AIS contribution in navigation operation- using AIS user satisfaction model

• Autorzy: Harati-Mokhtari A. , Brooks P. , Wall A. , Wang J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

AIS was introduced in 2002 and its phased implementation programme completed in 2004. Problems still exist in its reliable use for navigational operation. Our paper is part of a wider evaluation of AIS. This paper considers the users view of AIS and we have attempted to measure the extent of navigators’ satisfaction with AIS in their navigation activities by using an AIS User Satisfaction Model. This paper evaluates the validity of the AIS User Satisfaction Model using questionnaire data as a suitable structure for measuring the degree of navigators’ satisfaction and usage of AIS, and probably applies for other similar technologies. This, in turn, could help to determine the measures that need to be adopted in order to improve quality and use of AIS as an effective navigation and anti-collision tool.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Automatic Identification System (AIS); navigation operation; AIS User Satisfaction Model; anticollision; data analysis; marine navigation; path analysis; Information Technology (IT)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 3
• Strony: 243--250
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 6 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Harati-Mokhtari A.

• Liverpool John Moores University, UK & Chabahar Maritime University, Iran

autor

Brooks P.

• Liverpool John Moores University, UK

autor

Wall A.

• Liverpool John Moores University, UK

autor

Wang J.

• Liverpool John Moores University, UK

Bibliografia

• 1. Adamson, I., and Shine, J. (2003) Extending the New Technology Acceptance Model to Measure the End User Information Systems Satisfaction in a Mandatory Environment: A Bank’s Treasury. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, p. 441-455.
• 2. Brown, S.A., Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M..M., and Burkman, J.R. (2002) Do I Really Have to? User Acceptance of Mandated Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, p. 283-295.
• 3. Davis, F. D. (1986) A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
• 4. Harati-Mokhtari A, Wall A, Brooks P & Wang J (2007) AIS: Data reliability and human error implications., to be published for publication in the Journal of Navigation,September 2007, Vol. 60, No. 3.
• 5. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, Vol.46, No. 2, p.186-204.
• 6. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, p. 425-478.