Removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution using complexation-ultrafiltration

• Autorzy: Şahin D. , Tascıoglu S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pjct-2018-0026

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ligand-modified micellar-enhanced ultrafi ltration (LM-MEUF) is a membrane technique based on a separation process which can be used for removal of target metals from an aqueous solution. This method involves adding both a metal complexing ligand and surfactant molecule to the aqueous solution under conditions where most of the molecules are present as micelles. This ligand can be attached to the surface of micelles by solubilization and forms the ligand complexes with the metal ion. The aqueous solution is then treated through a membrane which has to be smaller pore sizes than those of the complexes. Hence, permeate water is then purified from the heavy metals. In this study, divalent lead is the target ion in a solution. Filtration experiments were performed with ultrafi ltration membrane system, equipped with a regenerated cellulose membrane with a 5000 Daltons cutoff. The pressure was fixed at 4.0 bar with a permeate flow rate of 500 mL min^–1 . Complexes of Pb²⁺  ions with three ligands were investigated in micellar medium of different surfactants at different pH values to determine the ligands which could provide separation. Different parameters affecting the percentage rejection of the Pb²⁺ , such as pH and surfactant concentration were also discussed. Results have shown that the maximum percentage of the Pb²⁺  ions rejection were obtained using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a surfactant and dithizone (DZ) as the lead-specifi c ligand. A waste stream sample from a battery plant was subjected to LM-MEUF process in the optimum conditions determined in this study and it was shown that Pb²⁺  ions in a waste stream could be removed by LM-MEUF effectively.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ligand-modified micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration; LM-MEUF; Pb2+ ions; dithizone; DZ; sodium dodecyl sulfate; SDS

• Wydawca: West Pomeranian University of Technology. Publishing House
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Chemical Technology
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 20, nr 2
• Strony: 80--84
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Şahin D.

• Department of Chemistry, Gazi University, Ankara-06500, Turkey

autor

Tascıoglu S.

• Department of Chemistry, Gazi University, Ankara-06500, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Huang, J., Zeng, G., Zhou, C., Li X., Shi, L.J. & He, S.B., (2010). Adsorption of surfactant micelles and Cd2+/Zn2+ in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration, J. Hazard. Mater. 183, 287–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.022.
• 2. Ghazy, S.E., El-Morsy, S.M.A. & Ragab, H., (2008). Ion Flotation of Copper (II) and Lead (II) from Environmental Water Samples J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage., 12, (3) 75-–82.
• 3. Meunier, N., Laroulandie, J., Blais, J.F. & Tyagi, R.D., (2003). Coca shells for heavy metal removal from acidic solutions, Bioresource Technol., 90, 255–263. PMID: 14575948.
• 4. Ho, Y.S, Ng, J.C.Y. & McKay, G., (2001). Removal of lead(II) from effuents by sorption on peat using second-order kinetics, Sep. Sci.Technol., 36, 241–261.
• 5. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), (1999). Toxicological Profiles, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta.
• 6. Babel, S. & Kurniawan, T.A., (2003). Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review, J. Hazard. Mater. 3967, 1–25. PMID: 12573840.
• 7. Bai, R.S. & Abraham, E., (2003). Studies on chromium(VI) adsorption-desorption using immobilized fungal biomoss, Bioresour. Technol. 87, 17–26. PMID: 12733570.
• 8. Mathilde, R.J., Janne, F.R., Signe, N. & Lisbeth, M.O., (2004). Electrodialytic removal of cadmium from wastewater sludge, J. Hazard. Mater. 106, (2–3) 127–132.
• 9. Kim, H.J., Baek, K., Kim, B.K. & Yang, J.W. (2005). Humic substance-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of cobalt, J. Hazard. Mater. A 122, (31–36). DOI: 0.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.043.
• 10. Muthukrishnan, M. & Guha, B.K. (2006). Heavy metal separation by using surface modifi ed nanofiltration membrane, Desalination 200, 351–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.371.
• 11. Huang, J.H., Zeng, G.M. & Xu, K. (2005). Removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solution via micellar - enhanced ultrafiltration, T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 15, 184–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10026-010-0036-8.
• 12. Samper, E., Rodríguez, M., De la Rubia, M.A., Prats, D., (2009). Removal of metal ions at low concentration by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), Separation and Purification Technology, 65, 337–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.11.013.
• 13. Juang, R.S., Xu, Y.Y. & Chen ,C.L., (2003). Separation and removal of heavy metal ions from dilute solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafi ltration, J. Membr. Sci. 218, 257–267. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00183-2.
• 14. Scamehorn, J.F., Sherril, D.C., El-Sayed, D.A. & Uchiyama, H., (1994). Removal of divalent metal cations and their mixture from aqueous streams using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration, Sep. Sci. Technol., 29, 809–830.
• 15. Bae, S., Kim, D. & Lee, W. (2013). Degardation of diclofenac by pyrite catalysed Fenton oxidation”, Appl. Catal. B. Envion., 134–135, 93–102.
• 16. Subha, R., Sridevi, O.A., Anitha, D.& Sudha, D., (2015). Treatment methods for the removal of phenol fromwater-A Review. International Conference on Systems, Science, Control, Communication, Engineering and Technology: 199–203.
• 17. Paulenovà, A., Rajec, P., Ježikovà, M., & Kučera, J., (1996). Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium, J. Radioanal. Nuclear Chem., 208, 145–152.
• 18. Christian, S.D., Bhat, S.N. & Tucker, E.E., (1988). Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate anion from aqueous streams, J.AIChE, 34 189–194. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690340203.
• 19. Sasaki, K.J., Burnett, S.L., Christian, S.D. Tucker, E., & Scamehorn, J.F., (1989). Polyelectrolyte Ultrafiltration of Multivalent Ions. Removal of Cu(II) by Sodium Polystyrenesulfonate, Langmuir, 5, 363–369.
• 20. Jim Roach, D. & Jesus Zapien, H., (2009). Inorganic ligand-modified, colloid-enhanced ultrafiltration: a novel method for removing uranium from aqueous solution. Water Research 43, 4751–4759.
• 21. Vibhandik A.D. & Marathe K.V., (2014). Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar enhanced ultrafi ltration using mixed surfactants, Front. Chem. Sci. Engine., 8, (1) 79–86.
• 22. Klepac, Simmons, D.L., Taylor, R.W., Scamehorn, J. F. & Christian, S.D., (1991).Use of Ligand-Modified Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafictration in the Selective Removal of Metal lons from Water, Sep. Sci. Technol., 26, (2)165–173. DOI: 10.1080/01496399108050464.
• 23. Fillipi, B.R., Scamehorn, J.F., Christian, S.D. & Taylor, R.W., (1997). Selective Removal of Copper from an Aqueous Solution Using Ligand-Modifi ed Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Using an Alkyl-β-diketone Ligand, Sep. Sci. Technol., 32, 2401–2424.
• 24. Pramauro, E., Bianco, A., Bami, E., Viscardi, G. & Hinze, W.L. (1992). Pre-concentration and removal of iron (III) from aqueous media using micellar enhanced microfiltration, Colloids Surf. A., 63, 291–300.
• 25. Roach, J.D. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Oklahoma, (1996).
• 26. Vandegrift, G.F., Reed, D.T. & Tasker, I.R. Eds.; ACS Symposium Series, (1992) 509 180-193.
• 27. Jillot, B.A. & Williams, J.P., (1958). Further comple ferreous of dimethylglyoxime, J. Che. Soc., 462–467 DOI: 10.1039/JR9580000462.
• 28. Burger, K., Belcher, R. & Freiser, H., Organic Reagents in Metal Analysis, (1973) Volume 54 in International Series of Monographs on Analytical Chemistry
• 29. Kumar, B, Singh, H.B., Katyal, M. & Sharma, R.L. (1991). Spectrophotometric and derivative spectrophotometric determination of copper (II) with dithizone in aqueous phase, Microchimica Acta, 105, (1–3) 79–87

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).