Wellbeing versus Sustainable Development – Conceptual Framework and Application Challenges

Dłużewska, A.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Wellbeing versus Sustainable Development – Conceptual Framework and Application Challenges

Autorzy

Dłużewska A.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Dobrostan a zrównoważony rozwój – struktura koncepcyjna oraz wyzwania wdrożeniowe

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The idea of sustainable development introduced the strong connection between human wellbeing and the state of natural environment. In the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) perspective, wellbeing is correlated with sustainable development and with ecosystem services, both seen as inextricable elements of one global process, necessary to lead properly Our common future. An important consequence of MA is the necessity for wellbeing strategies to be implemented by governments of many countries, including member states of the European Union. In spite of appearances, this is not an easy task not as much with regard to the difficulties in application (obvious for every type of activity) as with regard to the specific mess in defining what wellbeing is. The aim of this paper is to contribute to wellbeing and sustainability research by presenting a relational conceptualization of wellbeing. The paper is divided into three sections. The author begins with the presentation of wellbeing conceptual background, including Gross National product (GDP), Human Development Index (HDI), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) monetary valuation, Concept of Capabilities, Societal Indicators, QoL and ecosystems wellbeing theory. The second section focuses on subjective wellbeing conceptual framework, including hedonic and eudaimonic accounts, the Self Determination Theory, the Theory of Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis and finally the Responsible Wellbeing one. The third section discuss how wellbeing is presented in official directives and policies such a Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 5 dimensions valuation and its implementations in different countries.

Koncepcja zrównoważonego rozwoju jako pierwsza dostrzegła istnienie znaczących wzajemnych zależności między dobrostanem człowieka (wellbeing) a jakością środowiska naturalnego. W dokumentach Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) dobrostan człowieka, zrównoważony rozwój oraz świadczenia ekosystemów postrzegane są już jako ściśle ze sobą związane, nierozłączne składowe większego, globalnego procesu. Ich dobre funkcjonowanie uznane zostało za konieczne do właściwego pokierowania Naszą wspólną przyszłością. Ważną konsekwencją publikacji dokumentów milenijnych jest konieczność wdrażania ustalonych wytycznych dotyczących dobrostanu człowieka, do narodowych strategii rozwoju wielu państw, w tym państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej. Wbrew pozorom nie jest to zadanie łatwe, nie tyle ze względu na trudności aplikacyjne (typowe dla wszelkiego typu dyrektyw), co ze względu na brak zgodności, co do tego, czym właściwie jest rzeczony dobrostan, a co za tym idzie – jak należy go zdefiniować. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie struktury koncepcyjnej pojęcia dobrostan. Artykuł podzielony został na trzy części. W pierwszej zaprezentowane zostały podstawy koncepcyjne pojęcia, w tym koncepcje Produktu Krajowego Brutto (PKB), Indeksu Rozwoju Społecznego (HDI), Materialnych Wskaźników Postępu Genuine (GPI), Koncepcja Zdolności, Koncepcja Wskaźników Społecznych, Teoria QoL oraz Teoria Dobrostanu Ekosystemów. Druga część skupia się na strukturze koncepcyjnej dobrostanu subiektywnego, w tym na ujęciu hedonicznym i eudaimonicznym, Teorii Samookreślenia, Teorii Homeostazy oraz na Teorii Dobrostanu Odpowiedzialnego. W ostatniej, trzeciej części, dyskutowane jest, jak dobrostan rozumiany w wybranych dyrektywach i strategiach na szczeblu międzynarodowym, w tym w 5 płaszczyznowej koncepcji opublikowanej w dokumentach Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, oraz jak prezentuje się polityka wdrożeniowa w tym zakresie w wybranych krajach.

Słowa kluczowe

well-being societal indicators subjective wellbeing responsible wellbeing sustainable development

dobrostan wskaźniki społeczne dobrostan subiektywny dobrostan odpowiedzialny rozwój zrównoważony

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2017

Tom

Vol. 12, nr 2

Strony

89--97

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 56 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Dłużewska A.

dluzewska.a@gmail.com

Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej, Wydział Nauk o Ziemi i Gospodarki Przestrzennej, Al. Kraśnicka 2 cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

1. ALLARDT E., 1993, Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research, in: The quality of life, ed. Nussbaum M., Sen A., Clarendon, Oxford, p. 88-94.
2. ALLARDT E., UUSITALO H., 1972, Dimensions of welfare in a comparative study with the Scandinavian societies, in: Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 7, p. 9-26.
3. ANDREWS F. M., WITHEY S. B., 1976, Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality, Plenum Press, New York.
4. APPADURAI A., 2004, The capacity to aspire: Culture and the Term of Recognition, in: Cultural politics in a Global Age. Uncertainty, Solidarity and Innovation, ed. Rao V., Walton M., Oneworld Publications, Oxford, p. 29-35.
5. BECKER R. A., DENBY L., MC GILL R., WILKS A. R., 1987, Analysis of data from the Places Rated Almanac, in: The American Statistician, vol. 41, no 3, p. 169-186.
6. BLACKMORE S., 2009, Responsible wellbeing and its implications for development policies, WeD Working Paper 09/47.
7. BRADBURN N. M., 1969, The structure of psychological well-being, Aldine, Oxford.
8. BROCK D., 1993, Quality of life in health care and medical ethics, in: The quality of life, ed. Nussbuam M., Sen A., Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 95-132.
9. BROWN K. W., KASSER, T., 2005, Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 74, no 2, p. 349-368.
10. CAMPBELL A., P. E., CONVERSE, RODGERS, W. L., 1976, The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
11. CONDON J. T., BOYCE P., CORKINDALE C. J., 2004, The first‐time fathers study: A prospective study of the mental health and wellbeing of men during the transition to parenthood, in: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 38, no 1-2, p. 56-64.
12. COPESTAKE J., 2009, Development and wellbeing in Peru: Comparing global and local views, WeD Working Paper 09/48.
13. COPESTAKE J., CAMPFIELD L., 2009, Measuring subjective wellbeing in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Peru and Thailand using a personal life goal satisfaction approach, WeD Working Paper 09/45.
14. CUMMINS R. A., 1998, The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 43, no 3, p. 307-334.
15. CUMMINS R. A., ECKERSLEY R., PALLANT J., VAN VUGT J., MISAJON R., 2003, Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 64, no 2, p. 159-190.
16. DE BRUIJN K, DIRVEN R, EIJGELAAR E, PEETERS P., 2010, Travelling Large in 2008. The Carbon Footprint of Dutch Holidaymakers in 2008 and the Development since 2002. NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, NRIT Research, NBTC-NIPO Research: Breda, The Netherlands.
17. DENEULIN S., MCGREGOR J. S., 2009, The capability approach and the politics of the social conception of wellbeing, WeD Working Paper 09/43.
18. DIENER E., 1995, A value based index for measuring national quality of life, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 36, no 2, p. 107-127.
19. DIENER E., SUH E. M., 1996, Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 40, no 1, p. 189-216.
20. DŁUŻEWSKA A. 2016A. Cultural ecosystem services – Framework, Theories and Practices, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no 1, p. 101-110.
21. DŁUŻEWSKA A., 2016B, Wellbeing – Conceptual Background and Research Practices, in: Društvena istraživanja, vol. 25, no 4, p. 547-567.
22. DWYER L, FORSYTH P, SPURR R, HOQUE S., 2010, Estimating the carbon footprint of Australian tourism, in: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 18, p. 355-376.
23. FRY P. S., 2000, Religious involvement, spirituality and personal meaning for life: Existential predictors of psychological wellbeing in community-residing and institutional care elders, in: Aging & Mental Health, vol. 4, no 4, p. 375-387.
24. GARDNER J., OSWALD A. J., 2007, Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins, in: Journal of Health Economics, vol. 26, no 1, p. 49-60.
25. GIDDINGS B., HOPWOOD B., O´BRIEN G., 2002, Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 10, p. 187-196.
26. HAILA Y. 2009, Mutual interdependence of humanity and the rest of the nature, in: Perspectives to Global Social Development, ed. Perkiö M., Tampere University Press: Tampere, Finland, p. 165-176.
27. HALL C. M., SCOTT D., GÖSSLING S., 2013, The primacy of climate change for sustainable international tourism, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 21, no 2, p. 112-121.
28. HALSTEAD T., 1998, The science and politics of new measures of progress: a United States perspective, in: Measuring progress: Is life getting better? ed. Eckersley R., CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, p. 53-68.
29. HAMILTON C., 1998, Measuring changes in economic welfare: The genuine progress indicator for Australia, in: Measuring progress: Is life getting better? ed. Eckersley R., CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, p. 69-92.
30. KAHNEMAN D., KRUEGER A. B., SCHKADE D., SCHWARZ N., STONE A. A., 2006, Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion, in: Science, vol. 312, no 5782, p. 1908-1910.
31. KJELL O., 2011, Well-being: a potential synergy between sustainability and well-being research, in: Review of General Psychology, vol. 15, no 3, p. 255-266.
32. LAI D., 2000, Temporal analysis of human development indicators: Principal components approach, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 51, no 3, p. 331-366.
33. LAND K. C., 1996, Social indicators and the quality of life: Where do we stand in the mid-1990s?, in: SINET, vol. 45, p. 5-8.
34. MARMOT M., 2004, Status syndrome, Bloomsbury, London.
35. MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2003, Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
36. MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis/ current state and trends/ scenarios/ policy responses/ multiscale assessments, Island Press, Washington, DC.
37. NAESS A., 1995, Self-realization. An ecological approach to being in the world, in: Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, MA Sessions G, ed. Shambhala: Boston, p. 225-245.
38. PEETERS P, GÖSSLING S, LANE B., 2009, Moving towards low-carbon tourism: new opportunities for destinations and tour operators, in: Sustainable Tourism Futures: Perspectives on Systems, Restructuring and Innovations, eds. Gössling S, Hall CM, Weaver D., Routledge, London, p. 240-257.
39. PERCH-NIELSEN S, SESARTIC A, STUCKI M., 2010, The greenhouse gas intensity of the tourism sector: the case of Switzerland, in: Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 13, p. 131-140.
40. PRESCOTT A. R., 2001, The wellbeing of nations, Island Press, Washington.
41. REDEFINING PROGRESS, 1995, What’s wrong with the GDP as a measure of progress?, in: The Genuine Progress Indicator: Summary of Data and Methodology, p. 2-9.
42. RYAN R. M., DECI E. L., 2000, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, in: American Psychologist, vol. 55, no 1, p. 68-78.
43. RYAN R. M., DECI E. L., 2001, On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, in: Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 52, no 1, p. 141-166.
44. RYFF C. D., KEYES C. L. M., 1995, The structure of psychological well-being revisited, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 69, no 4, p. 719-727.
45. SHEA W.R., 1976, Introduction: The quest for a high quality of life, in: Values and the quality of life, eds. Shea W.R., King-Farlow J., Science History Publications, New York, p.1-5.
46. SCHWARTZ S. H., 1994, Beyond individualism and collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values, in: Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, eds. Kim U., Triandis H.C., Kagitcibasi C., Choi C., Yoon G., CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks, p. 85-102.
47. SCOTT D, AMELUNG B, BECKEN S, CERON J-P, DUBOIS G, GÖSSLING S, PEETERS P, SIMPSON M., 2008, Technical report. In Climate Change and Tourism: Responding to Global Challenges. UNWTO: Madrid; UNEP: Paris; WMO, Geneva; p. 23-250.
48. SCOTT D, PEETERS P, GÖSSLING S., 2010, Can tourism deliver its ‘aspirational’ emission reduction targets? in: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 18, p. 393-408.
49. SEN A., 1985, Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984, in: The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, no 4, p. 169-221.
50. THOITS P. A., HEWITT L. N., 2001, Volunteer work and well-being, in: Journal of Health and Social Behavior, vol. 42, no 2, p. 115-131.
51. TUULA H., & TUULI H., 2015, Wellbeing and sustainability: A relational approach, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 23, no 3, p. 167-175.
52. UNDP, 2003, Human Development Report 2003: Millennium Development Goals: A Compact among Nations to End Human Poverty, UNDP, New York.
53. WATERMAN A. S., 1993, Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 64, no 4, p. 678-691.
54. WHITE S., 2009, Analysing wellbeing: A framework for development practice, WeD Working Paper 09/44.
55. WILSON J., 1972, The industrial process and the quality of life, in: Technology assessment and quality of life, eds. Stober G.J., Schumacher D., Proceedings of the 4th General Conference of SAINT. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Salzburg, Austria, p. 131-146.
56. WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-20005363-da56-4131-a2be-e5f6626dc646