New technologies in real estate management and protection of privacy

Benduch, Dorota

doi:0000-0002-4575-7168

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

New technologies in real estate management and protection of privacy

Autorzy

Benduch Dorota

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

3_1_10_Benduch_149-162_accepted_27.10.2023.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

0000-0002-4575-7168

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The article examines the impact of new technologies on the property market, focusing on the integration of geospatial analytics with artificial intelligence (AI) to improve property management and gain competitive advantage. The analysis considers how AI tools, tailored to individual preferences, can assist in the management of large datasets that are critical to various sectors, including residential, commercial, office and hospitality. The primary research question addresses the extent to which the application of these innovative technological solutions affects privacy. The study identifies both challenges and potential risks, particularly in relation to privacy. It analyses the legal frameworks at national and European level, highlighting important similarities and differences. It concludes that current legal systems may struggle to adapt to the technological boom and the complexity of emerging technologies, in particular AI. The research highlights a gap in understanding the impact of advanced technologies on individual privacy and underlines the importance of responsible and ethical use of technology.

Słowa kluczowe

Proptech geospatial analysis new technologies law right to privacy real estate

Proptech analizy geoprzestrzenne prawo nowych technologii prawo do prywatności nieruchomości

Wydawca

SILGIS Association
Croatian-Polish Scientific Network

Czasopismo

GIS Odyssey Journal

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 3, no. 1

Strony

149--162

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 44 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Benduch Dorota

dorota.benduch@ue.katowice.pl

University of Economics in Katowice, Faculty of Spatial Economy and Regions in Transition, Department of Energy Transition, Katowice, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4575-7168

Bibliografia

1. Act of 23 April 1964 – Civil Code (Journal of Laws of 2023, item 1610 with amendments).
2. Afanasjew S. (2021). 5 steps to digital transformation in real estate. Objects, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–19.
3. AI HLEG. (2019). Ethical guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60419 [access: 01.10.2023].
4. Apthorpe N. J., Reisman D., Feamster N. (2017). A smart home is not a castle: Privacy vulnerabilities of encrypted IoT traffic. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.06805 .
5. Badowska A., Badowski M. (2019). Visual recording of real property vs right to privacy. In: IBasista, PCichociński, E. Dębińska, Gajos-Gržetić M. (ed.), 26th Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition “GIS ODYSSEY 2019”. Conference Proceedings, pp. 7–11.
6. Baum A. (2017). PropTech 3.0: the future of Real Estate. University of Oxford Research. www.sbs.oxford.edu [access: 01.10.2023].
7. Buitena M., de Streel A., Peitz M. (2023). The law and economics of AI liability. Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794.
8. Clapp J.M., Rodriguez M., Thrall G. (1997). How GIS Can Put Urban Economic Analysis on the Map. Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 368–386.
9. Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI). (2023). Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/cai [access: 01.10.2023].
10. Constitution of the Republic of Poland (Journal of Laws of 1997, No. 78, item 483, with amendments).
11. Constitutional Court. (2014). Judgment of 30.07.2014, K 23/11. Official Journal [Journal of Laws] 2014, no. 1055.
12. Couse, A. (2018, January 24). How drones, data and AI are changing the property sector. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/proptech- drones-data-ai-property-sector/ [access: 01.10.2023].
13. Daissaouia A., Boulmakoulc A., Karimd L., Lbatha A. (2020). IoT and Big Data Analytics for Smart Buildings: A Survey. Procedia Computer Science, pp. 170, 161–168.
14. Denko M.W. (2017). A privacy vulnerability in smart home IoT devices. University of Michigan-Dearborn. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/139706/49698122_EC E_699_Masters_Thesis_Denko_Michael.pdf [access: 01 October 2023].
15. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) (Council of Europe). https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf [access: 01.10.2023).
16. European Court of Human Rights. (1993). Costello-Roberts v. The United Kingdom (Application no. 13134/87). Judgment of 25 March 1993. A.247-C, para. 36.
17. European Court of Human Rights. (1994). Kroon and Others v. Netherlands (No. 18535/91), Judgment of 27 October 1994. Council of Europe. https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,584a99574.html [access: 01.10.2023].
18. European Union Cyber Security Agency [ENISA]. (2023). Security resilience good practices. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/security-resilience-good-practices [access: 01.10.2023].
19. Finn R. L., Wright D. (2016). Privacy, data protection and ethics for civil drone practice. Computer Law & Security Review, pp. 32, 577–586.
20. Florczak-Wątor M. (2019). Commentary on Article 47 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In: P. Tuleja (ed.), The Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Commentary. Wolters Kluwer, pp. 169–170).
21. Fránik M., Čermák M. (2020). Serious flaws found in many smart home hubs: is your device among them? WeLiveSecurity. https://www.welivesecurity.com/2020/04/22/serious-flaws-smart-home-hubs-is-your-device-among-them/ [access: 01.10.2023].
22. František Ryneš / Úřad. (2014). C-212/13.
23. Garlicki L. (2010). Commentary to Art. 1 ECHR. In: L. Garlicki (ed.), Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, vol. I, C.H. Beck, pp. 1–18, 34, 493.
24. HazardHub. (2023). HazardHub Platform. https://www.guidewire.com/products/hazardhub/ [access: 01.10.2023].
25. ICO. (2020). Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/key-dp- themes/guidance-on-ai-and-data-protection/ [access: 01.10.2023].
26. Karpiuk M. (2015). Right to privacy in the conditions of new technologies. In: K. Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz, M. Karpiuk (ed.), New technologies law. Selected issues. Wolters Kluwer, pp. 321–322.
27. Karpiuk M. (2017). Constitutional right to privacy and its limitation due to state security. The example of secret information. In: K. Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz, K. Kakarenko, M. Wyrzykowski (ed.), Security and Freedom. Wolters Kluwer, pp. 102–103).
28. Kim J., Kang D. (2019). AI application in real estate: Focusing on prediction accuracy and uncertainty to enhance investment decision-making. Automation in Construction, pp. 104, 102–114.
29. Korohodova L., Matias M. (2019). Smart homes and private life. Cybersecurity, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 328–334.
30. Lam K.C., Lim B.T.H. (1999). The use of GIS in real estate: Current applications and future directions. Journal of Property Finance, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 382–399.
31. Nevelsteen K.L.J. (2017). The Grinns Tale: A prototype urban analysis tool. Cities, vol. 69, pp. 26–34.
32. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 May 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 [access: 01.10.2023].
33. Polish Data Protection Authority's decision of 17 July 2020, reference ZKE.440.81.2019. https://uodo.gov.pl/decyzje/ZKE.440.81.2019 (access: 01 October 2023).
34. Saavedra J.R., Belda R.S. (2018). Automated Machine Learning: Review of the state-of- the-art challenges and opportunities. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.10406.pdf [access: 01.10.2023].
35. Sadowski J. (2019). Too Smart: How Digital Capitalism is Extracting Data, Controlling Our Lives and Taking Over the World. MIT Press.
36. Smith L. (2021). The Real Estate Implications of Smart Home Devices. Journal of Property Management, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 5–12.
37. Supreme Court. (2008). Judgment of 17 July 2008, II CSK 111/08.
38. The Guardian. (2019, August 9). Amazon workers can hear users' Alexa recordings, report says. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/11/amazon- workers-can-listen-to-users-alexa-recordings [access: 01.10.2023].
39. Trincado-Munoz F., van Meeteren M., Rubin T.H., Vorley T. (2023). Digital transformation in the world city networks' advanced producer services complex: A technology space analysis. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103721
40. Van Weyenbergh J., Podoynitsyna K. (2019). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 208, pp. 841–853.
41. Wang L., Alexander B. (2019). How IoT changes urbanism: An analysis based on case studies. Journal of Smart Cities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–38.
42. Wells D., Figueiredo J. (2018). Incorporating GIS into real estate research: The benefits and challenges. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 54–86.
43. Yurukoglu A., Corts K.S. (2020). Measuring the Benefits of Home Ownership: A Spatial Approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 549–562.
44. Zalnieriute M., Milanovic M. (2019). The ECtHR’s surveillance jurisprudence and the right to data privacy in the digital era. Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 35(5), no. 105356.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-1e90a4df-7af0-4de8-8dc8-5db74f76fc06