Selected problems of infrastructure development for residents of the Middle Pomeranian region: case study

• Autorzy: Olkiewicz Marcin , Dyczkowska Joanna Alicja

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2025.215.23

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to identify and evaluate the impact of selected infrastructure elements on the development of the Middle Pomeranian region. Efforts were made to prove that infrastructure of appropriate quality is the basic condition for the development of the region. Design/methodology/approach: In the study, quantitative and comparative methods were used in the data analysis. The article uses a comparative analysis of the road infrastructure of two counties: Koszalin and Slupsk. The analysis was supplemented by a diagnostic survey using a questionnaire survey technique among the inhabitants of both counties. Findings: In Koszalin, significant changes included: installation of ticket machines and e-tickets (94%), increased availability of city bikes (72%) and scooters (26%), and connection to Mielno by rail bus (56%). In Slupsk, on the other hand: extension of bicycle paths (38%), modifications of some routes for city buses (24%) and improvement of connections with suburban towns (16%). Research limitations/implications: After the completion of the S6 and S11 developments, a repeat survey should be carried out. According to the authors, these investments affect the quality of life of the residents in the areas studied. Surveys should be carried out on a larger group of respondents, particularly taking into account rural areas. Practical implications: Investments in the modernisation and development of infrastructure, including road infrastructure, were central to strategic regional development activities. They attracted investors for the development of business and were also a factor in the construction of the logistics center in Koszalin. Social implications: The development and increase in transport options for residents has directly improved the quality of life for residents. The completed road investments also contribute to improving living conditions and increasing the attractiveness of the region by making it more accessible. The well-developed transport infrastructure of the Middle Pomeranian Region gives specific benefits by increasing the number of tourists. Originality/value: The analysis of the interaction between transport infrastructure and the economy, as well as the measurement of the satisfaction effect of this interaction, is an important issue in the context of the implementation of the strategic development plan adopted by local governments and the government.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

development; infrastructure; Middle Pomeranian Region

PL

rozwój; infrastruktura; Pomorze Środkowe

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: z. 215
• Strony: 375--386
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Olkiewicz Marcin

• Koszalin University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6181-6829

autor

Dyczkowska Joanna Alicja

• Koszalin University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-3897

Bibliografia

• 1. Arshed, N., Hassan, M.S., Khan, M.U., Uppal, A.A. (2022). Moderating effects of logistics infrastructure development and real sector productivity: a case of Pakistan. Global Business Review, Vol. 23(3), pp. 676-693.
• 2. Bychkov, I.V., Kazakov, A.L., Lempert, A.A., Bukharov, D.S., Stolbov, A.B. (2016). An intelligent management system for the development of a regional transport logistics infrastructure. Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 77, pp. 332-343.
• 3. Chia-Lin, C. (2021). Regional Transport Planning. International Encyclopedia of Transportation. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10697-9.
• 4. Churchill, S.A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K., Smyth, R. (2021). Transport infrastructure and CO2 emissions in the OECD over the long run. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 95, 102857.
• 5. Farhadi, M. (2015). Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 74, pp. 73-90.
• 6. Gibbons, S., Lyytikäinen, T., Overman, H.G., Sanchis-Guarner, R. New road infrastructure: the effects on firms. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 110, pp. 35-50.
• 7. Górczyńska, A., Krawczyk, A. (2014). Infrastruktura drogowa w województwie pomorskim. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Zarządzanie i Finanse, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 167-193.
• 8. Guirao, B. (2021). Transport Demand Management. International Encyclopedia of Transportation. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10779-1.
• 9. Hajian, M., Kashani, S.J. (2021). Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals. Sustainable Resource Management. Sustainable Resource Management Modern Approaches and Contexts. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00018-3.
• 10. Harańczyk, A. (2015). Infrastruktura drogowa w rozwoju obszarów miejskich. In: T. Kudłacz, A. Hołuj (Ed.), Infrastruktura w rozwoju regionalnym i lokalnym wybrane problemy (pp. 33-45). Warszawa: CeDeWu Sp. z o.o.
• 11. Kaczyńska, W., Korycińska, K. (2014). Wpływ infrastruktury transportu drogowego na rozwój regionu. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach, No. 103, p. 320.
• 12. Kalisiak-Mędelska M. (2017). Transport i mobilność miejska w świetle krajowej polityki miejskiej 2023 - ujęcie logistyczne. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, No. 467, pp. 33-46, DOI: 10.15611/pn.2017.467.03.
• 13. Meijer, J.R., Huijbregts, M.A., Schotten, K.C., Schipper, A.M. (2018). Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13(6), 064006.
• 14. Mitra, B., Elhaj, A.I., Rahman, S.M. (2023). Sustainable Development and Industrial Ecosystem. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-323-93940-9.00008-6.
• 15. OECD (2004). Assessment & decision making for sustainable transport. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Retrieved from: https://read.oecdilibrary.org/transport/assessment-and-decision-making-for-sustainabletransport_9789282113134-en#page1
• 16. Olkiewicz, M. (2020). The role of the stakeholder in the quality improvement of an organization. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 19(143), pp. 235-245. DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2020.143.19
• 17. Oviedo, D., Nieto-Combariza, M. (2021). Transport Planning in the Global South. International Encyclopedia of Transportation. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10624-4.
• 18. Payán-Sánchez, B., Labella-Fernández, A., Serrano-Arcos, M.M. (2021). Modern age of sustainability: supply chain resource management. Sustainable Resource Management. Sustainable Resource Management Modern Approaches and Contexts. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00003-1
• 19. Persia, L., Usami, D.S., De Simone, F., De La Beaumelle, V.F., Yannis, G., Laiou, A., Salathè, M. (2016). Management of road infrastructure safety. Transportation research procedia, Vol. 14, 3436-3445.
• 20. Qi, G., Shi, W., Lin, K.C., Yuen, K.F., Xiao, Y. (2020). Spatial spillover effects of logistics infrastructure on regional development: Evidence from China. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, Vol. 135, pp. 96-114.
• 21. Reshetnikova, O., Dyczkowska, J.A., Olkiewicz, M., Paszkowska, D. (2021). Promoting Pro-ecological Behavior with Logistics Operators in Poland and Ukraine. Annual Set The Environment Protection, vol. 23, pp. 642-654. DOI:10.54740/ros.2021.045
• 22. Sen, S., Kumar, M. (2023). Basics and policies of sustainable development. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-93940-9.00009-8
• 23. Skorobogatova, O., Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Transport infrastructure development performance. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 178, pp. 319-329.
• 24. Vulevic, A. (2018). Linkage between regional accessibillity, economic development, and logistic infrastructure. Intelligent Transportation and Planning: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, No. 3, pp. 719-744.
• 25. Wiktorowska-Jasik, A. (2016). Rozwój transportu drogowego w ujęciu historycznym - najważniejsze osiągnięcia światowej motoryzacji. Transport, Logistyka, Porty, No. 1, pp. 15-19.
• 26. Wiśniewska, I., Puchacz, D., Krom, J. (2017). Polski rynek transportu. Przegląd Naukowo Metodyczny. Edukacja dla bezpieczeństwa, No. 1, p. 1077.
• 27. Wojciechowski, Ł., Wojciechowski, A., Kosmatka, T. (2009). Infrastruktura magazynowa i transportowa. Poznań: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki, pp. 232-233.
• 28. Wojewódzka-Król, K., Załoga, E. (2016). Transport - nowe wyzwania. Warszawa: PWN, p. 240.
• 29. Wolniak, R., Olkiewicz, M., Skotnicka-Zasadzień, B. (2019). Implementation of ISO 14001 Standard in the European Union Countries. Annual Set The Environment Protection, 2(21), pp. 868-880.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).