Separation of surface flow from subsurface flow in catchments using runoff coefficient

Ardekani, A. Afshar; Sabzevari, T.; Haghighi, A. Torabi; Petroselli, A.

doi:10.1007/s11600-021-00667-6

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Separation of surface flow from subsurface flow in catchments using runoff coefficient

Autorzy

Ardekani A. Afshar , Sabzevari T. , Haghighi A. Torabi , Petroselli A.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-021-00667-6

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Separating surface flow (SF) from subsurface flow (SSF) based on direct runoff measurements in river gauges is an important issue in hydrology. In this study, we developed a simple and practical method, based on runoff coefficient (RC), for separating SF from SSF. RC depends mainly on soil texture, land use and land cover, but we also considered the effect of slope and rainfall intensity. We assessed our RC-based method for three different soil types by comparing the value obtained with laboratory rainfall simulator data. The correlation coefficient between observed and calculated data exceeded 0.93 and 0.63 when estimating SF and SSF, respectively. The method was then used to separate SF and SSF in two catchments (Heng-Chi and San-Hsia) in Northern Taiwan, and the results were compared with those produced by the geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) model. Test revealed that, if RC is calculated accurately, the proposed method can satisfactorily separate SF from SSF at catchment scale.

Słowa kluczowe

surface flow subsurface flow separation runoff coefficient

przepływ powierzchniowy przepływ podpowierzchniowy separacja współczynnik odpływu

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 69, no. 6

Strony

2363--2376

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 42 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ardekani A. Afshar

Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Estahban Branch, Fars, Iran

autor

Sabzevari T.

t_sabzevari@iauest.ac.ir

Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Estahban Branch, Fars, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-1751

autor

Haghighi A. Torabi

Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

autor

Petroselli A.

Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization (DEIM), Tuscia University, Via S. Camillo de Lellis snc, 01100 Viterbo, VT, Italy

Bibliografia

1. Akan AO, Houghtalen RJ (2003) Urban hydrology, hydraulics, and stormwater quality: engineering applications and computer modeling. Wiley
2. Ameli AA, Craig JR, McDonnell JJ (2015) Are all runoff processes the same? Numerical experiments comparing a Darcy-Richards solver to an overland flow-based approach for subsurface storm runoff simulation. Water Resour Res 51(12):10008–10028
3. Brown VA, McDonnell JJ, Burns DA, Kendall C (1999) The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow. J Hydrol 217(3–4):171–190
4. Chang CH, Lee KT (2008) Analysis of geomorphologic and hydrological characteristics in watershed saturated areas using topographic-index threshold and geomorphology-based runoff model. Hydrol Process Int J 22(6):802–812
5. Chen Z, Govindaraju RS, Kavvas ML (1994a) Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields: 1. Dev Models Water Resour Res 30(2):523–533
6. Chen Z, Govindaraju RS, Kavvas ML (1994b) Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields 2. Numer Simul Water Resour Res 30(2):535–548
7. Chow V, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1962) Applied hydrology. J Eng Educ 308:1959
8. Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York
9. Dehghanian N, Saeid Mousavi Nadoushani S, Saghafian B, Damavandi MR (2020) Evaluation of coupled ANN-GA model to prioritize flood source areas in ungauged watersheds. Hydrol Res 51(3):423–442
10. Essig ET, Corradini C, Morbidelli R, Govindaraju RS (2009) Infiltration and deep flow over sloping surfaces: Comparison of numerical and experimental results. J Hydrol 374(1–2):30–42
11. Fariborzi H, Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Mohammadpour R (2019) Prediction of the subsurface flow of hillslopes using a subsurface time-area model. Hydrogeol J 27(4):1401–1417
12. Foks SS, Raffensperger JP, Penn CA, Driscoll JM (2019) Estimation of base flow by optimal hydrograph separation for the conterminous United States and implications for national-extent hydrologic models. Water 11(8):1629
13. Harris DM, McDonnell JJ, Rodhe A (1995) Hydrograph separation using continuous open system isotope mixing. Water Resour Res 31(1):157–171
14. Hursh CR, Brater EF (1941) Separating storm-hydrographs from small drainage-areas into surface-and subsurface-flow. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 22(3):863–871
15. Johst M, Casper MC, Muller C, Schneider R (2013) Separation of stormflow hydrographs in surface and subsurface flow by perceptual based modelling of channel inflow components. Open Hydrol J 7(1):66
16. Keshtkaran P, Sabzevari T, Karami Moghadam M (2018) Estimation of runoff in ungauged catchments using the Nash non-dimensional unit hydrograph. Case study: Ajay and Kasilian catchments
17. Kim NW, Shin MJ (2018) Estimation of peak flow in ungauged catchments using the relationship between runoff coefficient and curve number. Water 10(11):1669
18. Kim NW, Shin MJ, Lee JE (2016) Application of runoff coefficient and rainfall-intensity-ratio to analyze the relationship between storm patterns and flood responses. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 66:1–48
19. Lee KT, Chang CH (2005) Incorporating subsurface-flow mechanism into geomorphology-based IUH modeling. J Hydrol 311(1–4):91–105
20. Lee J, Kwak C, Park H (2015) Estimation of runoff coefficient through infiltration analysis by soil type. J Korean Soc Hazard Mitig 15(4):87–96
21. Liu YB, De Smedt F (2004) WetSpa extension, a GIS-based hydrologic model for flood prediction and watershed management, vol 1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, p 108
22. Menberu MW, Torabi Haghighi A, Ronkanen A, Kvaerner J, Kløve B (2014) Runoff curve numbers for peat-dominated watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 20(4):66
23. Mishra SK, Singh VP (2013) Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology, vol 42. Springer
24. Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, Cifrodelli M, Corradini C, Govindaraju RS (2015) Infiltration on sloping surfaces: laboratory experimental evidence and implications for infiltration modeling. J Hydrol 523:79–85
25. Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, Govindaraju RS (2018) Role of slope on infiltration: a review. J Hydrol 557:878–886
26. Petroselli A (2020) A generalization of the EBA4SUB rainfall-runoff model considering surface and subsurface flow. Hydrol Sci J 65(14):2390–2401
27. Petroselli A, Grimaldi S (2018) Design hydrograph estimation in small and fully ungauged basins: a preliminary assessment of EBA4SUB framework. J Flood Risk Manag 11:S197–S210
28. Petroselli A, Asgharinia S, Sabzevari T, Saghafian B (2020a) Comparison of design peak flow estimation methods for ungauged basins in Iran. Hydrol Sci J 65(1):127–137
29. Petroselli A, Piscopia R, Grimaldi S (2020b) Design discharge estimation in small and ungauged basins: EBA4SUB framework sensitivity analysis. J Agric Eng LI:1040
30. Piscopia R, Petroselli A, Grimaldi S (2015) A software package for the prediction of design flood hydrograph in small and ungauged basins. J Agric Eng XLVI 432:74–84
31. Ribolzi O, Patin J, Bresson LM, Latsachack KO, Mouche E, Sengtaheuanghoung O, Valentin C (2011) Impact of slope gradient on soil surface features and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Laos. Geomorphology 127(1–2):53–63
32. Robinson JS, Sivapalan M (1996) Instantaneous response functions of overland flow and subsurface stormflow for catchment models. Hydrol Process 10(6):845–862
33. Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Valdes JB (1979) The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water Resour Res 15(6):1409–1420
34. Sabzevari T (2017) Runoff prediction in ungauged catchments using the gamma dimensionless time-area method. Arab J Geosci 10(6):131
35. Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S (2014) Effects of hillslope geometry on surface and subsurface flows. Hydrogeol J 22(7):1593–1604
36. Sabzevari T, Fattahi MH, Mohammadpour R, Noroozpour S (2013) Prediction of surface and subsurface flow in catchments using the GIUH. J Flood Risk Manag 6(2):135–145
37. Singh VP (1988) Hydrologic systems. Volume I: rainfall-runoff modeling. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 480
38. Tarboton DG (2003) Rainfall-runoff processes. Utah State Univ 1(2):66
39. Tekeli YI, Şorman Ü (2003) Separation of hydrograph components using stable isotopes case study: the Güvenç Basin, Ankara. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 27(6):383–396
40. Tiefan P, Jianmei L, Jinzhong L, Anzhi W (2005) A modified subsurface stormflow model of hillsides in forest catchment. Hydrol Process Int J 19(13):2609–2624
41. Troch PA, Mancini M, Paniconi C, Wood EF (1993) Evaluation of a distributed catchment scale water balance model. Water Resour Res 29(6):1805–1817
42. Wels C, Cornett RJ, Lazerte BD (1991) Hydrograph separation: a comparison of geochemical and isotopic tracers. J Hydrol 122(1–4):253–274

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-1ac15517-0492-4990-8765-43435a64c7c0