Specificity of managing public real estate resources based on the example of the Polish experience

• Autorzy: Źróbek Ryszard , Źróbek Sabina

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2022.2.1.73

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Real estate, due to its specificity and the role it plays in the economic, social and environmental area, requires an economically effective but also sustainable approach to its use. There is a need to protect both public and private interests through rational real estate management with the use of modern decision support tools. The changing socio-economic environment in a given country, as well as international cooperation, require modernization of the rules and procedures of real estate management, especially those that make up the public real estate stock. This article presents the basic premises and goals of the existence of public real estate resources. Features and conditions specific to the management system of such a resource are also given. A list of strengths and weaknesses was made using the literature and the results of the authors’ own research on such a system functioning in Poland. It was emphasized that, at present, a key element in the decision-making process regarding spatial development and real estate management is having high-quality information. The article was written on the basis of selected literature, Polish law and the authors’ experience in property management and appraisal.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

management system; public real estate resources; spatial development

PL

system zarządzania; publiczne zasoby nieruchomości; zagospodarowanie przestrzenne

• Wydawca: SILGIS Association ; Croatian-Polish Scientific Network
• Czasopismo: GIS Odyssey Journal
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 2, no. 1
• Strony: 73--84
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Źróbek Ryszard

• University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Real Estate Management and GIS, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-1747

autor

Źróbek Sabina

• University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Spatial Analysis and Real Estate Market, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-7262

Bibliografia

• 1. Bovaird T., Loeffler E. (ed.) (2016). Public Management and Governance. ROUTLEDGE, Third Edition, p. 68.
• 2. Do Thi Tuyet M., Źróbek-Różańska A., Źróbek R. (2022). The experience of the Polish real estate market as a guide to transition of real estate sector in Vietnam. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 21(2), pp. 185-195.
• 3. Duivenvoorden E., Hartmann T., Brinkhuijsen M., Hesselmans T. (2021). Managing public space - A blind spot of urban planning and design. Cities, vol. 109, 103032, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103032, p. 3 [access: 01.06.2022]. F.A.O. (2007). Good governance in land tenure and administration. FAO Land Tenure Studies. no. 9. Rome, p. 68.
• 4. Gross M., Źróbek R. (2013). Public real estate management in post socialist countries. 2014/4. In: REMV, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 11-16.
• 5. Gross M., Źróbek R. (2015). Good Governance in Some Public Real Estate Systems. Land Use Policy, vol.49, pp. 352-364.
• 6. Grover R. (2009). State and public land management. In: Journal of Land Reform 2009/1. FAO, pp. 58-68.
• 7. Grover R., Grover Ch. (2011). Modeling Indicators of Land Governance. FIG, paper 4999. Marrakech, p. 23.
• 8. Ingram G., Hong Y-H. (ed.) (2009). Property Rights and Land Policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 31.
• 9. Kwiatkowski G. (2016). Własność państwowa a rola państwa we współczesnej gospodarce (State ownership and the role of the State in modern economy). www.ue.katowice.pl/fileadm, [access: 03.06.2022], pp. 228-237.
• 10. Leclercq E., Pojani D., (2021). Public space privatisation are users concerned? Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 2021, AHEAD-OF-PRINT, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1933572, p. 18.
• 11. Lee D. (2022). Public Space in Transition Co-production and Co-management of Privately Owned Public Space in Seoul and Berlin. Trascript Verlag, p. 202.
• 12. Maring L., Maaike B. (2018). Asset management to support urban land and subsurface management. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 615, pp. 390-397.
• 13. Marona B. (2018). Zarządzanie nieruchomościami gmin jako obszar teoretycznych rozważań i badań empirycznych w ramach zarządzania publicznego. (Municipal Real Estate Management as an Area of Theoretical Deliberations and Empirical Research in Public Management). Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie. Seria Specjalna, Monografie, nr 258, p. 225.
• 14. Molen Van der P. (2015). Property and administration: comparative observations on property rights and spatial planning with some cases from the Netherlands. Administration & society, 47.2, pp. 171-196.
• 15. NIK (2018). Wykorzystanie nieruchomosci gminnych na podstawie umów najmu, dzierżawy, użyczenia. Informacja o wynikach kontroli (Use of communal real estate on the basis of rental, lease and lending contracts. Information on the inspection results). www.nik.gov.pl, [accessed: 07.08.2022].
• 16. Stiglitz J. (2004). Ekonomia sektora publicznego, WN PWN, Warszawa, p. 483.
• 17. Survey on Status of Public Land Management in Kenya (2016). Full rapport, Land Development and Governance Institute 2/24/2016, Nairobi.
• 18. Trojanek M. (2019). Strategiczny wymiar gospodarowania komunalnym zasobem nieruchomości (Strategic Dimension of Municipal Real Estate Stock Administration). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, vol. 3, t. 342, pp. 45-59.
• 19. UN Habitat (2017). Global public space programme UN-Habitat, Nairobi.
• 20. Ustawa o gospodarce nieruchomościami 1997 (Real Estate Management Act 1997). Dz.U. (Journal of Laws) 1997, no. 115, item 741.
• 21. Williamson I., Enemark S., Wallace J., Rajabifard A. (2010). Land Administration Systems for Sustainable Development. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2010/papers/ts03 a/ts03a_williamson_enemark_et_al_4103.pdf [access: 01.06.2022].
• 22. World Bank (2011). Land Governance Assessment Framework. Washington D.C. Available at: http://www.wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2011/11/24/000386194_20111124011109/Rendered/PDF/657430PUBOEPI10657 24B09780821387580.pdf.
• 23. Zevenbergen J., Augustinus C., Antonio D., Bennett R. (2013). Pro-poor land administration: Principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented. In: Land Use Policy, no. 31, pp. 595-604.
• 24. Zevenbergen J., De Vries W., Bennett R. (ed.) (2015). Advances in Responsible Land Administration. CRS Press, Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: https://www.crcpress.com/Advancrs-in-Responsible- LandAdministration/Zevenbergen-Vries-Bennett/9781498719599 Zimmerman W. (2007). Good governance in public land management. In: Journal of Land Reform, Land Settlements and Cooperatives 2007/2 FAO, pp. 30-40.
• 25. Źróbek R. (2012). Current issues of real estate management Case study. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association - GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, pp. 18-33.
• 26. Źróbek R., Źróbek S., Źróbek-Różańska A., Źróbek-Sokolnik A., Dynowski P. (2020) Podstawy i Procedury Gospodarowania Publicznymi Zasobami Nieruchomości: Teoria i Praktyka (Fundamentals and Procedures of Managing Public Real Estate Resources: Theory and practice). Olsztyn: UWM in Olsztyn, Poland, p. 335.
• 27. Źróbek-Sokolnik A.; Dynowski P.; Źróbek S. (2021). Preservation and Restoration of Roadside Tree Alleys in Line with Sustainable Development Principles - Mission (Im)possible? Sustainability, 13(17), 9635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179635, p. 17.
• 28. Źróbek-Różańska A., Zadworny D. (2016). Can urban sprawl lead to urban people governing rural areas? Evidence from the Dywity Commune, Poland. Cities, vol. 59:57-65, DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2016.06.003.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).