Resilience assessment in crisis response phase – tentative approach

• Autorzy: Wolanin Jerzy , Kępka Paweł , Telak Oksana

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0016.0227

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ocena odporności w fazie reagowania na kryzys – podejście wstępne

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this paper is to indicate a possible measure of resilience of a local society. The concepts of resilience versus vulnerability are discussed. Two dimensions of resilience are considered: the first one, related to a security system organized by local authority and defined in the paper as systemic barriers and the second one, connected with a subjective possible reaction of population to a hazardous event defined as supplementary barriers. In the research of features of supplementary barriers their effectiveness was estimated in a questionnaire fulfilled by the crisis management staff in thirty regions in Poland. Employing the probability of success or failure, calculations of effectiveness of systemic and supplementary barriers were summarized giving the measure of strengthened or weakened entire safety system at the local level. A matrix of resilience was constructed.

PL

Celem artykułu jest wskazanie możliwej miary odporności społeczeństwa lokalnego. Omówiono koncepcje odporności oraz podatności na zagrożenia. Rozważane są dwa wymiary odporności: pierwszy – związany z organizowanym przez władze lokalne systemem bezpieczeństwa i określany w pracy jako bariery systemowe oraz drugi – związany z subiektywną możliwą reakcją ludności na zdarzenie niebezpieczne, określany jako bariery dodatkowe. W badaniach cech barier dodatkowych ich skuteczność oceniono w kwestionariuszu wypełnionym przez sztaby zarządzania kryzysowego w trzydziestu regionach w Polsce. Stosując prawdopodobieństwo sukcesu lub porażki, podsumowano obliczenia skuteczności barier systemowych i uzupełniających, dając miarę wzmocnionego lub osłabionego całego systemu bezpieczeństwa na poziomie lokalnym. Skonstruowano macierz odporności.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

resilience; vulnerability; risk; systemic and supplementary safety barriers

PL

odporność; podatność; ryzyko; systemowe i uzupełniające bariery bezpieczeństwa

• Wydawca: Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP / Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Nr 83
• Strony: 103--122
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wolanin Jerzy

• The Main School of Fire Service

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-6905

autor

Kępka Paweł

• Polish Naval Academy of the Heroes of Westerplatte

autor

Telak Oksana

• The Main School of Fire Service

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-3784

Bibliografia

• 1. Alexander D., Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey, “Natural Hazards and Earth System Science” 2013, Vol. 13, No 11, pp. 2707–2716.
• 2. Aven T., On some recent definition and analysis framework for risk, vulnerability, and resilience, “Risk Analysis” 2011, Vol. 31, No 4, pp. 515–522.
• 3. Aven T., Ben-Haim Y., Andersen H.B., Cox T., López Droguett E., Greenberg M., Guikema S., Kroeger W., Renn O., Thompson K.M., Zio E., Society for Risk Aanalysis Glossary, SRA-Glossary-FINAL.pdf, 2018.
• 4. Boin A., Hart P., Stern E., Sendelius B., The Politics of Crisis Management, Public Leadership under Pressure, Cambridge University Press 2016.
• 5. Chipangura P., An exploration of objectivism and social constructivism within the context of disaster risk, “An International Journal Disaster Prevention and Management” 2016, Vol. 25, No 2, pp. 261–274.
• 6. Coetzee C., Disaster resilience and complex adaptive systems theory. Finding common ground for risk reduction, “Disaster Prevention and Management” 2016, Vol. 25, No 2, pp. 196–211.
• 7. Cretney R. M., Local responses to disaster. The value of community led post disaster response action in resilience framework, “Disaster Prevention and Management” 2016, Vol. 25, No 1, pp. 27–40.
• 8. De Boer J., Muggah R., Patel R., Conceptualizing City Fragility and Resilience, “United Nations University Centre for Policy Research” 2016, Working paper 5.
• 9. Dillon B., Interoperability utopia – work in progress, “Crisis Response Journal” 2016, Vol. 11, March Issue, pp. 16–17.
• 10. Feng S., Hossain L., Paton D. Harnessing informal education for community resilience, “Disaster Prevention and Management” 2018, Vol. 27, No 1, pp. 43–59.
• 11. Food Security Information Network. Resilience Measurement Technical Working Group. Qualitative Data and Subjective Indicators for Resilience Measurement. Technical Series No 4, 2015. FSIN_TechnicalSeries_4.pdf (fsinplatform.org).
• 12. Kwok A.H., Paton D., Becker J., Hudson-Doyle E., Johnson D., A bottom-up to developing a neighbourhood-based resilience measurement framework, “Disaster Prevention and Management” 2018, Vol. 27, No 2, pp. 255–270.
• 13. Lewis J., The susceptibility of the vulnerable: some realities reassessed, “Disaster Prevention and Management” 2014, Vol. 23, No 1, pp. 2–11.
• 14. Mitrovic V.L., Resilience: detecting vulnerability in marginal groups, “Disaster Prevention and Management” 2016, Vol. 24, No 2, pp. 185–200.
• 15. NIST Special Publication 1190GB-13. Guide Brief 13 –Resilience Gaps –Identifying and Prioritizing Closure of Resilience Gaps, [in:] Guide Brief 13 – Resilience Gaps – Identifying and Prioritizing Closure of Resilience Gaps (nist.gov).
• 16. Paton D., Johnson D. (eds.), Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach. 2nd ed., Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd, Springfield 2017.
• 17. Piers B., Canon T., Davis I., Wisner B., At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, Routledge, London 1994, p. 9.
• 18. Reiman T., Rollenhagen C., Human and organizational biases affecting the management of safety, “Reliability Engineering and System Safety” 2011, Vol. 96, Issue 10, pp. 1263–1274.
• 19. Schneiderbauer S., Risk and Vulnerability to Natural Disaster – from Broad View to Focused perspective, PhD thesis, Freie Universität, Berlin 2007.
• 20. Sharifi A., Yamagata Y., Urban Resilience Assessment: Multiple Dimensions, Criteria, and Indicators [in]: Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, Springer, Switzerland 2016.
• 21. Sullivan M., Communities and their experience of emergencies, “The Australian Journal of Emergency Management” 2003, Vol. 18, No 1, pp. 19–26.
• 22. Veland H., Aven T., Risk communication in the light of different risk perspective, “Reliability Engineering and System Safety” 2013, pp. 34–40.
• 23. Wolanin J., Domain of Safety, “Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina” 2006, 3, pp. 52–53.
• 24. Wolanin J., Chosen elements of civilization as selection theory. This is why unwilling events are unavoidable, “Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina” 2006, 1, pp. 67–69.
• 25. Wolanin J., Perceiving, Drama, Discomfort – Shadow of disaster, “Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina” 2005, 3, pp. 5–11.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu „Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki” - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).