Digital assets for project-based studies and data-driven project management

• Autorzy: Miller Gloria J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15439/2020F94

• Konferencja: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (15 ; 06-09.09.2020 ; Sofia, Bulgaria)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Projects offer learning opportunities and digital data that can be analyzed through a multitude of theoretical lenses. They are key vehicles for economic and social action, and they are also a primary source of innovation, research, and organizational change. This research involves a survey of digital assets available through a project; specifically, it identifies sources of data that can be used for practicing data-driven, context-specific project management, or for project-based academic research. It identified four categories of data sources - communications, reports/records, model representations, and computer systems - and 48 digital assets. The list of digital assets can be inputs in the creation of project artifacts and sources for monitoring and controlling project activities and for sense-making in retrospectives or lessons learned. Moreover, this categorization is useful for decision support and artificial intelligence systems model development that requires real-world data.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

artificial intelligence; data analysis; decision support systems; organisational aspect; project management

PL

sztuczna inteligencja; analiza danych; systemy wspomagania decyzji; aspekt organizacyjny; zarządzanie projektami

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne
• Czasopismo: Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 21
• Strony: 591--594
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Miller Gloria J.

• Managing Consultant maxmetrics Heidelberg, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1. R. A. Lundin and A. Söderholm, "A theory of temporary organization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 11, no. pp. 437-455, 1995.
• 2. N. Drouin, R. Müller, and S. Sankaran, Novel Approaches to Organizational Project Management Research: Translational and Transformational. Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2013.
• 3. C. Snider, J. A. Gopsill, S. L. Jones, L. Emanuel, and B. J. Hicks, "Engineering Project Health Management: A Computational Approach for Project Management Support Through Analytics of Digital Engineering Activity," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 325-336, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2846400.
• 4. A. Jensen, C. Thuesen, and J. Geraldi, "The Projectification of Everything: Projects as a Human Condition," Project Management Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 21-34, Jun 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700303.
• 5. R. A. Lundin, "Project Society: Paths and Challenges," Project Management Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 7-15, Aug 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700402.
• 6. J. Geraldi and J. Söderlund, "Project studies and engaged scholarship: Directions towards contextualized and reflexive research on projects," International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 767-797, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2016-0016.
• 7. C. Besner and B. Hobbs, "An Empirical Identification of Project Management Toolsets and a Comparison Among Project Types," Project Management Journal, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 24--46, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21292.
• 8. H. K. Doloi, "Understanding stakeholders' perspective of cost estimation in project management," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 622-636, Jul 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.001.
• 9. PMI, "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) --Sixth Edition," Sixth Edition ed. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States: Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017.
• 10. APM, "APM Body of Knowledge 6th Edition," ed. Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom: Association for Project Management, 2012.
• 11. ISO, "ISO 21500: 2012 Guidance on project management," vol. International Standards Organization, ed. Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
• 12. S. Duffield and S. J. Whitty, "Developing a systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 311-324, Feb 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.004.
• 13. J. Whyte, "How Digital Information Transforms Project Delivery Models," Project Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 177- 194, Apr 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/8756972818823304.
• 14. K. S. K. Chung and L. Crawford, "The Role of Social Networks Theory and Methodology for Project Stakeholder Management," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 226, no. pp. 372- 380, Jul 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.201.
• 15. L. Hossain and A. Wu, "Communications network centrality correlates to organisational coordination," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 795-811, Nov 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02.003.
• 16. M. Takahashi, M. Indulska, and J. Steen, "Collaborative Research Project Networks," Project Management Journal, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 36-52, Aug 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/8756972818781630.
• 17. L. L. Willems and M. Vanhoucke, "Classification of articles and journals on project control and earned value management," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1610-1634, Oct 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.003.
• 18. H. R. Nemati, D. W. Todd, and P. D. Brown, "A hybrid intelligent system to facilitate information system project management activities," Project Management Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 42- 52, Sep 2002, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F875697280203300306.
• 19. P. Eskerod and M. Huemann, "Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say," International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36-50, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291017.
• 20. S. Quinton and N. Reynolds, Understanding research in the digital age: Sage, 2018.

Uwagi

1. Track 4: Information Systems and Technology

2. Technical Session: 15th Conference on Information Systems Management

3. Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).