High-resolution reflectivity inversion based on joint sparse representation

Shi, Zhanzhan; Zhou, Huailai; Wang, Yuanjun; Niu, Cong; Huang, Rao

doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00360-9

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

High-resolution reflectivity inversion based on joint sparse representation

Autorzy

Shi Zhanzhan , Zhou Huailai , Wang Yuanjun , Niu Cong , Huang Rao

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-019-00360-9

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

High-resolution reflectivity inversion is termed as a fundamental yet essential step for the prediction of thin-bedded hydrocarbon reservoirs. However, algorithms suffer from two key issues: (1) seismic inversion is an ill-posed problem that has multiple solutions, and the results of trace-by-trace seismic inversion are quite poor in lateral continuity, and (2) algorithm stability is likely to be decreased owing to the noise and distortion associated with the acquisition and processing flows. In the current article, we formulate a new joint sparse representation through the combination with L_2,1- norm misfit function, which possesses superior noise robustness, in particular in the presence of outliers. On the basis of the L_2,1- norm regularization, this specific approach enforces a common sparsity profile, together with consistently lowering the multiplicity of solution. Subsequent to that, the resultant algorithm is applied to the multi-trace seismic inversion. Besides, the wedge model trial and practical applications suggest that the proposed inversion algorithm is stable, in addition to having good noise robustness and lateral continuity; moreover, the vertical resolution of λ/8 is realized under the noise and outliers interference. The logging data calibration illustrates that the proposed methodology is accurate and credible.

Słowa kluczowe

seismic inversion alternating direction method joint sparse representation L 2,1-norm misfit function L 2,1-norm regularization

inwersja sejsmiczna

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2019

Tom

Vol. 67, no. 6

Strony

1535--1550

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 56 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Shi Zhanzhan

zhouhuailai06@cdut.cn

College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Engineering and Technical College, Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, China

autor

Zhou Huailai

College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

autor

Wang Yuanjun

College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
School of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002, China

autor

Niu Cong

CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100027, China

autor

Huang Rao

CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100027, China

Bibliografia

1. Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2:183–202. https://doi.org/10.1137/080716542
2. Becker S, Bobin J, Candès E (2011) NESTA: a fast and accurate first-order method for sparse recovery. SIAM J Imaging Sci 4:1–39. https://doi.org/10.1137/090756855
3. Chopra S, Castagna J, Portniaguine O (2006) Seismic resolution and thin-bed reflectivity inversion. CSEG Rec 2006:19–25
4. Chen J, Huo X (2006) Theoretical results on sparse representations of multiple-measurement vectors. IEEE Trans Signal Process 54:4634–4643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2006.881263
5. Chen S, Donoho D, Saunders M (2001) Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev 43:129–159. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450037906X
6. Chung H, Lawton D (1995) Amplitude responses of thin beds: sinusoidal approximation versus Ricker approximation. Geophysics 60:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443750
7. Claerbout J, Muir F (1973) Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics 38:826–844. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440378
8. Cotter SF, Rao BD, Kjersti E, Kreutz-Delgado K (2005) Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53:2477–2488. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2005.849172
9. Deng W, Yin W, Zhang Y (2013) Group sparse optimization by alternating direction method. In: Proceedings of SPIE 8858, wavelets and sparsity XV, pp 88580R. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2024410
10. de Voogd N, den Rooijen H (1983) Thin-layer response and spectral bandwidth. Geophysics 48:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441400
11. Eldar YC, Mishali M (2009) Robust recovery of signals from a structured union of subspaces. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 55:5302–5316. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2009.2030471
12. Fuchs J (2009) Fast implementation of a ℓ1–ℓ1 regularized sparse representations algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2009 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York. pp 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4960337
13. Gabay D, Mercier BA (1976) Dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation. Comput Math Appl 2:17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(76)90003-1
14. He B, Yuan X (2012) On the O(1/n) convergence rate of the Douglas–Rachford alternating direction method. SIAM J Numer Anal 50:700–709. https://doi.org/10.1137/110836936
15. Jiang J, Wang Z, Chen C, Lu T (2016) L1–L1 norms for face super-resolution with mixed Gaussian-impulse noise. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, pp 2089–2093. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472045
16. Kallweit R, Wood L (1982) The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets. Geophysics 47:1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441367
17. Kazemi N, Sacchi M (2014) Sparse multichannel blind deconvolution. Geophysics 79:V143–V152. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0465.1
18. Kazemi N, Gholami A, Sacchi MD (2016) Modified sparse multichannel blind deconvolution. In: 78th EAGE conference and exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Houten. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201601244
19. Kobayashi K, Kim S, Kojima M (2008) Sparse second order cone programming formulations for convex optimization problems. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 51:241–264. https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.51.241
20. Koefoed O, de Voogd N (1980) The linear properties of thin layers, with an application to synthetic seismograms over coal seams. Geophysics 45:1254–1268. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441122
21. Li F, Xie R, Song W, Zhao T, Marfurt K (2017) Optimal Lq norm regularization for sparse reflectivity inversion. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2017. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa. pp 677–681 https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17666814.1
22. Li F, Xie R, Song W, Chen H (2019) Optimal seismic reflectivity inversion: data-driven ℓpℓp-loss-ℓqℓq-regularization sparse regression. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 16:806–810. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2881102
23. Liu J, Ji S, Ye J (2010) SLEP: sparse learning with efficient projections. Dissertation, Arizona State University
24. Liu Q, Davoine F, Yang J, Cui Y, Jin Z, Han F (2018) A fast and accurate matrix completion method based on QR decomposition and L 2,1-norm minimization. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 30:803–817. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2851957
25. Mallat SG, Zhifeng Z (1993) Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Process 41:3397–3415. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.258082
26. Marfurt K, Kirlin R (2001) Narrow-band spectral analysis and thin-bed tuning. Geophysics 66:1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487075
27. Nguyen T, Castagna J (2010) High-resolution reflectivity inversion. J Seism Explor 19:303–320
28. Nie F, Huang H, Cai X, Ding CHQ (2010) Efficient and robust feature selection via joint ℓ2,1-norms minimization. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on neural information processing systems
29. Partyka G, Gridley J, Lopez J (1999) Interpretational applications of spectral decomposition in reservoir characterization. Lead Edge 18:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438295
30. Puryear C, Castagna J (2006) An algorithm for calculation of bed thickness and reflection coefficients from amplitude spectrum. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2006. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa. pp 1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2369866
31. Puryear C, Castagna J (2008) Layer-thickness determination and stratigraphic interpretation using spectral inversion: theory and application. Geophysics 73:R37–R48. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2838274
32. Puryear C, Castagna J, Portniaguine O, Cobos C (2012) Constrained least-squares spectral analysis: application to seismic data. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2012. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0822.1
33. Russell B (1988) Part 6—sparse–spike inversion. In: Domenico S (ed) Introduction to seismic inversion methods. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa. pp 6-1–6-34. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802303.ch6
34. Schuster G (2017) Chapter 1: introduction to seismic inversion. In: Sun Y (ed) Seismic inversion. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560803423.ch1
35. Stojnic M, Parvaresh F, Hassibi B (2009) On the reconstruction of block-sparse signals with an optimal number of measurements. IEEE Trans Signal Process 57:3075–3085. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2009.2020754
36. Tropp JA, Gilbert AC, Strauss MJ (2006) Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: greedy pursuit. Signal Process 86:572–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.030
37. Tropp JA (2006) Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part II: convex relaxation. Signal Process 86:589–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.031
38. van den Berg E, Friedlander M (2008) Probing the Pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM J Sci Comput 31:890–912. https://doi.org/10.1137/080714488
39. van Riel P, Berkhout A (1985) Resolution in seismic trace inversion by parameter estimation. Geophysics 50:1440–1455. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442012
40. Wang B, Guo Z, Chen X, Lu W (2016) Nonstationary sparse-reflectivity inversion using nonconvex constraint in frequency domain. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2016. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 3741–3745 https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13858493.1
41. Wang S, Yuan S, Ma M, Zhang R, Luo C (2015) Wavelet phase estimation using ant colony optimization algorithm. J Appl Geophys 122:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.09.013
42. Widess M (1973) How thin is a thin bed? Geophysics 38:1176–1180. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440403
43. Widess M (1982) Quantifying resolving power of seismic systems. Geophysics 47:1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441379
44. Xiao Y, Zhu H, Wu SY (2013) Primal and dual alternating direction algorithms for ℓ1–ℓ1-norm minimization problems in compressive sensing. Comput Optim Appl 54:441–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-012-9475-x
45. Yang J, Peng Y, Xu W, Dai Q (2009) Ways to sparse representation: an overview. Sci China Ser F Inf Sci 52:695–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-009-0045-5
46. Yang J, Zhang Y (2011) Alternating direction algorithms for ℓ1-problems in compressive sensing. SIAM J Sci Comput 33:250–278. https://doi.org/10.1137/090777761
47. Yin XY, Liu XJ, Zong ZY (2015) Pre-stack basis pursuit seismic inversion for brittleness of shale. Pet Science 12:618–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-015-0056-3
48. Yuan SY, Liu JZ, Zhang R, Tian N, Wang SX (2014) Seismic deconvolution via total variation regularization. In: 76th EAGE conference and exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Houten. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141594
49. Yuan S, Wang S, Tian N, Wang Z (2016) Stable inversion-based multitrace deabsorption method for spatial continuity preservation and weak signal compensation. Geophysics 81:V199–V212. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0247.1
50. Yuan S, Wang S, Ma M, Ji Y, Deng L (2017) Sparse Bayesian learning-based time-variant deconvolution. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55:6182–6194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2722223
51. Yuan S, Wang S, Luo C, Wang T (2018) Inversion-Based 3-D seismic denoising for exploring spatial edges and spatio-temporal signal redundancy. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15:1682–1686. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2854929
52. Zhang F, Dai R, Liu H (2014) Seismic inversion based on L1-norm misfit function and total variation regularization. J Appl Geophys 109:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.024
53. Zhang R, Castagna J (2011) Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decomposition. Geophysics 76:R147–R158. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0103.1
54. Zhang R, Mrinal KS, Sanjay S (2013) Multi-trace basis pursuit inversion with spatial regularization. J Geophys Eng 10:035012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/10/3/035012
55. Zhang Z, Xu Y, Yang J, Li X, Zhang D (2015) A survey of sparse representation: algorithms and applications. IEEE Access 3:490–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2430359
56. Zhang Z, Li F, Zhao M, Zhang L, Yan S (2017) Robust neighborhood preserving projection by nuclear/L 2,1-norm regularization for image feature extraction. IEEE Trans Image Process 26:1607–1622. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2654163

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-1bb2efc0-7373-4476-9b4b-b59c6a4c6725