche T., A decision methodology to support servitisation of manufacturing, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33, 11/12, 1435-1457, 2012.
• [32] Martinsuo M., Project portfolio management in practice and in context, International Journal of Project Management, 31, 6, 794-803, 2013.
• [33] Kłos S., Trebiina P., Using the AHP method to select an ERP system for an SME manufacturing company, Management and Production Engineering Review, 5, 3, 14-22, 2014.
• [34] Varela L.R., Ribeiro R.A., Evaluation of simulated annealing to solve fuzzy optimization problems, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 14, 2, 59- 72, 2003.
• [35] Arrais-Castro A., Varela M.L.R., Putnik G.D., Ribeiro R.A., Dargam F., Collaborative negotiation platform for networked organizations using dynamic multi-criteria decision model, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 7, 1, 1-14, 2014.
• [36] Jassbi J.J., Ribeiro R.A., Varela M.L.R., Dynamic MCDM with future knowledge for supplier selection, Journal of Decision Systems, Knowledge-Based Decision Systems, 23, 3, 232-248, 2014.
• [37] Vieira G.G., Varela L.R., Ribeiro R.A., A knowledge based system for supporting sustainable industrial management in a clothes manufacturing company based on a data fusion model, S. Liu et al. [Eds.], Decision Support Systems VI - Addressing Sustainability and Societal Challenges, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP) 250, pp. 113-126, 2016.
• [38] Schau E.M., Fet A.M., Assessing the ecological soundness of organic and conventional agriculture by means of life cycle assessment (LCA) - a case study of leek production, British Food Journal, 111, 10, 1028-1061, 2009.
• [39] Kengpol A., Boonkanit P., The development and application of a decision support methodology for product eco-design: a study of engineering firms in Thailand, International Journal of Management, 27, 1, 185-202, 2010.
• [40] Dan Z., Yu X., Yin X., Bai Y., Song D., Duan N., An analysis of the original driving forces behind the promotion of compulsory cleaner production assessment in key enterprises of China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 4, 8-14, 2013.
• [41] Principi P., Fioretti R., A comparative life cycle assessment of luminaires for general lighting for the office - compact fluorescent (CFL) vs Light Emitting Diode (LED) - a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 96-107, 2014.
• [42] Kluczek A., Assessment of the eco-efficiency of manufacturing processes based on MFA-LCAMFCA methods, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, in press.
• [43] Feng S.C., Joung C.B., An overview of a proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing, Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, 2009.
• [44] Goyal P., Rahman Z., Corporate sustainability performance assessment: an analytical hierarchy process approach, International Journal of Intercultural. Information Management, 4, 1-14, 2014.
• [45] Bertoni M., Hallstedt S., Ola I., A model-based approach for sustainability and value assessment in the aerospace value chain, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7, 6, 1-19, 2015.
• [46] Agarwal P., Sahai M., Mishra V., Bag M., Singh V., A review of multi-criteria decision making techniques for supplier evaluation and selection, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2, 801-810, 2011.
• [47] Coyle G., The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Practical Strategy: Structured Tools and Techniques, Pearson Education, Glasgow, 2004.
• [48] Sudarsan R., Sriram, R.D., Narayanan, A., Sarkar P., Lee J.-H., Lyons K.W., Kemmerer S.J., Sustainable manufacturing: metrics, standards, and infrastructure - workshop summary, Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2010 IEEE Conference on 21-24 Aug. 2010.
• [49] Cziner K., Tuomaala M., Hurme M., Multi-criteria decision making in process integration, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 475-483, 2005.
• [50] Honkasalo N., Rodhe H., Dalhammar C., Environmental permitting as a driver for eco-efficiency in the dairy sector: a closer look at the IPPC Directive, ournal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1049-1060, 2005.
• [51] Goodson R.E., Read a Plant Fast, Harvard Business Review, 80, 5, 105-113, 2002.
• [52] Lehmar K., Facility logistics. Approaches and Solutions to the next generations challenges, Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, 2008.
• [53] Quintero R.R., Genty A., Vieitez E.R., Wolf O., Development of green public procurement criteria for water-based heaters, Technical Report and Draft Criteria Proposal, JRC Science and Policy Reports, 2014.
• [54] Bai S-W., Zhang J-S., Wang Z., Methodology for evaluating cleaner production in the stone processing industry: case study of a Shandong stone processing firm, Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 461-476, 2015.
• [55] Jayal A.D., Badurdeen F., Dillon Jr O.W., Jawahir I.S., Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2, 144-152, 2010.
• [56] Ulewicz R., Jelonek D., Mazur M., Implementation of logic flow in planning and production control, Management and Production Engineering Review, 7, 1, 89-94, 2016.
• [57] Widyaningrum D., Masruroh N.A., Development of the sea fishery supply chain performance measurement system: a case study, International Journal Supply Chain Management, 1, 3, 2012.
• [58] Gupta V., Supply Chain management - a three dimensional framework, Journal of Management Research, 5, 4, 76-97, 2013.
• [59] Ho W., Xu X., Dey P.K., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 16-24, 2010.
• [60] Morgan J.M., Liker J.K., The Toyota product development system: integrating people, process, and technology, Productivity Press, New York, USA, 2006.
• [61] Brugha C.M., Structure of multi-criteria decisionmaking, Journal of Operational Research Society, 55, 11, 1156-1168, 2004.
• [62] Triantaphyllou E., Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges, International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2, 1, 35-44, 1995.
• [63] Oyatoye E.O., Okpokpo G.U., Adekoya G.A., An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to investment portfolio selection in the banking sector of the Nigerian capital market, Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2, 12, 321-335, 2010.
• [64] Dahlgaard J.J., Kristensen, K., Kanji G.K., Fundamentals of total quality management, process analysis and improvement, Taylor&Francis, London New York, 2002.
• [65] Kluczek A., Gladysz B., Analytical Hierarchy Process/Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution-based approach to the generation of environmental improvement options for painting process. Results from an industrial case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 360-367, 2015.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.