Asset Management. the Point of View of The Users' Costs

• Autorzy: Almeida José C.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2022-0058

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Bridges by their nature are structures that absorb a large amount of resources. For the promoter, usually public entities, the biggest share of the investment is made when the new structures are raised. However, as will be shown in the study presented in this paper, user costs are often much higher than direct costs and may even be higher by an order of magnitude. In addition to the costs resulting from maintenance/rehabilitation interventions, there are also environmental damages due to the pollution caused by the vehicles. The presented methodology will be applied to a case study where the global costs are highlighted and determined considering the scenario in which there are no disturbances in the circulation of vehicles and when they occur due to maintenance and rehabilitation works.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability; bridges; life cycle costs; maintenance costs; environment pollution

PL

zrównoważony rozwój; mosty; koszty cyklu życia; koszty użytkownika; zanieczyszczenia środowiska

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 32, no. 4
• Strony: 282--292
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Almeida José C.

• CISE - Electromechatronic Systems Research Centre, Instituto Politécnico da Guarda, Portuga

Bibliografia

• 1. Capacci, L, Biondini, F, and Frangopol, DM 2022. Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks: Review. Resilient Cities and Structures 1(2), 23-41.
• 2. Andrade, C, Garcés, P Baeza, FJ, Galao, Ó, and Zornoza, E 2015. Electronic and Electrolytic Conduction of Cement Pastes with Additions of Carbonaceous Materials. In: Andrade, C., Gulikers, J., Polder, R. (eds) Durability of Reinforced Concrete from Composition to Protection. Springer, Cham. Springer: Cham (ZG), Switzerland.
• 3. Balestra, CET, Nakano, AY, Savaris, G and Medeiros-Júnior, RA 2019. Reinforcement corrosion risk of marine concrete structures evaluated through electrical resistivity: Proposal of parameters based on field structures. Ocean Engineering 187, Article 106167.
• 4. Melchers, RE and Chaves, IA 2018. Service Life Estimation of Concrete Infrastructures. Eco-Efficient Repair and Rehabilitation of Concrete Infrastructure, 15-41.
• 5. Tsompanakis, Y 2010. Vulnerability assessment of structures and infrastructures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 6 (1-2), Special Issue. p 301.
• 6. Ellingwood, BR 2005. Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: State of practice and research issues. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 1(1), 7-18.
• 7. Welde, M and Volden, GH 2022. Improving value for money through better front-end management: An attempt to reduce costs and increase user benefits in the planning of a motorway project. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10 (3), 1611-1619.
• 8. WCED 1987. Our common future, World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, New York, U.S.A.
• 9. LNEC E-465 2007. [Concretes – Methodology to estimate the performance properties of concrete that allow satisfying the design life of reinforced or prestressed concrete structures under XC and XS environmental exposures]. Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon, Portugal.
• 10. Tuutti, K 1982. Corrosion of steel in concrete, Report n.º CBI Research FO 4:82, Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
• 11. AUSTROADS, 2011. Update of vehicle/road relationships underpinning road user costs and externality costs – Literature review. Technical Report AP-T189-11, Austroads, Sydney, Australia.
• 12. Lopes, SA and Cardoso, JL 2007. Accident prediction models for Portuguese motorways. Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon, Portugal.
• 13. Unger, N, Bond, TC, Wang, JS, Koch, DM, Menon, S, Shindell, DT and Bauer, S 2010. Attribution of climate forcing to economic sectors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(8), 3382-3387.
• 14. FHWA, 2016. Highway statistics. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
• 15. Schoettle, B, Sivak, M and Tunnell, M 2016. A Survey of Fuel Economy and Fuel Usage by Heavy-Duty Truck Fleets. Arlington, Virginia: The University of Michigan. U.S.A.
• 16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. Ann Arbor.
• 17. IMT 2022. [National Highway traffic report. 1st semester 2022]. Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes, I.P. Lisbon, Portugal.
• 18. PORDATA 2022. [Motorized road vehicles in circulation: total and by type of vehicle]. Retrieved September 7, 2022 from https://www.pordata.pt/portugal/veiculos+rodoviarios+motorizados+em+circ ulacao+total+e+por+tipo+de+veiculos-3100.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)