Promoting Information and Communication Technology in Online Service Delivery in Vietnam

• Autorzy: Nguyen Thi Ngoc Mai , Pham Ngoc Huong Quynh

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29227/IM-2021-02-

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Applying Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to public service delivery contributes to transparency, accountability, and cost-saving to improve administrative efficiency. This application has become an inevitable trend for administrative reform worldwide. This paper examines the policy of promoting ICT in public service delivery and its implementation in Vietnam. Recently, the Vietnamese government has created a thoroughly legal foundation to develop information infrastructure for public service delivery. However, online public service delivery results are still lower than expected, and the online service index in Vietnam has just reached the average level of the world. Therefore, to encourage citizens to use online public services, the government should improve the personal identification data system and promote propagating and popularize online public services. The government also should protect personal data and administrative system security to ensure organizational system safety and efficiency.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

information and communication technology; Vietnam government; online public service

PL

technologia informacyjna; technologia komunikacyjna; Wietnam

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Przeróbki Kopalin
• Czasopismo: Inżynieria Mineralna
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: no. 2
• Strony: 405--412
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Nguyen Thi Ngoc Mai

• National Academy of Public Administration, Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Pham Ngoc Huong Quynh

• VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam

Bibliografia

• 1. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/189-Viet-Nam, 12/6/2021.
• 2. https://pcivietnam.vn/du-lieu-pci, 12/6/2021.
• 3. Pina, V., Torres, L., Royo, S., 2009. E‐government evolution in E.U. local governments: a comparative perspective. Online Information Review, 33(6): 1137-1168, https://doi: 10.1108/14684520911011052.
• 4. Cepparulo, A., Zanfei, A., 2020. The diffusion of public eServices in European cities, Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101561.
• 5. Fakhoury, R., Aubert, B., 2015. Citizenship, trust, and behavioural intentions to use public e-services: The case of Lebanon, 2015. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3): 346-351, https://doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.002.
• 6. Cepparulo, A., Zanfei, A., 2020. The diffusion of public eServices in European cities, Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), https:// doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101561.
• 7. Fedotova, O., Teixeira, L., Alvelos, A., 2012. E-participation in Portugal: evaluation of government electronic platforms, Procedia Technology, 5: 152-161, https:// doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.017.
• 8. Gasova, K., Stofkova, K., 2017. E-Government as a Quality Improvement Tool for Citizens Services, Procedia Engineering, 192: 225-230, https://doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.039.
• 9. Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., Dwivedi, Y.K., 2018. What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage, Government Information Quarterly, 35(2): 161-174, https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004.
• 10. Kumar, R., Sachan, A., Mukherjee, A., 2018. Factors influencing e-government adoption in India: a qualitative approach, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(5): 413-433, https://doi:
• 10.1108/DPRG-02-2018-0007.
• 11. United Nations Organizations, 2020. E-Government Survey 2020 Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development With addendum on COVID-19 Response, p 1-225.
• 12. Schuppan, T., 2009. E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa, Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 118–127, https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006.
• 13. Ebbers, W.E., Jansen, M.G.M., van Deursen, J.A.M., 2016. Impact of the digital divide on egovernment: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage, Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 685–692, https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007.
• 14. Pleger, L.E., Mertes, A., Rey, A., Brüesch, C., 2020. Allowing users to pick and choose: A conjoint analysis of end-user preferences of public e-services,” Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101473.
• 15. Garín-Muñoz, T., López, R., Pérez-Amaral, T., Herguera, I., Valarezo, A., 2019. Models for individual adoption of eCommerce, eBanking and eGovernment in Spain, Telecommunications Policy, 43(1): 100-111.https:// doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.01.002.
• 16. Igari, N., 2014. How to successfully promote ICT usage: A comparative analysis of Denmark and Japan, Telematics and Informatics, 31(1): 115-125, https://doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2012.10.001.
• 17. Pieterson, W.J., Ebbers, W.E., 2020. Channel choice evolution: An empirical analysis of shifting channel behavior across demographics and tasks, Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101478.
• 18. Tangi, L., Benedetti, M., Gastaldi, L., Noci, G., Russo, C., 2021. Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy: Evidence from Italian local governments, Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), https://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101543.
• 19. Vrabie, C., 2015. Education–A Key Concept for E-Administration, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186: 371-375, https://doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.121.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).