Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The paper describes the evaluation of the pedestrian kinematics after a collision with a Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) with a high bumper. To meet the goal two approaches were chosen. First, the authors carried out the SUV to pedestrian strike simulation using the certified, finite element lower legform impactor. The impact procedure mirrored the car vs. pedestrian collision described in the current Regulation (EC) 78/2009. However, it has been earlier noticed that the overall pedestrian kinematics response may vastly differ if the lower legform impactor hits a car with a high bumper. To evaluate this, an ellipsoid, standing Hybrid III dummy model was also investigated. Subsequent tests of the dummy model, impacted by the high-bonnet vehicle, confirmed that the stand-alone subsystem test with impactors leads to inaccurate assessment of the actual, after impact, pedestrian kinematics.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
68--73
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- Wrocław University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 50–370 Wrocław, Poland
autor
- Wrocław University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 50–370 Wrocław, Poland
autor
- Wrocław University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 50–370 Wrocław, Poland
autor
- Wrocław Medical University, Department and Clinic of Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Surgery, 50–556 Wrocław, Poland
Bibliografia
- [1] European Commission, Move to Improved Pedestrian Safety by 2009, IP/08/964, Brussels, 2008.
- [2] B. Bartczak, D. Gierczycka-Zbrozek, Z. Gronostajski, S. Polak, A. Tobota, The use of thin-walled sections for energy absorbing components: a review, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 10 (4) (2010) 5–19.
- [3] D. Severy, H. Brink, Auto-Pedestrian Collision Experiments Using Full-Scale Accident Simulation. SAE Paper No. 660080, Detroit: SAE, 1966.
- [4] A. Fisher, R. Hall, The influence of car frontal design on pedestrian accident trauma, Accident Analysis and Prevention (1972) 47–58.
- [5] C. Simms, D. Wood, Pedestrian and Cyclist Impact: A Biomechanical Perspective, Springer, London-New York, 2009.
- [6] European Transport Safety Council,CRASH,ETSC,Brussels,2003.
- [7] ARUP: A New Pedestrian Lower Legform Model for LS-DYNA, ARUP, 2003.
- [8] European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EC) No 78/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, 2009.
- [9] Y. Matsui, A. Wittek, A. Konosu, Comparison of Pedestrian Subsystem Safety Tests Using Impactors and Full-Scale Dummy Tests, Pedestrian Safety, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 2002, pp. 39–54.
- [10] M. Ptak, J. Karlinski, A. Kopczynski, Analysis of pedestrian passive safety with the use of numerical simulation, Journal of KONES 17 (1) (2010) 337–342.
- [11] E. Rusinski, J. Czmochowski, T. Smolnicki, Advanced Finite Element Method for Load-Carrying Structures of Machines, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr, Wrocław, 2000.
- [12] J. van Hoof, R. De Lange, J. Wismans, Improving pedestrian safety using numerical human models, Stapp Car Crash Journal 47 (2003) 401–405.
- [13] MADYMO Model Manual R7.0, TASS, 2008.
- [14] Y. Mizuno, Summary of IHRA pedestrian Safety Working Group Activities Proposed Test Methods to Evaluate Pedestrian Protection Offered by Passenger Cars, in: Proceedings of the Experimental Safety Vehicles Conference. Washington, ESV Paper No. 05-0138-O, 2005.
- [15] D. Nakane, S. Kuwahara, Y. Ozeki, et al., Analysis of loading of lower extremities based on bending moment in car-to-pedestrian collisions, International Journal of Crashworthiness 15 (5) (2010) 481–490.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-2002b065-2abc-4cd1-9aa6-8c4d65f54fdd