Virtual patient case: study of a urinary incontinence therapy procedure in a woman

• Autorzy: Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K. , Piwowar M. , Migdał M. , Skotniczny K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/bams-2014-0007

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to present a case of virtual patient with urinary incontinence (UI), the treatment especially based on the new muscle-derived stem cell (MDSC) procedure. With the use of e-learning systems, the UI patient’s classical follow-up as well as MDSC sphincter injection therapy are shown. The “Virtual Patient” case allowed us to demonstrate the main results and the creation of a robotic system from the MDSC study. In this way, the authors will disseminate the new procedure developed in Collegium Medicum JU in UI patients. The “Virtual Patient” case may help students get involved in this new procedure along the main program.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

MDSC therapy; medical robotics; simulation base learning; stress urinary incontinence; Virtual Patient

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet Jagielloński - Collegium Medicum ; Index Copernicus Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 10, no. 3
• Strony: 151--157
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K.

• Department of Gynaecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland

autor

Piwowar M.

• Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Ƚazrza 16 Street 31-530, Cracow 31-530, Poland

autor

Migdał M.

• Department of Gynaecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland

autor

Skotniczny K.

• Department of Gynaecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Buckley BS, Lapitan MC. Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 2008. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children-current evidence: findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Urology 2010;76:265–70.
• 2. Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol 2011;186:589–93.
• 3. Tennstedt SL, Link CL, Steers WD, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of and risk factors for urine leakage in a racially and ethnically diverse population of adults: the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:390–9.
• 4. Couture JA, Valiquette L. Urinary incontinence. Ann Pharmacother 2000;34:646–55. Review.
• 5. Vij M, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Emerging drugs for treatment of urinary incontinence. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2010;15:299–308.
• 6. Okano H, Nakamura M, Yoshida K, Okada Y, Tsuji O, Nori S, et al. Steps toward safe cell therapy using induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ Res 2013;112:523–33.
• 7. Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011;2011:852061. doi:10.1155/2011/852061. Epub 2011 Nov 28. PubMed PMID: 22190948.
• 8. Csorba R. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Orv Hetil 2012;153:967–72.
• 9. Swan K, Advincula AP. Advances in urogynaecological robotic surgery. BJU 2011;10:1024–7.
• 10. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;150:92–6.
• 11. Nikolavasky D, Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K, Stec M, Chancellor MB. Stem cell therapy: a future treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Semin Reprod Med 2011;29:61–70.
• 12. Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K, Jarocha D, Piwowar M, Jach R, Uhl T, Basta A, et al. Autologous muscle-derived cells for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 2-year follow-up of a Polish investigation. Neurourol Urodyn 2014;33:324–30.
• 13. Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K, Majka M, Basta A, Stec M, Pabian W, Piwowar M, et al. Adult stem cells therapy for urine incontinence in women. Ginekol Pol 2010;81:378–81.
• 14. Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K, Małgorzata S, Nikolavsky D, Chancellor MB. Cellular therapy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2010;5:57–62.
• 15. Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K, Petko M, Basta A, Karpiel G. rozdział. Opracowanie robotów do wspomagania nowej metody leczenia wysiłkowego nietrzymania moczu u kobiet z wykorzystaniem komórek macierzystych, praca zbiorowa pod redakcją Tedeusza Uhla: “Projektowanie Mechatroniczne”, Kraków 2014, ISBN 978-83-7789 (in press).
• 16. CASUS: http://evip.casus.net.
• 17. Bateman J, Davies D. Virtual patients: are we in a new era? Acad Med 2011;86:151; author reply 151.
• 18. Moss R, Grosse T, Marchant I, Lassau N, Gueyffier F, Thomas SR. Virtual patients and sensitivity analysis of the Guyton model of blood pressure regulation: towards individualized models of whole-body physiology. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002571.
• 19. Bateman J, Allen ME, Kidd J, Parsons N, Davies D. Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:62.
• 20. Pataki C, Pato MT, Sugar J, Rizzo AS, Parsons TD, St George C, et al. Virtual patients as novel teaching tools in psychiatry. Acad Psych 2012;36:398–400.
• 21. Oliven A, Nave R, Hasson-Gilad DR, Baruch A. [Medical students’ views on the use of virtual patients for teaching and assessment of clinical knowledge and reasoning]. Harefuah 2013;152: 257–61, 310.
• 22. Bateman J, Hariman C, Nassrally M. Virtual patients can be used to teach clinical reasoning. Clin Teach 2012;9:133–4.
• 23. Benedict N. Virtual patients and problem-based learning in advanced therapeutics. Am J Pharm Educ 2010;74:143.
• 24. Hege I, Ropp V, Adler M, Radon K, Mäsch G, Lyon H, et al. Experiences with different integration strategies of case-based e-learning. Med Teach 2007;29:791–7.
• 25. Kononowicz AA, Krawczyk P, Cebula G, Dembkowska M, Drab E, Frączek B, et al. Effects of introducing a voluntary virtual patient module to a basic life support with an automated external defibrillator course: a randomised trial. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:41.
• 26. Abrams P, Incontinence. 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, July 5–8, 2008. 4th ed. [Paris]: Health Publications.
• 27. Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010;85:1589–602.
• 28. Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 2009;43:303–11.
• 29. Gunning WT, Fors UG. Virtual patients for assessment of medical student ability to integrate clinical and laboratory data to develop differential diagnoses: comparison of results of exams with/without time constraints. Med Teach 2012;34:e222–8.
• 30. Poulton T, Balasubramaniam C. Virtual patients: a year of change. Med Teach 2011;33:933–7.
• 31. Piwowar M, Ostachowska-Gąsior A. Electronic nutritional virtual case – simulation dietary procedure on the basis of patient with obesity and diabetes type 2. 7th International Conference on Diabetes & Obesity, 2013; Riga, Latvia.
• 32. Piwowar M, Kulaga T, Guratowska M, Stachon A, Kononowicz A. Genomic Virtual patients – the learning way not only for medical doctor. Bio-Algorith Med-Syst 2010;6:11.
• 33. McEvoy MM, Butler B, MacCarrick G, Nicholson AJ. Virtual patients: an effective educational intervention to improve paediatric basic specialist trainee education in the management of suspected child abuse? Ir Med J 2011;104:250–2.
• 34. Jabbur-Lopes MO, Mesquita AR, Silva LM, De Almeida Neto A, Lyra Jr DP. Virtual patients in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ 2012;76:92.