Economic development model and effective path of green industry

• Autorzy: Tian Wen , Zhang Xin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/eces-2022-0029

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Major crises such as greenhouse effect and resource depletion remind people that environmental protection is imminent. However, the economic growth is always accompanied by the destruction of the environment, so the development of green industry economy is very necessary for the balance between the two. However, many of today’s green industry economic development is still in the theoretical stage, and there are no substantive measures. Therefore, this paper aims to build a reasonable development evaluation model for the green industry economy, and use the results of the model to explore the sustainable development of the green industry economy. In view of this, in the stage of proposing the model, this paper refers to a large number of literature and field investigation, and selects 30 suitable evaluation indexes. The experimental results of the green industrial economy in Sichuan Province with the designed model show that the comprehensive evaluation index of green economic development has increased steadily. It reached 0.8255 in 2016, which is in line with the actual situation. This shows that the model in this paper has a good fitting effect, and can provide guidance for the economic development model and effective path of green industry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

green industry; green economy; development model; effective path; evaluation model

PL

zielony przemysł; zielona ekonomia; model rozwoju; efektywność; model oceny

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering. S
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 29, nr 3
• Strony: 403--418
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Tian Wen

• Party School of Baoding Municipal Committee of C.P.C, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4442-5591

autor

Zhang Xin

• Business College, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, Zhejiang, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8617-6984

Bibliografia

• [1] Gasparatos A, Doll C, Esteban M, Olang TA, Ahmed A. Renewable energy and biodiversity: implications for transitioning to a green economy. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2017;70:161-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030.
• [2] Mazzanti M, Rizzo U. Diversely moving towards a green economy: Techno-organisational decarbonisation trajectories and environmental policy in EU sectors. Technological Forecasting Social Change. 2017;115:111-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.026.
• [3] Pan SY, Gao M, Kim H, Chiang PC, Pei SL, Shah KJ. Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: barriers and strategies. Renew Energy. 2019;132:19-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.126.
• [4] Glazyrina IP, Zabelina IA. Spatial heterogeneity of Russia in the light of the concept of a green economy: the social context. Geography Natural Resources. 2018;39(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372818020026.
• [5] Caprotti F. Protecting innovative niches in the green economy: investigating the rise and fall of Solyndra, 2005-2011. GeoJournal. 2017;82(5):937-55. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-016-9722-2.
• [6] Antonioli D, Mazzanti M. Towards a green economy through innovations: the role of trade union involvement. Ecol Economics. 2017;131:286-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.003.
• [7] Buseth JT. The green economy in Tanzania: from global discourses to institutionalization. Geoforum. 2017;86:42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.015.
• [8] Adams WM. Sleeping with the enemy? Biodiversity conservation, corporations and the green economy. J Political Ecol. 2017;24(1):243-57. DOI: 10.2458/v24i1.20804.
• [9] Abdullah H, Bakar NA, Jali MR, Ibrahim FW. The current state of Malaysia’s journey towards a green economy: the perceptions of the companies on environmental efficiency and sustainability. Int J Energy Economics Policy. 2017;7(1):253-8. Available from: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/3707.
• [10] Kasztelan A. Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: terminological and relational discourse. Prague Economic Papers. 2017;26(4):487-99. DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.626.
• [11] Mendoza M. Post-neoliberal labor in Patagonia: informality and citizenship in the green economy. Dialectical Anthropol. 2017;41:55-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10624-017-9446-9.
• [12] Bobby MN, Indira M, Peele KA. Venkateswrulu TC, Krupanidhi S. Sustainable nutritional supplementation for green economy through hydroponics system. Indian J Ecol. 2021;48(1):85-90. Available from: https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/7384453.
• [13] Tousi SN, Malekkhani A. Measurement framework for assessing Iran’s provincial state in terms of green economy concept. J Environ Studies. 2021;44(4):661-88. DOI: 10.22059/JES.2019.252330.1007599.
• [14] Ovcharenko R, Goncharova O, Kondratenko E, Maltseva O. State policy in the field of formation of "green economy" in Russia. Amazonia Investiga. 2021;10(42):141-8. DOI: 10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.13.
• [15] Tu TTT, Yen TTH. Green bank: international experiences and Vietnam perspectives. Asian Social Sci. 2015;11(28):188-99. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v11n28p188.
• [16] Ali AHS. Societal green economy and its impact on sustainable development. Int J Sust Development Planning. 2021;16(1):105-14. DOI: 10.18280/ijsdp.160111.
• [17] Vishnevsky VP, Harkushenko OM, Zanizdra MY, Kniaziev SI. Digital and green economy: common grounds and contradictions. Sci Innovation. 2021;17(3):14-27. DOI: 10.15407/scine17.03.014.
• [18] Yumei H, Iqbal W, Irfan M, Fatima A. The dynamics of public spending on sustainable green economy: role of technological innovation and industrial structure effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;29(16):22970-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17407-4.
• [19] Huang S, Ma S, Pan Y, Li Y, Yuan Y, Tsai S. An empirical study on how climate and environmental issues awareness affects low carbon use behaviour. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2020;27(1):55-66. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2020-0003.
• [20] Wu C. An empirical study on discussion and evaluation of green university. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(1):75-85. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0007.