PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Residue characteristics of seven fungicides in cherry tomatoes and vegetable tomatoes

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A modified QuEChERS method using a GC-ECD to determine the multiple residues of pyraclostrobin, difenoconazole, dimethomorph and azoxystrobin and to indirectly determine the total residues of maneb, mancozeb and propineb by a GC-FPD (with an S filter) was established and validated. Meanwhile, field trials were conducted in accordance with good agricultural practice (GAP) to study their characteristics of residue degradation under the agricultural climate and cropping system of Guangxi Province. The separation effect of each target peak was good with a linearity range of 0.01–5 mg L⁻¹, a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.003–0.015 mg kg⁻¹ and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.01–0.05 mg kg⁻¹. The average recovery ranges of vegetable tomatoes and cherry tomatoes were 70.5–120.0% and 70.8–119.8%, respectively, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of less than 7.1%. Field trials of seven fungicides in vegetable and cherry tomatoes showed that the half-lives (t1/2) of the dithiocarbamate fungicides (metiram, mancozeb, and propineb, defined as total residues determined as CS2), pyraclostrobin, difenoconazole, dimethomorph, and azoxystrobin were in the ranges of 5.2, 12.7–17.8, 7.6–7.9, 6.6–6.9, and 6.3–6.6 d in vegetable tomatoes, respectively. The cherry tomatoes presented ranges of 4.3–4.5, 10.8–11.8, 6.7–7.0, 5.4–5.5, and 5.9–6.2 d, respectively. Combined with the final residue and market monitoring results, the results show that cherry tomatoes have significantly higher terminal residues, initial deposits, and maximum residues of seven fungicides than vegetable tomatoes, and these seven pesticides can be detected in cherry tomatoes purchased from three markets. Therefore, cherry tomatoes may be regarded as representative varieties of tomatoes in realizing residual extrapolation for the establishment of the maximum residue limit (MRL) value of fungicides in tomatoes and for conducting market monitoring.
Rocznik
Strony
70--80
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Guangxi University, No. 100 East University Rd., Nanning, Guangxi Provence, 530004, China
autor
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Guangxi University, No. 100 East University Rd., Nanning, Guangxi Provence, 530004, China
autor
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Guangxi University, No. 100 East University Rd., Nanning, Guangxi Provence, 530004, China
autor
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Guangxi University, No. 100 East University Rd., Nanning, Guangxi Provence, 530004, China
Bibliografia
  • 1. Salehi, B.; Sharifi-Rad, R.; Sharopov, F.; Namiesnik, J.; Roointan, A.; Kamle, M.; Kumar, P.; Martins, N.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Nutrition 2019, 62, 201–8.
  • 2. Zhao, P.; Huang, B.; Li, Y.; Han, Y.; Zou, N.; Gu, K.; Li, X.; Pan, C. J. Agr Food Chem. 2014, 62(17), 3710–25.
  • 3. Li, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, R.; Jiang, Y. China Vegetables 2011, 1(7), 32–4.
  • 4. Kong, F.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z. China Vegetable 2013, 1(1), 1–4.
  • 5. Jones, J., Jr; Benton. Tomato Plant Culture: in the Field, Greenhouse, and Home Garden; CRC press, 2007.
  • 6. Dhaliwal, M.S.; Jindal, S.K.; Sharma, A.; Prasanna, H.C. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 95(4), 425–44.
  • 7. Panno, S.; Davino, S.; Caruso, A. G.; Bertacca, S.; Crnogorac, A.; Mandic, A.; Noris, E.; Matic, S. Agronomy 2021, 11(11), 2188.
  • 8. Schiavi, D.; Balbi, R.; Giovagnoli, S.; Camaioni, E.; Botticella, E.; Sestili, F.; Balestra, G.M. Nanomaterials 2021, 11(7), 1852.
  • 9. Skandalis, N.; Dimopoulou, A.; Beri, D.; Tzima, A.; Malandraki, I.; Theologidis, I.; Bitivanos, S.; Varveri, C.; Klitsinaris, T.; Vassilakos, N. Plant Dis. 2016, 100(7), 1321–30.
  • 10 Washington, W.S.; McGee, P. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2000, 29(1), 46–51.
  • 11. Fenik, J.; Tankiewicz, M.; Biziuk, M. Trac Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30(6), 814–26.
  • 12. Park, J.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Kim, B.M.; Oh, J.H.; Do, J.A.; Kwon, K.S.; Shim, K.H.; Choi, O.J.; Shin, S.C.; Shim, J.H. Food Chem. 2011, 128(1), 241–53.
  • 13. Hernández, A.F.; Parrón, T.; Tsatsakis, A.M.; Requena, M.; Alarcón, R.; López-Guarnido, O. Toxicology 2013, 307, 136–45.
  • 14. Singh, N.S.; Sharma, R.; Parween, T.; Patanjali, P.K. Modern Age Environmental Problems and Their Remediation; Springer: Cham, 2018; pp 49–68.
  • 15. Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. GB 2763-2019 National Food Safety Standard-Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food; Standards Press of China, China, CN: Beijing, 2019.
  • 16. Peng, X.; Zhao, Z.; Kang, J.; Wang, Z.; Chang, Q.; Fan, C.; Pang, G.; Lu, M. Anal. Lab. 2014, 33(3), 282–91.
  • 17. Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals Standard Operating Procedureson Pesticide Registration Residue Field Trials; Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, CN, 2007.
  • 18. Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China NY/T788-2018 Guideline on Pesticide Residue Trials; Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, CN, 2018.
  • 19. Japan Ministry of agriculture, Forestry,and fishing(MAFF). No.12-Nouan-8147. Data Requirements for Supporting Registration of Pesticides. Studies of Residues in Succeeding Crops, 2000.
  • 20. EU.No.SANTE/12682/2019. Guidance Document on Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residues and Analysis in Food and Feed, 2020.
  • 21. CAC Codex Committee on pesticide residues (CCPR). CAC/GL 90-2017.Guidelines on Performance Criteria for Methods of Analysis for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Food and Feed; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health organization, 2017.
  • 22. OECD.C(81)30/FINAL and C (89) 87/FINAL.Council Decision Concerning the Adherence of Non-member Countries to the Council Acts Related to the Mutual Acceptance of Data in the Assessment of Chemicals, 1997.
  • 23. Zhang, Y. Pestic. Market News 2019, 640(01), 42–4.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-1f78ed91-56f1-4a61-8488-c5a90b649396
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.