Production engineering tools for civil engineering practice – the case of FMEA

• Autorzy: Dytczak M. , Ginda G.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/2353737XCT.17.171.7279

Warianty tytułu

PL

Narzędzia inżynierii produkcji w budownictwie – przypadek FMEA

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article is the first of a series of papers which discuss the usefulness of production engineering tools for general civil engineering. Applications of selected production engineering tools in civil engineering are presented in these papers. The diverse nature of the tools is considered while outlining detailed areas of their application in civil engineering. The features of the tools make them representative of production engineering methodology. Thus, information about the civil engineering applications of the tools also makes it possible to draw practical conclusions about the general usefulness of production engineering methodology in civil engineering. The applications of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) are utilised in this regard in the article.

PL

Artykuł rozpoczyna cykl prac poświęconych użyteczności narzędzi inżynierii produkcji w szeroko pojmowanym budownictwie. Uwzględniając zróżnicowany charakter wybranych narzędzi inżynierii produkcji, przedstawiono w cyklu szczegółowe obszary ich zastosowań w budownictwie. Cechy wybranych narzędzi sprawiają, że dobrze ilustrują one metodykę inżynierii produkcji. Dlatego, na podstawie informacji dotyczących ich zastosowań w budownictwie, można sformułować praktyczne wnioski na temat przydatności metod inżynierii produkcji w budownictwie. W artykule wykorzystano w tym celu narzędzie FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

civil engineering; construction; decision; support; production engineering; tool; application; FMEA

PL

budownictwo; decyzja; wspomaganie; inżynieria produkcji; narzędzie; zastosowanie; FMEA

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki
• Czasopismo: Technical Transactions
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 10(114)
• Strony: 85--92
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Dytczak M.

• Department of Management in Power Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology

autor

Ginda G.

• Department of Management in Power Engineering, Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology

Bibliografia

• [1] Halevi G., Handbook of Production Management Methods, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford 2001.
• [2] Hamrol A., Zarządzanie jakością z przykładami, WN PWN, Warszawa 2007.
• [3] Burati J.L., Jr., Matthews M.F., Kalidindi S.N., Quality management in construction industry, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(2)/1991, 341–359.
• [4] Hensey M., Essential tools of total quality management, Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4)/1993, 329–339.
• [5] Farooqui R.U., Ahmed S.M., A total quality approach to streamlining ethical behaviours in the construction industry, Proceedings, Annual Conference – Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 3/2009, 1235–1244.
• [6] Farooqui R.U., Ahmed S.M., Suggestions for a leadership based total quality management model, Proceedings, Annual Conference – Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 3/2009, 1245–1255.
• [7] Shao B., Wang F., Chen Z., Research on applying the total quality management to implicit cost control in construction projects, Advanced Materials Research, 368–373/2012, 3150–3154.
• [8] Onodera Katsushige, Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle stage, Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1997, 50–56.
• [9] El-Haram M.A., Horner M.W., Practical application of RCM to local authority housing: A pilot study, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8(2)/2002, 135–143.
• [10] Davis C.R., Johnson P.A., Miller A.C., Selection of Erosion Control Measures for Highway Construction, World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, 2003, 262–271.
• [11] Liaudanskiene R., Ustinovichius L., Review of risk assessment methods and the peculiarities of their application at construction sites, 10th International Conference Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, 2010, 446–450.
• [12] Balocco C., Capone P., Construction site risk analysis based on Shannon entropy: A case study application, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 82/2005, 171–181.
• [13] Cheng M., Lu Y., Developing a risk assessment method for complex pipe jacking construction projects, Automation in Construction, 58/2015, 48–59.
• [14] Patricio R.P., Catai R.E., Michaud C.R., Nagalli A., Model of risk management based in the FMEA technique – A case study in the construction of gabions, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18 S/2013, 4183–4199.
• [15] Zeng S.X., Tam C.M., Tam V.W.Y., Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks for project management using a FMEA method, Engineering Economics, 21(1)/2010, 44–52.
• [16] Wehbe F.A., Hamzeh F.R., Failure mode and effect analysis as a tool for risk management in construction planning, 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2013, IGLC 2013, 2013, 685–694.
• [17] Ghorbani A., Ravanshadnia M., Nobakht M., A Survey of Risks in Public Private Partnership Highway Projects in Iran, ICCREM 2014: Smart Construction and Management in the Context of New Technology – Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, 2014, 482–492.
• [18] Jozi S., Seyfosadat S., Environmental risk assessment of Gotvand-Olia dam at operational phase using the integrated method of environmental failure mode and effects analysis (EFMEA) and preliminary hazard analysis, Journal of Environmental Studies, 40/2014, 107–120.
• [19] Lee K.-L., Su Y., Applying six sigma to quality improvement in construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(4)/2013, 464–470.
• [20] Wang B.-Q., Men Y.-M., Earth anchor failure models and effect analysis, Xi’an Jianzhu Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 45(2)/2013, 228–232–244.
• [21] Song J.-W., Yu J.-H., Kim C.-D., Construction safety management using FMEA technique: Focusing on the cases of steel frame work, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2007 – Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference, 1/2007, 55–63.
• [22] Murphy M., Heaney G., Perera S., A methodology for evaluating construction innovation constraints through project stakeholder competencies and FMEA, Construction Innovation, 11(4)/2011, 416–440.
• [23] Fruguglietti E., Pasqualato G., Sagula R., “The maintenance manual” in important infrastructural project, from the design up to the implementation after construction, [in:] Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, 2012, 3058–3065.
• [24] Bockstael D., Issa M.H., A methodology for contractor clash detection using building information modelling on commercial construction projects, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 21/2016, 233–249.
• [25] Choi S.-H., Kim Y.-S, Priority analysis of dispute factors in overseas construction based on FIDIC contract conditions, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(6)/2016, 2124–2133.
• [26] Lee J.S., Analysis of cost-increasing risk factors in modular construction in Korea using FMEA, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 1–12.
• [27] Sulakatko V., Lill I., Witt E., Methodological Framework to Assess the Significance of External Thermal Insulation Composite System (ETICS) on-site Activities, Energy Procedia, 96/2016, 446–454.

Uwagi

EN

Section "Civil Engineering"

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)