Comparison of results of surface texture measurement obtained with stylus methods and optical methods

• Autorzy: Pawlus P. , Reizer R. , Wieczorowski M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/123894

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The results of surface texture measurements obtained with the stylus equipment, white light interferometer and confocal profilometer of the same samples were compared. Machined isotropic and anisotropic surfaces, of symmetric and asymmetric ordinate distribution were measured. Forms were removed using polynomials. Sampling intervals and measuring areas during computations of parameters were the same. Discrepancies between the results obtained with various methods were observed and discussed. It was found that errors of surface texture measurement with the optical methods depend on the type of surface topography.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

surface texture; stylus; white light interferometer; confocal method

• Wydawca: Komitet Metrologii i Aparatury Naukowej PAN
• Czasopismo: Metrology and Measurement Systems
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 25, nr 3
• Strony: 589--602
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab., wykr., wzory

Twórcy

autor

Pawlus P.

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Reizer R.

• University of Rzeszow, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Al. Rejtana 16c, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Wieczorowski M.

• Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Pl. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań

Bibliografia

• [1] Vorburger, T.V., Dagata, J.A., Wilkening, G., Iizuka, K. (1998). Characterization of surface topography. Czanderna, A.W., et al. (eds.). Beam Effects, Surface Topography and Depth Profiling in Surface Analysis. New York: Plenum Press, 275-354.
• [2] Song, J., Vorburger, T.V. (1996). Stylus flight in surface profiling. ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Engr., 118, 188-196.
• [3] Whitehouse, D.J. (1994). Handbook of surface metrology. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing.
• [4] Whitehouse, D.J. (2002). Surfaces and their measurement. London: Hermes Penton Science.
• [5] Pawlus, P. (2002). The errors of surface topography measurement using stylus instrument. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 3(9), 273-289.
• [6] Pawlus, P., Wieczorowski, M., Mathia, T. (2014). The errors of stylus method in surface topography measurement. Szczecin: Zapol.
• [7] Thomas, T.R. (1999). Rough Surfaces. London: Imperial College press.
• [8] Mathia, T.G., Pawlus, P., Wieczorowski, M. (2011). Recent trends in surface metrology. Wear, 271, 494-508.
• [9] Jiang, X., Whitehouse, D.J. (2012). Technological shifts in surface metrology. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 61(2), 815-836.
• [10] Blunt, L. (2012). Introduction: the history and current state of 3D surface characterisation. Blunt, L., Jiang, X. (eds). Advanced Techniques for Assessment Surface Topography, London: Kogan Page Science, 1-13.
• [11] Leach, R. (ed.), (2011). Optical measurements of surface topography. Berlin: Springer.
• [12] Whitehouse, D.J. (2011). Surface metrology today: complicated, confusing, effective. Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Metrology and Properties of Engineering Surfaces. Twickenham Stadium, UK, 1-10.
• [13] Rhee, H.G., Vorburger, T.V., Fu, J., Renegar, T.B., Song, J.F. (2005). Comparison of roughness measurements obtained with optical and stylus techniques. Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Metrology and Properties of Engineering Surfaces, Saint-Etienne, France, 39-47.
• [14] Vorburger, T.V., Rhee, H.G., Renegar, T.B., Song, J.F., Zheng, A. (2007) Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture. International Journal of J. Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 33, 110-118.
• [15] Gao, F., Leach, R., Petzing, J., Coupland, J.M. (2008). Surface measurement errors using commercial scanning white light interferometers. Measurement Science and Technology, 19, 015303.
• [16] Demircioglu, P., Durakbasa, M.N. (2011). Investigations on machined metal surfaces through the stylus type and optical 3D instruments and their mathematical modeling with the help of statistical techniques. Measurement, 44, 611-619.
• [17] Durakbasa, M.N., Osanna, P.H., Demircioglu, P. (2011). The factors affecting surface roughness measurements of the machined flat and spherical surface structures - the geometry and the precision of the surface. Measurement, 44, 1986-1999.
• [18] Merola, M., Ruggiero, A., De Mattia, J.S., Affatato, S. (2016). On the tribological behavior of retrieved hip femoral heads affected by metallic debris. A comparative investigation by stylus and optical profilometer for a new roughness measurement protocol. Measurement, 90, 365-71.
• [19] Nieslony, P., Krolczyk, G.M., Zak, K., Maruda, R.W., Legutko, S. (2017). Comparative assessment of the mechanical and electromagnetic surfaces of explosively clad Ti-steel plates after drilling process. Precision Engineering, 47, 104-110.
• [20] Pawlus, P., Chetwynd, D.G. (1996). Efficient characterization of surface topography in cylinder bores. Precision Engineering, 19, 164-174.
• [21] Leach, R. (ed.). (2013). Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture. Berlin: Springer.
• [22] Pawlus, P. (2004). Mechanical filtration of surface profiles. Measurement, 35(4), 325-341.
• [23] Pawlus, P., Reizer, R., Wieczorowski, M. (2017). Problem of Non-Measured Points in Surface Texture Measurements. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 24(3), 525-536.
• [24] Pawlus, P., Graboń W., Reizer, R., Górka, S. (2015). A study of variations of areal parameters on machined surfaces. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 3(2), 025003.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).