Non-urban area ownership structure. Case study of Southern Poland

• Autorzy: Glowacka A. , Janus J. , Bożek P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/geocart-2016-0019

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study shows a possible way of analyzing the diversity of ownership forms in non-urban areas, with particular focus on land co-ownership. The data in cadastral databases was processed with the use of the relational model which applied information on the geometry of areal spatial objects and descriptive attributes. The paper presents also the results of the analysis of Nowy Sącz District with the area of 1.550 sq.km and containing approximately 200.000 parcels. The area is representative for many countries in Central and Eastern Europe, where unfavorable land fragmentation indices and complex ownership structures complicate investing processes and development of rural areas what results in progressive degradation of agricultural and cultural landscape. The results indicate that the co-ownership phenomenon affects 13% of parcels in the study area. However, it varies greatly depending on the village and ranges from 3 to 67% of total parcels number. Suggested methods of analyzing the ownership structure are of universal character. In spite of this, when used during analyses conducted in other countries, certain modifications are required. It is mainly caused by the differences in cadastral data models used in those countries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

land and property register; consolidation; co-ownership; real estate register

PL

rejestr gruntów; współwłasność; rejestr nieruchomości

• Wydawca: Komitet Geodezji PAN
• Czasopismo: Geodesy and Cartography
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 65, no. 2
• Strony: 219--228
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Glowacka A.

• University of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Department of Agricultural Land Survey ing, Cadaster and Photogrammetry, 24-28 Al. Mickiewicza St., Krakow, Poland

autor

Janus J.

• University of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Department of Agricultural Land Survey ing, Cadaster and Photogrammetry, 24-28 Al. Mickiewicza St., Krakow, Poland

autor

Bożek P.

• University of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Department of Agricultural Land Survey ing, Cadaster and Photogrammetry, 24-28 Al. Mickiewicza St., Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Bydłosz, J. (2015). The application of the Land Administration Domain Model in building a country profile for the Polish cadastre. Land Use Policy, No 49: 598–605. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.011.
• [2] Bydłosz J. and Parzych P. (2007). The cadastral data exchange standards in Poland. FIG Working Week 2007 Hong Kong SAR, China, 13-17 May 2007 Name1 N.A., Name2 S. T., Complete Title of the paper, Book/Scientific Journal/Name of the Conference, Country, pp 45-51.
• [3] Cobanoglu, F., Ozkan, E. and Altintas, A. (2011). Farmers’ perceptions of smallholding co-ownership problems: A case study from Aydin, Turkey. Outlook on Agriculture, No 40(4): 299–306. DOI http://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2011.0062.
• [4] Döner, F., Thompson, R., Stoter, J., Lemmen, C., Ploeger, H., van Oosterom, P. and Zlatanova, S. (2011). Solutions for 4D cadastre – with a case study on utility networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, No 25(7),: 1173–1189. DOI http://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.520272.
• [5] Enemark, S. (2010). From Cadastre to Land Governance. The Cadastral Surveyor – paving the way to the future, 2nd EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON CADASTRE, Bucharest, Romania, 6–7 MAY 2010.
• [6] Gobin, A., Campling, P., Feyen, J. (2001). Spatial analysis of rural land ownership. Landscape and Urban Planning, No 55(3): 185–194. DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00153-0.
• [7] Hasanzadeh, K. (2010). GIS, Cadastre and Sustainable Development. International Journal of Geomatics Geosciences, No 1(3): 414–425, Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=60765177&site=ehost-live.
• [8] Herrmann, S. and Osinski, E. (1999). Planning sustainable land use in rural areas at different spatial levels using GIS and modelling tools. Landscape and Urban Planning, No 46(1-3): 93–101, DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00050-X.
• [9] Home, R. (2009). Land ownership in the United Kingdom: Trends, preferences and future challenges Land Use Policy., 26(SUPPL. 1). DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.013.
• [10] Hoppe, R. (2006). Land ownership and farm structure. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2006 Edition. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/872940/eib16.pdf.
• [11] Janus J., Zygmunt M. (2016). MKScal – System for Land Consolidation project Based on CAD Platform. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape, No 2/2016: 49–59.
• [12] Janus J., Taszakowski J. (2015). The Idea of Ranking in Setting Priorities For Land Consolidation Works. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape, 1/2015: 31–43.
• [13] Munton, R. (2009). Rural land ownership in the United Kingdom: Changing patterns and future possibilities for land use. Land Use Policy, No 26(SUPPL. 1). DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.012.
• [14] Siejka, M., Slusarski, M. and Zygmunt, M. (2014). 3D time Cadastre, possibility of implementation in Poland. Survey Review, No 46(335): 79–89, DOI http://doi.org/10.1179/1752270613y.0000000067.
• [15] Stoter, J. E. and van Oosterom, P. (2006). 3D Cadastre in an International Context : Legal, Organizational, and Technological Aspects. Fig Ladm 2013, DOI http://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005677.
• [16] Stoter, J. and Salzmann, M. (2003). Towards a 3D cadastre: Where do cadastral needs and technical possibilities meet Computers. Environment and Urban Systems, No 27(4): 395–410, DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00039-X.
• [17] Westhoek, H. J., Van Den Berg, M. and Bakkes, J. A. (2006). Scenario development to explore the future of Europe’s rural areas. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 114: 7–20, DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.005.
• [18] Vranken, L., Noev, N. and Swinnen, J. F. M. (2004). Fragmentation, abandonment, and co-ownership: Transition problems of the Bulgarian land market. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 43(4): 391–408.