The Identification of the Luhansk Region and the Region Act’s According to the Qualification of Their Sustainable Development in the Conditions of the Joint Forces Operation

Zablodska, Inna; Hrechana, Svitlana; Zablodska, Daria

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

The Identification of the Luhansk Region and the Region Act’s According to the Qualification of Their Sustainable Development in the Conditions of the Joint Forces Operation

Autorzy

Zablodska Inna , Hrechana Svitlana , Zablodska Daria

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Identyfikacja regionu Ługańska i regionalnego prawa zgodnie z wymaganiami zrównoważonego rozwoju w warunkach Operacji Wspólnych Sił

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Each region has its own set of unique characteristics, which should create the basis for their growth and give residents a sense of home and safety. This article develops an approach to identifying a region and its amalgamated territorial communities in order to identify their strengths and values, based on the example of Luhansk region, which, due to ongoing military aggression, has significant development problems. It is proposed to quantify the results of complementary analysis of sustainable development indicators by quantitatively qualitative transformation of such indicators and rating points into a gradient of territorial features, which is visualized using the quantification axis to determine the unique characteristics of region. The application of such methodology for identifying a region greatly simplifies the process of identifying the benefits and values of a region in order to properly position and build an effective socio-economic development strategy.

Każdy region ma swój własny zestaw unikalnych cech, które powinny stanowić podstawę rozwoju i dać mieszkańcom poczucie przebywania we własnym domu i bezpieczeństwa. W tym artykule opracowano temat identyfikacji regionu i jego połączonych społeczności terytorialnych w celu określenia ich mocnych stron i wartości, na podstawie regionu Ługańska, który z powodu trwającej agresji wojskowej cierpi na poważne problemy rozwojowe. Proponuje się kwantyfikację wyników uzupełniającej analizy wskaźników zrównoważonego rozwoju poprzez ilościowo-jakościową transformację takich wskaźników i punktów oceny w gradient cech terytorialnych, który jest wizualizowany za pomocą osi kwantyfikacji, w celu określenia unikalnych cech regionu. Zastosowanie takiej metodologii do identyfikacji regionu znacznie upraszcza proces identyfikacji korzyści i wartości regionu w celu właściwego pozycjonowania i zbudowania skutecznej strategii rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego.

Słowa kluczowe

identification region amalgamated territorial communities sustainable development quantification Joint Forces Operation

identyfikacja region połączone społeczności terytorialne rozwój zrównoważony ujęcie ilościowe Operacja Wspólnych Sił

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2020

Tom

Vol. 15, nr 1

Strony

197--210

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 41 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zablodska Inna

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Interregional Cooperation Problems, Institute of Economic and Legal Research, Str. Marii Kapnist 2, 323, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

autor

Hrechana Svitlana

svigrech@gmail.com

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Interregional Cooperation Problems, Institute of Economic and Legal Research, Str. Marii Kapnist 2, 323, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

autor

Zablodska Daria

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Interregional Cooperation Problems, Institute of Economic and Legal Research, Str. Marii Kapnist 2, 323, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

Bibliografia

1. AQUINO K., REED A., THAU S., FREEMAN D.,2007, A Grotesque and Dark Beauty: How Moral Identity and Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Influence Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to War, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, p. 385-392.
2. BERNARDO F., ALMEIDA J., MARTINS C., 2016, Urban identity and tourism: different looks, one single place, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-urban Design and Planning, 170(5), p. 205-216.
3. BURKE P. J., 1991, Identity Processes and Social Stress, in: American Sociological Review, 56, p. 836-849.
4. BURKE P. J., STETS J. E., 2009, Identity Change, in: Identity Theory, eds Burke P. J., Stets J. E., Oxford University Press, New York, p. 175-196.
5. CARTER M. J., 2013, Advancing Identity Theory:Examining the Relationship between Activated Identities and Behavior in Different Social Contexts, in: Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(3), p. 203-223.
6. CSURGÓ B., SZATMÁRI A., 2019, Vidéki kultúra, helyi közösség és lokális identitás A kulturális örökség szerepe a lokális identitásépítésben és a közösségfejlesztésben Hajdúdorogon és Hajdúhadházon, in: Metszetek, 8(2).
7. DECENTRALIZATION POWER IN UKRAINE, 2017, Local Budget Revenue for 2016, https:// decentralization.gov.ua/uploads/attachment/document/23/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%BC_%D1%81%D1%86_%D0%B1%D1%8E%D0%B4%D0%B6%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%B0_2016.pdf (04.09.2019).
8. DECENTRALIZATION POWER IN UKRAINE, 2018, Evaluation of the financial viability of 366 ATC`s for 2017 by regions, https:// decentralization.gov.ua/uploads/library/file/183/366.pdf (04.09.2019).
9. DECENTRALIZATION POWER IN UKRAINE, 2019a, Luhansk Region, https://storage.decentralization.gov.ua/uploads/attachment/document/361/%D0%9B%D0%A3%D0%93%D0%90%D0%9D%D0%A1_%D0%9A%D0%90_%D0%9E%D0%91%D0%9B%D0%90%D0%A1%D0%A2_.pdf (04.09.2019).
10. DECENTRALIZATION POWER IN UKRAINE, 2019b, Competition that is agemate of decentralisation. Over 170 best local self-government practices presented to Ukraine, https:// decentralization.gov. ua/en/news/11934 (14.11.2019).
11. DEFFNER A., METAXAS T., 2007, Place marketing, local identity, and cultural planning: The CultMark INTERREG IIIc project, in: DPRD Discussion Paper Series, 13(16), p. 367-380.
12. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE LUHANSK REGIONAL STATE ADMINISTRATION, 2019, Regional Report of the environment state in the Luhansk Region in 2018, http://www.eco-lugansk.gov.ua/images/docs/Dopovid_pro_stan_navkolushnogo_prurod_seredov/Regionalna_dopovid_2018.pdf (10.10.2019).
13. FELSON R. B., 1985, Reflected Appraisal and the Development of Self, in: Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, p. 71-78.
14. GERENCSÉR I., 2019, The role of individual responsibility in territorial development, in: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(4), p. 220-233.
15. HOGG M. A., ABRAMS D., 1988, Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes, Routledge, London.
16. KORZHOV H., 2010, Territorial identities: conceptual interpretations in modern foreign sociological thought, in: Sociology: Theory, Methods and Marketing, 1, p. 107-124.
17. LUHANSK REGIONAL STATE ADMINISTRATION, 2019, Implementation Results of the socioeconomic development program, http://loga.gov.ua/oda/about/depart/economy/se_state/result(22.11.2019).
18. MINISTRY FOR COMMUNITIES AND TERRITORIES DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE, 2019, Regional Ranking Assessment for 2018,http://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Reytingova-otsinka-za-2018-rikprezentatsiyni-materiali.pdf (05.11.2019).
19. MINISTRY FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT,CONSTRUCTION, HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES OF UKRAINE, 2018, Ratingscore regions by 2017, http://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Reytingovaotsinka-za-2017-rik-prezentatsiyni-materiali.pdf (05.11.2019).
20. MINISTRY FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT,CONSTRUCTION, HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES OF UKRAINE, 2017, Ratingscore regions by 2016, http:// www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Reytingovaotsinka-za-2016-rik-prezentatsiyni-materiali.pdf (05.11.2019).
21. MINISTRY FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES OF UKRAINE, 2016, Ratingscore regions by 2015, http://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Otsinka-sotsialnoekonomichnogo-rozvitku-regioniv-za-2015-r.-prezentatsiyni-materiali2.pdf (05.11.2019).
22. MURDOCH J., 2000, Networks – a new paradigm of rural development? in: Journal Of Rural Studies, 16(4), p. 407–419.
23. NAHORNA L.P., 2008, Regional identity: the Ukrainian context, Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
24. OKTAY D., 2002, The quest for urban identity in the changing context of the city: Northern Cyprus. in: Cities, 19, p. 261-271.
25. SABATIER P.A., JENKINS-SMITH H.C., 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Colation Approach, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, p. 4-33.
26. SHAO Y., LANGE E., THWAITES K., 2017, Defining Local Identity, in: Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 5(2), p. 24-41.
27. SEMENENKO I., HALHASH R., SIERIEBRIAK K., 2019, Sustainable development of regions in Ukraine: before and after the beginning of the conflict. in: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(2), p. 317-339.
28. STETS J. E., 2006, Identity Theory, in: Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by Burke P., J. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, CA, p. 88-110.
29. STRYKER S., [1980] 2002, Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version, Caldwell, Blackburn Press, NJ.
30. PRITCHARD A., MORGAN N. J., 2001, Culture, identity and tourism representation: marketing Cymru or Wales?, in: Tourism Management, 22, p. 167-179.
31. RASZKOWSKI A., 2014, Towards local development based on territorial identity, in: Regional Economy and Policy. Territories and Cities, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, p. 32-37.
32. RAZUMKOV CENTRE, 2019, The Donbass War:The Realities and Prospects of Settlement (working version of the analytical report), http://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2019_Donbas.pdf. (22.10.2019).
33. STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE, 2019, Regional Statistics, http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (05.11.2019).
34. STATISTICAL PUBLICATION REGIONS OF UKRAINE 2018, 2018, ed. by Verne I., Part І, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Kyiv.
35. STETS J. E., BURKE P. J., 2005, Identity Verification, Control, and Aggression in Marriage, in: Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, p. 160-178.
36. STETS J. E., CARTER M. J., 2006, The Moral Identity: A Principle Level Identity, in Purpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology, eds McClelland K., Fararo T. J., Palgrave MacMillan, New York, p. 293-316.
37. STETS J. E., CARTER, M. J., 2011, The Moral Self: Applying Identity Theory, in: Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, p. 192-215.
38. STRYKER S., 1980, Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version, Menlo Park, Benjamin Cummings.
39. UKRINFORM, 2019, Speech by the President of Ukraine at the debate of the UN General Assembly: The situation in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubricworld/2644704-porosenko-genasamblei-oon-rosiane-demonstrue-zodnogo-namiru-zupinitisa.html (20.02.2019).
40. UNDP UKRAINE, 2018, Peacebuilding Assessment: An Analysis of the Impact of the Crisis and Needs in Eastern Ukraine. Part I: Summary report, https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine /uk/home/library/poverty/Recovery_and_Peacebuilding_Assessment_ukr_vol1.html, (20.02.2019).
41. USTYMENKO V.A., ZABLODSKA I.V., BURBELO S.О., ZABLODSKA D.V., SAENKO P.O., 2019, Identification and Positioning of the United Territorial Municipalities: Methodical Tools, in: Economics and Law, 1(52), p. 44-50.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-1fcfd402-30f6-4945-9d32-f7bb8064f89e