Physicochemical Characterization of a Feed Based on Food Waste for Broilers and Organic Chickens

• Autorzy: Mechkirrou Latifa , Arabi Mourad , Ouhssine Mohamed , Afilal Mohamed El Amine

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/139339

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The city of Oujda has a very significant production of solid waste that annually exceeds 340000 tons, of which the organic fraction represents at least 70%. In order to promote the recovery of solid organic waste, a study was carried out on an alternative food made from food waste (FW) in the city of Oujda (Morocco). Before being applied on different flocks of chickens (industrial broilers and farmer broilers), this Lab-Prepared Feed was analysed to determine its organo-mineral composition in comparison to other composed poultry feeds that are marketed in Morocco. The results of organo-mineral characterization showed a composition of 13% in total nitrogen, 7% in mineral matter and 4% in fat, while for the composed poultry feeds, these components were 15%, 6% and 5%, respectively. The composition of nutriment found for the studied materials may promote the food waste recovery to be used as a raw material of the Lab-Prepared Feed (LPF). Thus, it may enable to replace, under sustainable view, the composed poultry feeds, which have presently become very expensive due to various economic factors.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pollution; food waste; poultry feed; physicochemical characterization; nutrient quality; Morocco

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, iss. 5
• Strony: 110--118
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 53 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mechkirrou Latifa

• Laboratory of Agro-Physiology, Biotechnologies, Environment and Qualities, Faculty of Sciences, 242, 14000, Kenitra, Morocco
• Laboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohamed First University, Oujda, 717, 60000, Morocco

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-7201

autor

Arabi Mourad

• Laboratory of the Agricultural Production Improvement, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohamed First University, Oujda, 717, 60000, Morocco

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-663X

autor

Ouhssine Mohamed

• Laboratory of Agro-Physiology, Biotechnologies, Environment and Qualities, Faculty of Sciences, 242, 14000, Kenitra, Morocco

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5914-9315

autor

Afilal Mohamed El Amine

• Laboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohamed First University, Oujda, 717, 60000, Morocco

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-9119

Bibliografia

• 1. Abdel-Shafy H.I., Mansour M.S.M. 2018. Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. J. Egyptian J. Petroleum, 27, 1275-1290.
• 2. Abdollahi M.R., Hosking B., Ravindran V. 2015. Nutrient analysis, metabolisable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility of palm kernel meal for broilers. J. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., pp. 1-7.
• 3. Abolfathi M.E., Tabeidian S.A., Foroozandeh A.D., Tabatabaei S.N., Habibian M. (2019. Effects of ethanol extract of elecampane (Inula helenium L.) rhizome on growth performance, diet digestibility, gut health, and antioxidant status in broiler chickens. J. Livestock Sci., 223, 68-75.
• 4. Achour F. 2008. Caractérisation de la matière organique dans les ordures ménagères. Recherche d’indicateurs de stabilité, Thèse de doctorat. INSA de Lyon, France, pp. 1-173.
• 5. ADEME, 1993. Méthode de caractérisation des ordures ménagères MODECOM, 61.
• 6. Akhavan-Salamat H., Ghasemi H.A. 2019. Effect of different sources and contents of zinc on growth performance, carcass characteristics, humoral immunity and antioxidant status of broiler chickens exposed to high environmental temperatures. Livestock Sci., 233, 76-83.
• 7. Alinorm, 1995. Programme mixte FAO/OMS sur les normes alimentaires, Commission du codex alimentarius. Rapport de la dix-neuvième session du comité du codex sur les méthodes d’analyse et d’échantillonnage, Budapest (Hongrie), pp. 82.
• 8. Almendros G., Dorado J., Gonzales-Vila F.J., Blanco M.J., Lankes U. 2000. 13C NMR assessment of decomposition patterns during composting of forest and shrub biomass. Sol Biol. Biochem., 32, 793-804.
• 9. Aloueimine S., matejka G., Zurbrugg C., Mohamed M.E. 2005. Caractérisation des Ordures Ménagers à Nouakchott : Partie II : Résultats en Saison Sèche et en Saison Humide, pp. 1-8.
• 10. Arabi M., Sbaa M., Vanclooster M., Darmous A. 2020. Impact of the Municipal Solid Waste Typology on Leachate Flow under Semi-Arid Climate – A Case Study. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21(6), 94-101.
• 11. Binner E., Lechner P., Widerin M., Zach A. 1997. Laboratory test methods characterizing the biological reactivity of wastes. Proceedings Sardinia. Sixth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, Italy, pp. 485-494.
• 12. Cachet C. 2005. Evolution bio-physico-chimique des déchets enfouis au Centre de Stockage de Déchets Ultimes du SYDOM du Jura sous l’effet de la recirculation des lixiviats. L’institut national des sciences appliquées de Lyon, France, pp. 1-271.
• 13. Charnay F. 2005. Compostage des déchets urbains dans les Pays en Développement : élaboration d’une démarche méthodologique pour une production pérenne de compost, Thèse de doctorat. Université de Limoges France, pp. 1-277.
• 14. CCOT, 2020. ‘Climate change observatory team’: CAS D’ÉTUDE MAROC: La société marocaine en ordre dispersé contre la prolifération des déchets, pp. 23.
• 15. Croitoru L., Sarraf M. 2017. Le Coût de la Dégradation de l’Environnement au Maroc. Environ. Nat. Resour. Glob. Pract. Discuss. 5. 1-147.
• 16. Das S., Lee S.H., Kumar P., Kim K.H., Lee S.S., Bhattacharya S.S. 2019. Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability, J. Cleaner Prod., 228, 658-678.
• 17. Djakovitch J. L. 1988. Mise au point d’une méthode de détermination rapide du coefficient isohumique de matériaux organiques utilisables pour l’amendement des sols. Bordeaux CNAM, pp. 208.
• 18. El Gnaoui Y., Karouach F., Bakraoui M., Barzb M., El Baria H. 2020. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Effect of thermal pretreatment on improvement of anaerobic digestion process. Energy Reports, 6, 417–422.
• 19. Elkadi A., Maatouk M., Raissouni M., Chafik T., Mouhssine A. 2016. Caractérisation des déchets ménagers et assimilés de la ville de Tanger. Inter. J. of Innov. Appl. Stud., 18, 512-528.
• 20. Fortuoso B.F., Dos Reis J.H., Gebert R.R., Barreta M., Griss L.G., Casagrande R.A., De Cristo T. G., Santiani F., Campigotto G., Rampazzo L., Stefani L.M., Boiago M.M., Lopes L.Q., Santos R.C., Baldissera M.D., Zanette R.A., Tomasi T., Da Silva A.S. 2019. Glycerol monolaurate in the diet of broiler chickens replacing conventional antimicrobials: Impact on health, performance and meat quality. J. Microb. Pathogenesis., 129(7), 161-167.
• 21. Francois V. 2004. Détermination d’indicateurs d’accélération et de stabilisation de déchets ménagers enfouis. Etude de la recirculation de lixiviats sur colonnes de déchets. Thèse de doctorat, Universite de Limoges, France.
• 22. Fu J., Yang T., Wang W., Xu S. 2019. Effect of selenium antagonist lead-induced damage on Th1/Th2 imbalance in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of chickens. J. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 175, 74–82.
• 23. Gourdon R. 2002. Aide à la définition des déchets dits biodégradables, fermentescibles, méthanisables Association RECORD, n°00-0118/1A, pp. 151.
• 24. INRA, 2016. ‘Institut Nationale de la Recherche Agronomique’: Procédés d’analyses fourragères, Centre régional de la recherche agronomique de Rabat, Unité de recherche Production animales et fourrages.
• 25. Gudiso X., Hlatini V., Chimonyo M., Mafongoya P. 2018. Response of broiler (Gallus gallus domesticus) performance and carcass traits to increasing levels of Acacia Angustissima leaf meal as a partial replacement of standard protein sources. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 28, 13–22.
• 26. Hasnaoui M. D. 2017. Energies Environnement, Le magazine des éco technologies de l’Energie et de l’Environnement. Tri, Collecte et Revalorisation Des Déchets Au Maroc: Nouvelle Approche Durable de Gestion Des Déchets. Trimestriel N°16, pp. 1-44.
• 27. Kalantar M., Schreurs N.M., Raza S.H.A., Khan R., Ahmed J.Z., Yaghobfar A., Ali Shah M., Kalantar M.H., Hossein S.M., Ur Rahman S. 2019. Effect of different cereal-based diets supplemented with multi-enzyme blend on growth performance villus structure and gene expression (SGLT1, GLUT2, PepT1 and MUC2) in the small intestine of broiler chickens. Gene Rep., 15, 1-8.
• 28. Kaza S., Lisa Y., Perinaz B.T., Frank V.W. 2018. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Dev. Ser. Washington, pp. 1-295.
• 29. Komilis D.P., Ham R.K. 2003. The effect of lignin and sugars to the aerobic decomposition of solid wastes. J. Waste Manage. 23, 419-423.
• 30. Kwiecień M., Winiarska-Mieczan A., Milczarek A., Tomaszewska E., Matras J. 2016. Effects of zinc glycine chelate on growth performance, carcass characteristics, bone quality, and mineral content in bone of broiler chicken. Livestock Sci., 191, 43-50.
• 31. Lacour J. 2012. Valorisation de la fraction organique de résidus agricoles et autres déchets assimilés à l’aide de traitements biologiques anaérobies. Université Quisqueya, INSA de Lyon, France, pp. 1-218.
• 32. Laudadio V., Tufarelli V. 2020. Growth performance and carcass and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets containing micronized-dehulled peas (Pisum sativum cv. Spirale) as a substitute of soybean meal. Poultry Sci., 89, 1537–1543.
• 33. Lehmann L. A. 2003. Fiche technique: Elevage de poulets bio. Vulgarisation agricole, Edition Suisse, pp. 1-16.
• 34. Liu N., Deng X.J., Liang C.Y., Cai H.Y. 2018. Fermented Broccoli Residue Reduced Harmful Bacterial Loads and Improved Meat Antioxidation of Free-Range Broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 0: 1–7.
• 35. Maxime R. 2008. Dégradation anaérobie de déchets solides : caractérisation, facteurs d’influence et modélisations, Thèse de doctorat. L’institut national des sciences appliquées de Lyon, France, pp. 1-259.
• 36. Mertens D.R. 1997. Creating a System for Meeting the Fiber Requirements of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci., 80 (7), 1463–1481.
• 37. Millati R., Cahyono R.B., Ariyanto T., Azzahrani I.N., Putri R.U., Taherzadeh M.J. 2019. Agricultural, Industrial, Municipal, and Forest Wastes. Sustainable Resour. Recovery and Zero Waste Approaches, pp. 1–22.
• 38. Naimi Y., Saghir M., Cherqaoui A., Chatre B. 2016. Energetic recovery of biomass in the region of Rabat, Morocco, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy., pp. 1-7.
• 39. Nikiema M., Sawadogo J. B., Somda M.K., Traore D., Dianou D., Traore A.S. 2015. Optimisation de La Production de Biométhane à Partir Des Déchets Organiques Municipaux. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 9(5), 2743-2756.
• 40. Ognik K., Stępniowska A., Kozłowski K. 2017. The effect of administration of silver nanoparticles to broiler chickens on estimated intestinal absorption of iron, calcium, and potassium. Livestock Sci., pp. 1-22.
• 41. Papadomichelakis G., Pappas A.C., Tsiplakou E., Symeon G.K., Sotirakoglou K., Mpekelis V., Fegeros K., Zervas G. 2019. Effects of dietary dried olive pulp inclusion on growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens, Livestock Sci., pp. 1-33.
• 42. Roinsard A., Carrière J. 2015. Cahier technique : Alimentation des volailles en agriculture biologique, pp. 68.
• 43. Saadatmand N., Toghyani M., Gheisari A. 2019. Effects of dietary fiber and threonine on performance, intestinal morphology and immune responses in broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr., 5, 248-255.
• 44. Scarlat N., Motola V., Dallemand J.F., Monforti- Ferrario F., Mofor L. 2015. Evaluation of energy potential of Municipal Solid Waste from African urban areas. J. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 50, 1269–1286.
• 45. Seven I., Aksu T., Seven P.T. 2012. The Effects of Propolis and Vitamin C Supplemented Feed on Performance, Nutrient Utilization and Carcass Characteristics in Broilers Exposed to Lead, Livestock Sci., 148, 10–15.
• 46. Tchobanoglous G., Theisen H., Vigil S. 1993. Engineering principles and management issues. Integr. Solid waste Manage. London, pp. 978.
• 47. Tufarelli V., Demauro R., Laudadio V. 2015. Dietary micronized-dehulled white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) in meat-type guinea fowls and its influence on growth performance, carcass traits and meat lipid profile. Poultry Sci., 00, 1–7.
• 48. Valdivié-Navarro M., Martínez-Aguilar Y., Mesa- Fleitas O., Botello-León A., Betancur Hurtado C., Velázquez-Martí B. 2019. Review of Moringa oleifera as forage meal (leaves plus stems) intended for the feeding of non-ruminant animals. J. Animal Feed Sci. Technol., pp. 1-9.
• 49. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583–3597.
• 50. Vantress, 2015. Performances et Recommandations Nutritionnelles, Poulet de chair Cobb500TM, pp. 1-10.
• 51. Wang Y., Ru Y.J., Liu G.H., Chang W.H., Zhang S., Yan H.J., Zheng A.J., Lou R.Y., Liu Z.Y., Cai H.Y. 2015. Effects of different rearing systems on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, digestive organ weight, carcass traits, and energy utilization in male broiler chickens. Livestock Sci., pp. 1-6.
• 52. World Bank, 2012. What a waste. A global review of solid waste management. Urban Dev. Ser. Knowledge papers. Washington, DC, USA.
• 53. Yang Z.I., Qi X.M., Yang H.M., Dai H., Xu C.X., Wang Z.Y. 2018. Effects of Dietary Copper on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Nutrient Content of Fecal in Growing Goslings from 28 to 70 Days of Age. Brazilian J. Poultry Sci., 20, 45-52.