PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The effects of R&D and innovation capabilities on the thai automotive industry part’s competitive advantage: a SEM approach

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A structural equation model was used to verify both the direct and indirect influences on research and development and innovation capabilities that affect Thai automotive parts enterprises competitive advantage. Thailand’s automotive sector is a major driver of the economy with a multi-thousand network of both domestic and international companies contributing a significant amount to both domestic and Asian economic growth. After peaking in 2013 and reaching the Top 10 automotive nations, there has been a slide backwards. Competition is fierce and the pace of change ever quickening. Therefore, the researchers sought to determine how the automotive parts sector needed to improve in capability, skills and infrastructure to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage. From the structural equation model analysis of 220 regional automotive parts sector managers and use of AMOS software, it was determined that research and development combined with innovation plays key roles in the industry’s profitability and survivability. Additionally, there must be support across a wide sector of the economy, including universities, government agencies and institutions. Once championed as the ‘Detroit of Asia’, Thailand’s recognized success as a global automotive hub is a classic case of a well-executed industrial plan but that lead can potentially slip away without embracing new technologies and innovative thinking.
Twórcy
autor
  • Huachiew Chalearprakiet University, Faculty of Business Administration, 18/18 Bangna-Trad Road, Km.18 T. Bangchalong, A. Bangplee, 10540 Samut Prakarn, Thailand
autor
  • King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Faculty of Administration and Management, Thailand
autor
  • University of Vaasa, Finland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Martinuzzi A., Kudlak R., Faber C., Wiman A., CSR activities and impacts of the automotive sector, 2011, RIMAS Working Papers, No. 3/2011, http://tinyurl.com/ofxf44o [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [2] OICA. 2015 production statistics, http://tinyurl.com/qjft242 [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [3] GAIKINDO: Indonesian domestic car market likely pp 5% in 2016, 2015, http://tinyurl.com/grmkvwn [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [4] Statista, Automobile production in China from January 2014 to January 2015 (in 1,000 units), http://tinyurl.com/ncn2cjr [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [5] Thai AutoBook, Thailand AutoBook 2015, http://www.thaiautobook.com/ [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [6] The Nation, 5-yr auto plan aims for top-10 ranking, http://tinyurl.com/pull5x4 [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [7] NSTDA, National Science and Development Agency, NSTDA’s Strategic Plan 2011-2016, Strategic Planning Alliance II: SPAII, http://tinyurl.com/ozx67g3 [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [8] Thailand: Global green automotive production base, http://tinyurl.com/ht74q8g [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [9] Thailand Automotive Institute Master Plan for Automotive Industry 2012-2016, Ministry of Industry, http://tinyurl.com/o6cs4xs [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [10] Trends and opportunities in Thailand’s emerging automotive aftermarket, http://tinyurl.com/zu3b535 [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [11] Mahmoud-Jouini S.B., Lenfle S., Platform reuse lessons from the automotive industry, International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 30, 1, 98-124, 2010.
  • [12] Chumaidiyah E., The Technology, Technical Skill, and R&D Capability in Increasing Profitability on Indonesia Telecommunication Services Companies, Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 110–119, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00326-7.
  • [13] Kocoglu I., Imamoglu S.K., Ince H., Keskin H., Learning, R&D and Manufacturing Capabilities as Determinants of Technological Learning: Enhancing Innovation and Firm Performance, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 842–852, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1062.
  • [14] Porter M.E., Competitive Advantage, New York, USA: Free Press, 1985.
  • [15] Barney J.B., Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, 99-120, 1991, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.
  • [16] Yinghong W., Wang Q. Making sense of a market information system for superior performance: The roles of organizational responsiveness and innovation strategy, Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 2, 267-277, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.039.
  • [17] Kristal M.M., Huang X., Roth A.V., The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 5, 415-429, 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002.
  • [18] Porter M.E., The technological dimension of competitive strategy, Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, R.S. Rosenbloom [Ed.], Greenwich, CT, USA: Jai, pp. 1-33, 1983.
  • [19] Oh J., Rhee S.-K., Influences of supplier capabilities and collaboration in new car development on competitive advantage of carmakers, Management Decision, 48, 5, 756-774, 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043911.
  • [20] Wang C.-T., Chiu C.-S., Competitive strategies for Taiwan’s semiconductor industry in a new world economy, Technology in Society, 36, 60-73, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.12.002.
  • [21] Verma R., Jayasimha K.R., Service delivery innovation architecture: An empirical study of antecedents and outcomes, IIMB Management Review, 26, 2, 105-121, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2014.03.002.
  • [22] Antonio K.W.L., Richard C.M.Y., Tang E., The complementarity of internal integration and product modularity: An empirical study of their interaction effect on competitive capabilities, Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 26, 4, 305-326, 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.10.005.
  • [23] Pradip P., Narkhede B.E., Akarte M.M., An exploratory Study of Manufacturing Strategy of Packaging Product Manufacturing Companies in India, International Journal for Quality research, 6, 3, 233-249, 2012.
  • [24] Richard C.M., Yam W.L., Esther P.Y.T., Antonio K.W.L., Technological Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance, World Academy of Science, in Engineering and Technology, 42, 1009-1017, 2010, http://tinyurl.com/z5okvub [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [25] Tseng M.L., Sheng H., Nguyen T., Vy T., Mediate effect of technology innovation capabilities investment capability and firm performance in Vietnam, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 817-829, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.267.
  • [26] Ar I.M., Baki B., Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks, European Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 2, 172 206, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061111124885.
  • [27] Chiou T.-Y., Chan H.K., Lettice F., Chung S.H., The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan, Transport. Res. Part E., 47, 6, 822-836, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016.
  • [28] Dabić M., Daim T.U., Aralica Z., Bayraktaroglu A.E., Exploring relationships among internationalization, choice for research and development approach and technology source and resulting innovation intensity: Case of a transition country Croatia, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 23, 1, 15-25, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2012.03.002.
  • [29] Wanga Z., Wang N., Knowledge Sharing, Innovation and Firm Performance, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10, 8899-8908, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017.
  • [30] Ar I.M., The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854-864, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.144.
  • [31] Boon-itt S., Paul H., A study of supply chain integration in Thai automotive industry: a theoretical framework and measurement, Management Research News, 29, 4, 194-205, 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01409170610665059.
  • [32] Garcia A., Mohnen P., Impact of government suport on R&D and innovation, Working Paper, 34, United Nations University - Maastricht, 2010, http://tinyurl.com/hgaxjqj [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [33] Trott P., Innovation Management and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, (5th Edition), 2011.
  • [34] Un C.A., Kazuhiro A., Types of R&D Collaborations and Process Innovation: The Benefit of Collaborating Upstream in the Knowledge Chain, Journal of Product Innovation and Management, 32, 1, 138-153, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12229.
  • [35] Lee C.-Y., Competition favors the prepared firm: Firms’ R&D responses to competitive market pressure, Res. Pol., 38, 5, 861-870, 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.005.
  • [36] Lin B.-W., Wu C.-H., How does knowledge depth moderate the performance of internal and external knowledge sourcing strategies?, Technovation, 30, 11-12, 582-589, 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.07.001.
  • [37] Wang C.-H., Lu Y.-H., Huang C.-W., Lee J.-Y., R&D, productivity, and market value: An empirical study from high-technology firms, Omega, 41, 1, 143-155, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.12.011.
  • [38] Rogers E., Diffusion of Innovation, 5th ed. New York, USA: The Free Press, 2003.
  • [39] Rothwell R., Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process, International Marketing Review, 11, 1, 7-31, 1994, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057491.
  • [40] Gkiourka P., Tutesigensi A., Moodley K., A holistic conceptual model for managing innovation, Procs 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, C. Egbu [Ed.], 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK, pp. 967-976, 2010.
  • [41] Mazzola E., Perrone G., Kamuriwo D.S., Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow, International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.002.
  • [42] Mina A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau E., Hughes A., Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge, Research Policy, 43, 5, 853-866, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.004.
  • [43] Hooleya G.J., Greenleya G.E., Cadogana J.W., Fahy J., The Performance impact of marketing resources, Journal of Business Research, 58, 1, 18-27, 2005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00109-7.
  • [44] Krishnaswamy K.N., Mathirajan M., Subrahmanya M.H.B., Technological innovations and its influence on the growth of auto component SMEs of Bangalore: A case study approach, Technology in Society, 38, 18-23, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.01.001.
  • [45] Khurum M., Fricker S., Gorschek T., The contextual nature of innovation- An empirical investigation of three software intensive products, Information and Software Technology, 57, 595-613, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.010.
  • [46] Foret J.A., Steen J., Verreyrute M.-L., How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 204-213, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.062.
  • [47] Zawislak P.A., Alves A.C., Tello-Gamarra J., Barbieux D., Reichert F.M., Innovation Capability: From Technology Development to Transaction Capability, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7, 2, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000200002.
  • [48] García-Morales V.J., Jim´enez-Barrionuevo M.M., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez L., Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation, Journal of Business Research, 65, 7, 1040-1050, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005.
  • [49] Gunday G., Ulusoy G., Kilic L., Alpkan L., Effects of innovation types on firm performance, in International Journal of Production Economics, 133, 2, 662-676, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014.
  • [50] Bolívar-Ramos M.T., Garc´ıa-Morales V.J., García-Sánchez E., Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance, J. Eng. Tech. Manag., 29, 3, 331-357, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.006.
  • [51] Lee J.-S., Hsieh C.-J., A research in relating entrepreneurship, marketing capability, innovation capability and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Business Economics Research, 8, 9, 109–119, September 2010, http://tinyurl.com/jd78mrb [accessed on September 3, 2016], http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jber.v8i9.763.
  • [52] Cronbach L.J., Coefficient alpha and the international structure of tests, Psychometric, 16, 3, 297-334, 1951, http://tinyurl.com/gtfuvqg [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [53] Likert R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes, Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55, 1932, http://tinyurl.com/z5f2nmx [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [54] Nunnally J., Bernstein L., Psychometric theory, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Higher, 1978.
  • [55] Hair J., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Multivariate analysis (7th ed.), Upper saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education International, 2010.
  • [56] Schumacker R.E., Lomax R.G., A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, New York, USA: Routledge, 2010.
  • [57] Tanaka J.S., Huba G.J., A Fit Index for Covariance Structure Models under Arbitrary GLS Estimation, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 2, 197-201, 1985, DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00834.x.
  • [58] Yamane T., Statistics, An introductory analysis (2nd Ed.), New York, USA: Harper and Row, 1967.
  • [59] Israel G.D., Determining Sample Size. Fact Sheet PEOD-6, 1992, http://tinyurl.com/gvun8cb [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [60] Edwards J.R., Bagozzi R.P., On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures, Psychological Methods, 5, 2, 155-174, 2000, http://tinyurl.com/jm76yf5 [accessed on September 3, 2016].
  • [61] Colomboa M.G., Rabbiosi L., Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions, Research Policy, 43, 6, 1039-1054, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.013.
  • [62] Gunasekaran A., Spalanzani A., Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications, International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 1, 35-47, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.011.
  • [63] Mariadoss B.J., Tansuhaj P.S., Mouri N., Marketing capabilities and innovation-based strategies for environmental sustainability: An exploratory investigation of B2B firms, Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 8, 1305-1318, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.006.
  • [64] OECD, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual, Third Edition, Prepared by the Working Party of National Experts on Scientific and Technology Indicators, OECD, Paris, para. 177, 2005.
  • [65] Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sinkovics R.R., The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing, Advances in International Marketing: New Challenges to International Marketing, R.R. Sinkovics and P.N. Ghauri [Eds.], Emerald, Bingley, UK., pp. 277-319, 2009.
  • [66] Lauro C., Vinzi V.E., Some Contribution to PLS Path Modeling and a System for the European Customer Satisfaction, The European Commission grant ESIS (European Satisfaction Index System), 2004.
  • [67] Bicen P., Kamarudin S., Johnson W.H.A., Validating new product creativity in the eastern context of Malaysia, Journal of Business Research, 67, 1, 2877-2883, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.007.
  • [68] Wingwon B., Effects of Entrepreneurship, Organization Capability, Strategic Decision Making and Innovation toward the Competitive Advantage of SMEs Enterprises, Journal of Management and Sustainability, 2, 1, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jms.v2n1p137.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-1bcd8a62-1ffa-4ce8-bc58-23039ede17df
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.